A Comparison of Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint and Choice-Based Conjoint to Determine Key Choice Attributes of Sour Cream with Limited Sample Size

被引:50
|
作者
Jervis, S. M. [1 ]
Ennis, J. M. [2 ]
Drake, M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, SE Dairy Foods Res Ctr, Dept Food Bioproc & Nutr Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Inst Percept, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS; POLYHEDRAL METHODS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/joss.12009
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Adaptive choice-based conjoint (ACBC) analysis is a technique that uses choice data and incorporates it into an adaptive interviewing experience. ACBC analysis has been suggested to provide more accurate information at the individual level, which can lead to better predictions even when using smaller sample sizes. A comparison of a traditional choice-based conjoint (CBC) survey and an ACBC survey was undertaken to compare the overall utility scores and importance values of attributes determined by both techniques using sour cream as the subject. A CBC and an ACBC survey were conducted. More respondents participated in the CBC (n?=?777) survey than in the ACBC version (n?=?250). Respondents to the ACBC version were from the same pool of respondents to the CBC version. A random sample of 250 respondents from the CBC survey was also analyzed. Results were analyzed by overall utility scores, importance values, landscape segmentation analysis and cluster analysis via latent class. The ACBC and CBC results were similar in overall utility scores for all attributes with similar respondent clusters. Both techniques revealed fat content as the most important attribute, followed by price and followed by brand. The CBC result for 250 respondents overestimated the importance of brand. The ACBC utility scores were not as distinct as CBC results in all categories; however, the direction of the mean utility scores was the same in all categories. Overall, ACBC and CBC revealed similar outcomes for different sour cream product types when price was excluded; however, the CBC results differentiated products to a greater extent than ACBC with the same sample size considered. Practical Applications Conjoint analysis is a research technique widely utilized across multiple industries as a way of determining the utility of a product or a product feature. Adaptive choice-based conjoint (ACBC) is a new form of conjoint analysis. Because of the format of ACBC studies, respondents may be more engaged in the survey-taking experience and provide answers that are more in-line with their actual choice behavior. Because of this, ACBC studies may reveal more accurate responses for specific attributes such as brand and/or price. ACBC studies may also require fewer respondents, which is advantageous when the audience is highly selective, or if money and/or time is a concern.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 462
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predicting dentists' decisions: a choice-based conjoint analysis of Medicaid participation
    Kateeb, Elham T.
    McKernan, Susan C.
    Gaeth, Gary J.
    Kuthy, Raymond A.
    Adrianse, Nancy B.
    Damiano, Peter C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DENTISTRY, 2016, 76 (03) : 171 - 178
  • [42] Multimodal preference heterogeneity in choice-based conjoint analysis: a simulation study
    Goeken N.
    Kurz P.
    Steiner W.J.
    [J]. Journal of Business Economics, 2024, 94 (1) : 137 - 185
  • [43] A cross-validity comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models
    Moore, WL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MARKETING, 2004, 21 (03) : 299 - 312
  • [44] Patient preferences in the choice of antirheumatic treatment: A choice-based conjoint analysis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
    Kessler, Verena
    Schirmer, Norbert
    Knuerr, Hanna
    Barth, Simon
    Sailer, Florian
    Holzkaemper, Thorsten
    [J]. GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT, 2018, 23 (06): : 307 - 319
  • [45] Choice-Based Conjoint Model for Evaluating Consumers' Purchasing Preferences for Battery Electric Vehicle Attributes
    Lee, Yueh-Hua
    Wang, Chin-Mei
    Lee, Wen-Ting
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS & STATISTICS, 2014, 52 (01): : 159 - 171
  • [46] Modeling the anti-cyberbullying preferences of university students: Adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis
    Cunningham, Charles E.
    Chen, Yvonne
    Vaillancourt, Tracy
    Rimas, Heather
    Deal, Ken
    Cunningham, Lesley J.
    Ratcliffe, Jenna
    [J]. AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, 2015, 41 (04) : 369 - 385
  • [47] Preferences for pain clinical trial characteristics: an ACTTION adaptive choice-based conjoint survey study
    Smith, S.
    Gewandter, J.
    Kitt, R.
    Cowan, P.
    Markman, J.
    Vaughan, J.
    Sadosky, A.
    Tive, L.
    Turk, D.
    Dworkin, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 17 (04): : S26 - S26
  • [48] Entrepreneurial branding: measuring consumer preferences through choice-based conjoint analysis
    Eggers, Fabian
    Eggers, Felix
    Kraus, Sascha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 12 (02) : 427 - 444
  • [49] Evaluation of urology trainee preferences in didactic education: a choice-based conjoint analysis
    Li, Yi
    Spradling, Kyle
    Allen, Isabel Elaine
    Conti, Simon
    Hampson, Lindsay A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [50] User Acceptance and Willingness to Pay for Connected Vehicle Technologies Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis
    Shin, Hyeon-Shic
    Callow, Michael
    Dadvar, Seyedehsan
    Lee, Young-Jae
    Farkas, Z. Andrew
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2015, (2531) : 54 - 62