Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Marine SOx Scrubber Systems

被引:4
|
作者
Jee, Jaehoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Mokpo Natl Maritime Univ, Div Marine Engn & Coast Guard, Mokpo 58628, South Korea
关键词
MCDA; LCA; LCCA; fuzzy-TOPSIS; fuzzy-AHP; open-loop scrubber systems; closed-loop scrubber systems; hybrid scrubber systems; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.3390/jmse10111599
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
This paper aims to identify the best solution for three SOx scrubber systems by evaluating their economic, environmental and technical performances: open-loop, closed-loop and hybrid scrubber systems. It adopted a novel muti-criteria decision-making model which can be introduced as the combination of lifecycle cost and lifecycle assessments, and fuzzy-TOPSIS and fuzzy-AHP. The analysis results of the case study of 72,100 gross-ton cargo ships suggested that the closed-loop scrubber systems would be the most effective in the consideration of all of the aspects, overall. It also shows the excellence of the proposed decision-making model to remedy the shortcomings of the conventional multi-criteria decision-making process by directing the analytic process in a wiser way, by means of fuzzy elements. For the environmental impact assessment, the lifecycle assessment approach enables one to obtain a holistic view of the Lifecycle emissions from the cradle to the grave. This paper finally shows the effectiveness of the proposed method, which can improve confidence in decision-making by extending a short-term view widely. Therefore, it was strongly believed that the proposed model is not necessarily/limitedly applied to marine systems but can be broad and noteworthy for a variety of studies requiring appropriate decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparison of two multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Akhavi, F
    Hayes, C
    2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 956 - 961
  • [42] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Heterogeneous Multiprocessor Scheduling
    Saroja, S.
    Revathi, T.
    Auluck, Nitin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2018, 17 (05) : 1399 - 1427
  • [43] Modified approach to PROMETHEE for multi-criteria decision-making
    Radojicic, Miroslav
    Zizovic, Malisa
    Nesic, Zoran
    Vasovic, Jasmina Vesic
    MAEJO INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 7 (03) : 408 - 421
  • [44] A Model for Linguistic Dynamic Multi-criteria Decision-Making
    Jiang, Le
    Liu, Hongbin
    Martinez, Luis
    Cai, Jianfeng
    FOUNDATIONS OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (ISKE 2013), 2014, 277 : 939 - 949
  • [45] Happiness at work: a multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dahiya, Rinki
    Raghuvanshi, Juhi
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (04) : 459 - 482
  • [46] A fuzzy multi-criteria emergency decision-making method
    Wu, Wen-Shuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    Shi, Yong
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2012, 32 (06): : 1298 - 1304
  • [47] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (04) : 315 - 322
  • [48] Decision-making for multi-criteria optimization of process planning
    Arquis E.
    Delolme L.
    Antomarchi A.-L.
    Durieux S.
    Duc E.
    Mechanics and Industry, 2019, 20
  • [49] Multiclass Classification Based on Multi-criteria Decision-making
    Baloochian, Hossein
    Ghaffary, Hamid Reza
    JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 2019, 36 (01) : 140 - 151
  • [50] Fuzzy α-discounting method for multi-criteria decision-making
    Karaman, Atilla
    Dagdeviren, Metin
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERS, 2015, 38 (07) : 855 - 865