An assessment of tools for UML class diagram modeling: support to adaptation and integration with other tools

被引:1
|
作者
Massago, Mamoru [1 ]
Colanzi, Thelma Elita [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Maringa, Dept Informat, Maringa, Parana, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1145/3364641.3364643
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The software development process comprises a set of activities with the goal of developing high quality software. The software architecture design is a key activity of the software development processs as it allows the specification and visualization of products from different and structured point of views. One of the most used architectural views is the logical one, which represents the classes and their relationships. For this reason, the UML class diagram is one of the most used UML diagrams by software engineers [1]. Many companies use CASE (Computer-Aided Software Engineering) tools to carry out several software engineering activities, including modeling class diagrams. They are looking for independence and flexibility to adapt and integrate tools through the adoption of open-source tools, but this is not an easy task as there are a lot of CASE tools and most of them are incompatible. This problem arises when it is necessary to integrate tools to perform software engineering activity that needs to receive a UML class diagram as input. In this sense, the objective of this work is to assist software engineers in the selection of the tools by presenting results of a systematic review, whose goal was identifying existing free and open-source tools for UML class diagram modeling and analyzing their support to adaptation and integration with other tools. Twelve tools for UML class diagrams modeling were found and an analysis of their support to adaptation and integration with other tools was carried out. This analysis is useful in the choice and use of such kind of tool, either in industry or academic research.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 19
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Developing Tools for the Integration of Mining with other Land Uses
    Kivinen, Mari
    Eilu, Pasi
    Kangas, Katja
    Tuulentie, Seija
    Helenius, Heidi
    Simila, Jukka
    [J]. MINERAL RESOURCES IN A SUSTAINABLE WORLD, VOLS 1-5, 2015, : 1535 - 1538
  • [32] How are UML class diagrams built in practice? A usability study of two UML tools: Magicdraw and Papyrus
    Planas, Elena
    Cabot, Jordi
    [J]. COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES, 2020, 67
  • [33] Wind Integration and the Need for Advanced Decision Support Tools
    Philbrick, C. R.
    [J]. 2011 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2011,
  • [34] Communication tools and their support for integration in transdisciplinary research projects
    Fischer, Cornelia
    Radinger-Peer, Verena
    Krainer, Larissa
    Penker, Marianne
    [J]. HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [35] Communication tools and their support for integration in transdisciplinary research projects
    Cornelia Fischer
    Verena Radinger-Peer
    Larissa Krainer
    Marianne Penker
    [J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11
  • [36] Comparability of the NCSE with other assessment tools.
    Abraham, E
    Axelrod, BN
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 1996, 10 (03): : 334 - 334
  • [37] DECISION-SUPPORT TOOLS AND ASSESSMENT METHODS
    Hromada, Eduard
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE BUILDING AND REFURBISHMENT FOR NEXT GENERATIONS, 2013, : 669 - 672
  • [38] Decision-support tools for the assessment process
    Whelan, G
    Pelton, MA
    Dorow, KE
    [J]. BROWNFIELDS: MULTIMEDIA MODELLING AND ASSESSMENT, 2004, : 1 - 10
  • [39] A systematic review of tools that support peer assessment
    Luxton-Reilly, Andrew
    [J]. COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2009, 19 (04) : 209 - 232
  • [40] Sustainability assessment tools to support aquaculture development
    Samuel-Fitwi, Biniam
    Wuertz, Sven
    Schroeder, Jan P.
    Schulz, Carsten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 32 : 183 - 192