Evolution of the Genotype-to-Phenotype Map and the Cost of Pleiotropy in Mammals

被引:15
|
作者
Porto, Arthur [1 ,2 ]
Schmelter, Ryan [3 ]
VandeBerg, John L. [2 ]
Marroig, Gabriel [4 ]
Cheverud, James M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Biol, Campus Box 1137, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Univ Texas Rio Grande Valley, South Texas Diabet & Obes Inst, Brownsville, TX 78520 USA
[3] Loyola Univ Chicago, Dept Biol, Chicago, IL 60660 USA
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Lab Evolucao Mamiferos, Dept Genet Biol & Evolut, Inst Biociencias, BR-05508090 Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
complexity; genetic architecture; marsupials; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; NEW-WORLD MONKEYS; MORPHOLOGICAL INTEGRATION; MONODELPHIS-DOMESTICA; MANDIBULAR MORPHOLOGY; G-MATRIX; GENETIC ARCHITECTURE; LABORATORY OPOSSUMS; COMPLEX TRAITS; MODULARITY;
D O I
10.1534/genetics.116.189431
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Evolutionary studies have long emphasized that the genetic architecture of traits holds important microevolutionary consequences. Yet, studies comparing the genetic architecture of traits across species are rare, and discussions of the evolution of genetic systems are made on theoretical arguments rather than on empirical evidence. Here, we compared the genetic architecture of cranial traits in two different mammalian model organisms: the gray short-tailed opossum, Monodelphis domestica, and the laboratory mouse, Mus musculus. We show that both organisms share a highly polygenic genetic architecture for craniofacial traits, with many loci of small effect. However, these two model species differ significantly in the overall degree of pleiotropy, N, of the genotype-to-phenotype map, with opossums presenting a higher average N. They also diverge in their degree of genetic modularity, with opossums presenting less modular patterns of genetic association among traits. We argue that such differences highlight the context dependency of gene effects, with developmental systems shaping the variational properties of genetic systems. Finally, we also demonstrate based on the opossum data that current measurements for the relationship between the mutational effect size and N need to be re-evaluated in relation to the importance of the cost of pleiotropy for mammals.
引用
收藏
页码:1601 / +
页数:116
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Human sulfotransferase SULT2A1 pharmacogenetics: Genotype-to-phenotype studies
    Thomae B.A.
    Eckloff B.W.
    Freimuth R.R.
    Wieben E.D.
    Weinshilboum R.M.
    [J]. The Pharmacogenomics Journal, 2002, 2 (1) : 48 - 56
  • [32] An Informatics Project and Online "Knowledge Centre'' Supporting Modern Genotype-to-Phenotype Research
    Webb, Adam J.
    Thorisson, Gudmundur A.
    Brookes, Anthony J.
    [J]. HUMAN MUTATION, 2011, 32 (05) : 543 - 550
  • [33] Two decades of InterDrought conferences: are we bridging the genotype-to-phenotype gap? Preface
    Tuberosa, Roberto
    Turner, Neil C.
    Cakir, Mehmet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2014, 65 (21) : 6137 - 6139
  • [34] Modeling cardiomyocyte signaling and metabolism predicts genotype-to-phenotype mechanisms in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Khalilimeybodi A.
    Saucerman J.J.
    Rangamani P.
    [J]. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2024, 175
  • [35] Ethnicity-independent genetic basis of functional psychoses: A genotype-to-phenotype approach
    Stassen, HH
    Bridler, R
    Hell, D
    Weisbrod, M
    Scharfetter, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART B-NEUROPSYCHIATRIC GENETICS, 2004, 124B (01) : 101 - 112
  • [36] Using phenotypic plasticity to understand the structure and evolution of the genotype-phenotype map
    Chevin, Luis-Miguel
    Leung, Christelle
    Le Rouzic, Arnaud
    Uller, Tobias
    [J]. GENETICA, 2022, 150 (3-4) : 209 - 221
  • [37] Investigating genotype-to-phenotype correlation in CHARGE syndrome by deep phenotyping and multiparametric clustering
    Dana, Jeremy
    Dorval, Guillaume
    Martin, Christine Saint
    Belhous, Kahina
    Levy, Raphael
    Marlin, Sandrine
    De Bie, Isabelle
    Mautret-Godefroy, Manon
    Rausell, Antonio
    Rio, Marlene
    Boucher-Brischoux, Elise
    Attie-Bitach, Tania
    Boddaert, Nathalie
    Pingault, Veronique
    [J]. CLINICAL GENETICS, 2023, 104 (04) : 466 - 471
  • [38] The Genotype-to-Phenotype Dilemma: How Should Laboratories Approach Discordant Susceptibility Results?
    Yee, Rebecca
    Bard, Jennifer Dien
    Simner, Patricia J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (06)
  • [39] Unfolding the genotype-to-phenotype black box of cardiovascular diseases through cross-scale modeling
    Xi, Xi
    Li, Haochen
    Chen, Shengquan
    Lv, Tingting
    Ma, Tianxing
    Jiang, Rui
    Zhang, Ping
    Wong, Wing Hung
    Zhang, Xuegong
    [J]. ISCIENCE, 2022, 25 (08)
  • [40] Supporting Genotype-to-Phenotype Association Studies with Grid-enabled Knowledge Discovery Workflows
    Koumakis, Lefteris
    Moustakis, Vassilis
    Tsiknakis, Manolis
    Kafetzopoulos, Dimitris
    Potamias, George
    [J]. 2009 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-20, 2009, : 6958 - +