Multiparametric comparison of CARvedilol, vs. NEbivolol, vs. BIsoprolol in moderate heart failure: The CARNEBI trial

被引:63
|
作者
Contini, Mauro [1 ]
Apostolo, Anna [1 ]
Cattadori, Gaia [1 ]
Paolillo, Stefania [1 ,2 ]
Iorio, Annamaria [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Bertella, Erika [1 ]
Salvioni, Elisabetta [1 ]
Alimento, Marina [1 ]
Farina, Stefania [1 ]
Palermo, Pietro [1 ]
Loguercio, Monica [1 ]
Mantegazza, Valentina [1 ]
Karsten, Marlus [5 ]
Sciomer, Susanna [6 ]
Magri, Damiano [7 ]
Fiorentini, Cesare [1 ,9 ]
Agostoni, Piergiuseppe [1 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS, Ctr Cardiol Monzino, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Clin Med Cardiovasc & Immunol Sci, Naples, Italy
[3] Osped Riuniti, Cardiovasc Dept, Trieste, Italy
[4] Univ Trieste, Trieste, Italy
[5] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Dept Fisioterapia, Lab Fisioterapia Cardiovasc, Nucleo Pesquisa Exercicio Fis, BR-13560 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[6] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dipartimento Sci Cardiovasc & Resp, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[7] Univ Roma La Sapienza, S Andrea Hosp, Dipartimento Med Clin & Mol, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[8] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Sci Clin & Comunia, Milan, Italy
[9] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care & Med, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
beta-Blockers; Ventilation efficiency; Hypoxia; Chemoreflex; PULMONARY-EDEMA; VENTILATORY RESPONSE; DIFFUSING-CAPACITY; SIMULATED ALTITUDE; EXERCISE CAPACITY; LUNG-FUNCTION; METOPROLOL; EFFICIENCY; TRANSPORT; HYPOXIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.277
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Several beta-blockers, with different pharmacological characteristics, are available for heart failure (HF) treatment. We compared Carvedilol (beta 1-beta 2-alpha-blocker), Bisoprolol (beta 1-blocker), and Nebivolol (beta 1-blocker, NO-releasing activity). Methods: Sixty-one moderate HF patients completed a cross-over randomized trial, receiving, for 2 months each, Carvedilol, Nebivolol, Bisoprolol (25.6 +/- 12.6, 5.0 +/- 2.4 and 5.0 +/- 2.4 mg daily, respectively). At the end of each period, patients underwent: clinical evaluation, laboratory testing, echocardiography, spirometry (including total DLCO and membrane diffusion), O-2/CO2 chemoreceptor sensitivity, constant workload, in normoxia and hypoxia (FiO(2)=16%), and maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test. Results: No significant differences were observed for clinical evaluation (NYHA classification, Minnesota questionnaire), laboratory findings (including kidney function and BNP), echocardiography, and lung mechanics. DLCO was lower on Carvedilol (18.3 +/- 4.8* mL/min/mm Hg) compared to Nebivolol (19.9 +/- 5.1) and Bisoprolol (20.0 +/- 5.0) due to membrane diffusion 20% reduction (*=p<0.0001). Constant workload exercise showed in hypoxia a faster VO2 kinetic and a lower ventilation with Carvedilol. Peripheral and central sensitivity to CO2 was lower in Carvedilol while response to hypoxia was higher in Bisoprolol. Ventilation efficiency (VE/VCO2 slope) was 26.9 +/- 4.1* (Carvedilol), 28.8 +/- 4.0 (Nebivolol), and 29.0 +/- 4.4 (Bisoprolol). Peak VO2 was 15.8 +/- 3.6* mL/kg/min (Carvedilol), 16.9 +/- 4.1 (Nebivolol), and 16.9 +/- 3.6 (Bisoprolol). Conclusions: beta-Blockers differently affect several cardiopulmonary functions. Lung diffusion and exercise performance, the former likely due to lower interference with beta 2-mediated alveolar fluid clearance, were higher in Nebivolol and Bisoprolol. On the other hand, Carvedilol allowed a better ventilation efficiency during exercise, likely via a different chemoreceptor modulation. Results from this study represent the basis for identifying the best match between a specific beta-blocker and a specific HF patient. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2134 / 2140
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Single MRI vs. Multiparametric MRI in GBM Image Data
    Zhang, Y.
    Chen, D. T.
    Grass, G. D.
    Yu, H. H. M.
    Zhang, G. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E257 - E257
  • [22] Electrophysiological Remodeling in Heart Failure Dyssynchrony vs. Resynchronization
    Aiba, Takeshi
    Tomaselli, Gordon F.
    Shimizu, Wataru
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2010, 26 (02) : 79 - 90
  • [24] Comparison of carvedilol vs. metoprolol on bioconversion of glyceroltrinitrate during concomitant nitrate therapy
    Fink, N
    Brunner, HP
    Fink, B
    CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (19) : 386 - 386
  • [25] Comparative Effects of Carvedilol vs Bisoprolol for Severe Congestive Heart Failure - Special Reference to Atrial Fibrillation
    Konishi, Masanori
    Haraguchi, Go
    Kimura, Shigeki
    Inagaki, Hiroshi
    Kawabata, Mihoko
    Hachiya, Hitoshi
    Hirao, Kenzo
    Isobe, Mitsuaki
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2010, 74 (06) : 1127 - 1134
  • [26] Visibility Graph Analysis of Heartbeat Time Series: Comparison of Young vs. Old, Healthy vs. Diseased, Rest vs. Exercise, and Sedentary vs. Active
    Munoz-Diosdado, Alejandro
    Solis-Montufar, Eric E.
    Zamora-Justo, Jose A.
    ENTROPY, 2023, 25 (04)
  • [27] Secondary prophylaxis for variceal bleeding: carvedilol vs. propranolol
    Steib, Christian J.
    Gerbes, Alexander L.
    HEPATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 11 (02) : 141 - 142
  • [28] Secondary prophylaxis for variceal bleeding: carvedilol vs. propranolol
    Christian J. Steib
    Alexander L. Gerbes
    Hepatology International, 2017, 11 : 141 - 142
  • [29] Defining the Characteristics of Heart Failure Patients: Diastolic vs. Systolic Failure
    McCoy, N.
    Barton, J.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 182 : S175 - S176
  • [30] Salty Battle to Sudden Death: Young vs. Old, Brain vs. Heart
    Iyer, Shruthi H.
    Simeone, Kristina A.
    EPILEPSY CURRENTS, 2024, 24 (06) : 437 - 439