The paradox of the "paradox of the plankton"

被引:28
|
作者
Record, Nicholas R. [1 ]
Pershing, Andrew J. [2 ]
Maps, Frederic [3 ]
机构
[1] Bowdoin Coll, Dept Earth & Oceanog Sci, Brunswick, ME 04011 USA
[2] Univ Maine, Sch Marine Sci, Orono, ME 04469 USA
[3] Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Maurice Lamontagne Inst, Mont Joli, PQ G5H 3Z4, Canada
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
biodiversity; ecosystem modelling; NPZ; paradox of the plankton; plankton; ECOSYSTEM MODEL; BIODIVERSITY; COEXISTENCE; COMMUNITIES; MECHANISMS; DIVERSITY; DYNAMICS; OCEAN;
D O I
10.1093/icesjms/fst049
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
One of the central orienting questions in biodiversity theory and ecology is the "paradox of the plankton", which asks how it is possible for many species to coexist on limited resources given the tendency for competition to exclude species. Over the past five decades, ecologists have offered dozens of solutions to the paradox, invoking game theory, chaos, stochastics, and many other concepts. Despite the plentitude of solutions to the paradox, ecologists continue to offer up novel solutions. Ocean modellers are now faced with the opposite paradox: given the overabundance and the diversity of solutions to the paradox, what is the appropriate way to build coexistence into ecosystem models? Ocean ecosystem models have a very standardized form-nutrient-phytoplankton-zooplankton (NPZ)-type systems of differential equations-where competitive exclusion is a common model behaviour. We suggest approaching the problem from the perspective of community-level patterns. We offer a prototype for building coexistence into NPZ models. The model allows for diverse assemblages of phytoplankton or zooplankton groups to persist and produces accurate community-level patterns. The approach is simple, adding only one additional parameter, and allows us to test the effects of trait distributions and environmental variables on diversity.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 240
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TWAIL: a Paradox within a Paradox
    al Attar, Mohsen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY LAW REVIEW, 2020, 22 (02) : 163 - 196
  • [42] Is the hippocrates paradox really a paradox?
    Cheng, TO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (03) : 505 - 505
  • [43] A PARADOX - A MOST INGENIOUS PARADOX
    MACADAM, DL
    [J]. COLOR RESEARCH AND APPLICATION, 1992, 17 (05): : 366 - 366
  • [44] A paradox solves a paradox, paradoxically
    Iredale, Mathew
    [J]. TPM-THE PHILOSOPHERS MAGAZINE, 2008, (41): : 44 - 46
  • [45] THE PARADOX OF OBSERVATION AND THE OBSERVATION OF PARADOX
    KOLEN, JF
    POLLACK, JB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & THEORETICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1995, 7 (03) : 275 - 277
  • [46] Paradox theory and the paradox of success
    Pina e Cunha, Miguel
    Putnam, Linda L.
    [J]. STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2019, 17 (01) : 95 - 106
  • [47] GIBBS-PARADOX PARADOX
    CASPER, BM
    FREIER, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1973, 41 (04) : 509 - 511
  • [48] IS THE LIAR PARADOX A SEMANTIC PARADOX?
    Ladov, Vsevolod
    [J]. SCHOLE-FILOSOFSKOE ANTIKOVEDENIE I KLASSICHESKAYA TRADITSIYA-SCHOLE-ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY AND THE CLASSICAL TRADITION, 2019, 13 (01): : 285 - 293
  • [49] PARADOX AND COUNTER-PARADOX
    CHARTIER, JP
    [J]. REVUE FRANCAISE DE PSYCHANALYSE, 1980, 44 (3-4): : 707 - 712
  • [50] PARADOX 9: HERACLITUS' PARADOX
    Clark, Michael
    [J]. THINK-PHILOSOPHY FOR EVERYONE, 2005, 3 (09): : 59 - 62