POLYTECHNIC STUDENTS' LEARNING EXPERIENCES WITH WEB 2.0 AS CONSTRUCTIVIST LEARNING TOOLS IN A PARTICIPATORY CULTURE

被引:0
|
作者
Ling, Michelle Yeo Mei [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Students' learning experiences; Collaborative Learning; Participatory Culture; and Web 2.0;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper aims to explore, describe and understand students' learning experiences with Web 2.0 technologies in school in Singapore. This paper will also look into the problems, the difficulties and the constraints that polytechnic students face with the use of Web 2.0 in learning. From an exploration of the students' experiences and attitudes with use of Web 2.0 for learning, this study hopes to develop a more in depth understanding of the characteristics integral to pedagogical practice and how students can leverage on worldwide knowledge as part of their learning experiences with Web 2.0 applications. The focus of this paper will be on a pragmatic exploration of Web 2.0 applications such as Blogs, YouTube, Wikis and Facebook as illustrative and typical examples of technologies that reflect the changing landscape of our students' learning. Clearly, the choice of these four applications does not delimit the categorisation of Web 2.0 tools to only these four; however, by limiting the choice to an exploration of blogs, YouTube, Facebook and Wikis as illustrative of Web 2.0 I hope that this will provide some starting frames of reference for using Web 2.0 for teaching and learning. Through a mixed-method approach by interpretation of quantitative data through a survey of polytechnic students within the School of Business faculty in Singapore followed by a qualitative approach of one on one interviews with students, I hope to gain an in-depth understanding of students' learning experiences with Web 2.0 learning technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 39
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Participatory Design of the Participatory Culture: Students' Projections of e-Learning 2.0
    Palaigeorgiou, George
    Triantafyllakos, George
    Tsinakos, Avgoustos
    [J]. BEST PRACTICES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY: KNOWLEDGE, LEARNING, DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY FOR ALL, 2009, 49 : 119 - +
  • [2] Students' conceptions and experiences of Web 2.0 tools
    Virkus, Sirje
    Bamigbola, Alice A.
    [J]. NEW LIBRARY WORLD, 2011, 112 (11-12) : 479 - 489
  • [3] Using Web 2.0 Learning Tools: Two Virtual Experiences.
    Fernandez, M. A.
    Munoz, M. J.
    Rivera, J. M.
    Leon, R.
    Escrig, E.
    Ferrero, I
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED ICT AND EDUCATION, 2013, 33 : 471 - 474
  • [4] Culture, learning styles, and Web 2.0
    Olaniran, Bolanle A.
    [J]. INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2009, 17 (04) : 261 - 271
  • [5] Motivating STEM Students to Use Web 2.0 Tools for Learning: A Case Study
    Durovic, Gordan
    Dlab, Martina Holenko
    Hoic-Bozic, Natasa
    [J]. 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND PROCESSING (ICIMP 2018), 2018, : 140 - 144
  • [6] USING WEB 2.0 AND ONTOLOGIES AS LEARNING TOOLS
    Leon, Raul
    Ferrero, Idoya
    Jesus Munoz, Maria
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2010), 2010, : 4962 - 4970
  • [7] Blended Learning Approach with Web 2.0 Tools
    Tulaboev, Azamjon
    [J]. 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICRIIS), 2013, : 118 - 122
  • [8] USE OF WEB 2.0 TOOLS ON "BIODIVERSITY" IN LEARNING
    Toper, O.
    Paker, O.
    Ozel, S.
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED), 2018, : 9603 - 9607
  • [9] On Recommending Web 2.0 Tools to Personalise Learning
    Juskevicene, Anita
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    [J]. INFORMATICS IN EDUCATION, 2014, 13 (01): : 17 - 31
  • [10] What if undergraduate students designed their own web learning environment? Exploring students' web 2.0 mentality through participatory design
    Palaigeorgiou, G.
    Triantafyllakos, G.
    Tsinakos, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2011, 27 (02) : 146 - 159