Deriving the indications for laparoscopic appendectomy from a comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy

被引:21
|
作者
Maxwell, JG [1 ]
Robinson, CL
Maxwell, TG
Maxwell, BG
Smith, CR
Brinker, CC
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Surg, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] New Hanover Reg Med Ctr, Dept Surg, New Hanover, NC USA
[3] Coastal Area Hlth Educ Ctr, Wilmington, NC 28402 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2001年 / 182卷 / 06期
关键词
laparoscopic appendectomy; indications; gender differences; negative appendectomy rate; obesity;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00798-X
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Indications for laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) remain controversial and poorly defined. We sought to identify indications for LA through a comparison of LA and open appendectomies (OA). Methods: We reviewed demographics, coexisting medical conditions, radiology and pathology data, hospital course, and complications from charts on all LA patients and a comparison group of OA done from 1991 to 1998. Results: The following were significantly associated with LA: female sex, higher mean body mass index (BMI), coexisting medical problems, private insurance, and daytime surgery. The OA group was significantly more likely to have: a radiology report suggesting the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, perforation of the appendix, intensive care unit admission, and complications in their hospital course. Forty-one percent of the LA patients did not have appendicitis, compared with 20% of the OA patients. Conclusions: Daytime surgery, women, private insurance, coexisting medical problems, prior abdominal surgery, higher BMI, and less severe disease appear to be used by surgeons as indicators for LA. The threshold for surgical exploration appears to be lower for LA. (C) 2002 Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 692
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses
    Long, KH
    Bannon, MP
    Zietlow, SP
    Helgeson, ER
    Harmsen, WS
    Smith, CD
    Ilstrup, DM
    Baerga-Verala, Y
    Sarr, MG
    [J]. SURGERY, 2001, 129 (04) : 390 - 400
  • [42] ANALYSIS OF LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY COMPARISON WITH OPEN APPENDECTOMY WITH RESPECT TO SURGICAL SITE INFECTION
    Ahmed, Waqas
    Ali, Sheikh Muhammad Umair
    Fatima, Sundas
    [J]. INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 5 (11): : 12079 - 12082
  • [43] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
    Williams, MD
    Collins, JN
    Wright, TF
    Fenoglio, ME
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 89 (07) : 668 - 674
  • [44] LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPENDECTOMY
    IKARD, RW
    FEDERSPIEL, CF
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (13): : 881 - 882
  • [45] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
    Merhoff, AM
    Merhoff, GC
    Franklin, ME
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 179 (05): : 375 - 378
  • [46] APPENDECTOMY - OPEN OR LAPAROSCOPIC PROCEDURE
    METZGER, A
    KLAIBER, C
    FREI, E
    [J]. HELVETICA CHIRURGICA ACTA, 1992, 58 (06) : 841 - 845
  • [47] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
    M. Marzouk
    M. Khater
    M. Elsadek
    A. Abdelmoghny
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2003, 17 (5): : 721 - 724
  • [48] LAPAROSCOPIC IS NOT SUPERIOR TO OPEN APPENDECTOMY
    APELGREN, KN
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1994, 8 (05): : 376 - 376
  • [49] Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
    Nguyen, NT
    Zainabadi, K
    Mavandadi, S
    Paya, M
    Stevens, CM
    Root, J
    Wilson, SE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (06): : 813 - 818
  • [50] Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis
    Piskun, G
    Kozik, D
    Rajpal, S
    Shaftan, G
    Fogler, R
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (07): : 660 - 662