Comparison of oncological outcomes after laparoscopic transhiatal and open esophagectomy for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma

被引:16
|
作者
Saha, Arin Kumar [1 ,2 ]
Sutton, Christopher D. [2 ]
Sue-Ling, Henry [2 ]
Dexter, Simon P. L. [2 ]
Sarela, Abeezar I. [2 ]
机构
[1] Gen Infirm, Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[2] St James Hosp, Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Upper GI Surg, Bexley Wing, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Barrett's oesophagus < oesophageal; Oesophageal < cancer; BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; 5-YEAR SURVIVAL; CANCER; EXPERIENCE; CARCINOMA; MORTALITY; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-008-0065-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study compared pathological characteristics and patterns of disease recurrence for patients with pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with either laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy or open esophagectomy. From January 2000-December 2006, 44 patients had pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma after esophagectomy. No patients had neoadjuvant treatment. Twenty-four patients had an Ivor Lewis operation, 4 had an open transhiatal and 16 had a laparoscopic transhiatal operation. There were 37 men. The median age was 64 years (range 35-80 years). Median lymph node yield was 19 (10-51) after an Ivor Lewis operation, 16 (3-28) after an open transhiatal operation and 15 (4-41) after a laparoscopic transhiatal operation. There were two in-hospital deaths (5%), both following open Ivor Lewis operation. All patients in the laparoscopic group had N0 disease; none received adjuvant treatment. Two patients (7%) in the open group had N1 disease, of whom one patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. Eleven patients had submucosal invasion. Alive patients had median follow-up of 36 months (range 5-87 months). One patient in the laparoscopic group had recurrence at 22 months. This patient had poorly differentiated N0 disease which was limited to the mucosa and died at 24 months. Two patients in the open group developed recurrence, at 6 months (N0 disease with submucosal invasion) and 8 months (N1 disease with submucosal invasion) and died at 7 and 14 months, respectively. Both patients had poorly differentiated tumours. The second patient with N1 disease is alive and well at 14 months. Estimated survival (Kaplan-Meier) at 3 years was 93%. As compared with open transthoracic esophagectomy, there is no oncological detriment in the treatment of pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma by laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. The incidence of recurrence is small (7%) but can occur even in patients with tumour limited to the mucosa or N0 disease.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 124
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes after endoscopic mucosal resection or esophagectomy for submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Nelson, David B.
    Dhupar, Rajeev
    Katkhuda, Riham
    Correa, Arlene
    Goltsov, Alexei
    Maru, Dipen
    Sepesi, Boris
    Antonoff, Mara B.
    Mehran, Reza J.
    Rice, David C.
    Vaporciyan, Ara A.
    Davila, Marta
    Davila, Raquel
    Betancourt, Sonia
    Ajani, Jaffer
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 156 (01): : 406 - +
  • [32] Research Paper: Comparison of Short-term Outcome of Thoracoscopic-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Transhiatal Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer
    Kermani, Tomaj Asvadi
    Rasihashemi, Seyed Ziaeddin
    Feyzi, Moein Hoseinpour
    Toomatari, Seyed Ehsan Mousavai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL TOXICOLOGY AND FORENSIC MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (01):
  • [33] Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy Discussion
    Durning, Jonathan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 199 (05): : 598 - 598
  • [34] Comparison of outcomes following minimally invasive versus transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer; a case control study
    Rizvi, F.
    Syed, A. A.
    Khattak, S.
    Khan, A. R.
    Zia, W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 : S10 - S11
  • [35] Laparoscopic Transhiatal Esophagectomy Improves Hospital Outcomes and Reduces Cost: A Single-institution Cohort Analysis of Laparoscopic and Open Techniques
    Ecker, B.
    Savulionyte, G.
    Datta, J.
    Dumon, K.
    Williams, N.
    Kucharczuk, J.
    Dempsey, D.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 : S154 - S154
  • [36] Comparison of oncological outcomes after open and laparoscopic re-resection of incidental gallbladder cancer
    Vega, E. A.
    De Aretxabala, X.
    Qiao, W.
    Newhook, T. E.
    Okuno, M.
    Castillo, F.
    Sanhueza, M.
    Diaz, C.
    Cavada, G.
    Jarufe, N.
    Munoz, C.
    Rencoret, G.
    Vivanco, M.
    Joechle, K.
    Tzeng, C. -W. D.
    Vauthey, J. -N.
    Vinuela, E.
    Conrad, C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 (03) : 289 - 300
  • [37] To resect or not to resect: The decision in T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Louie, Brian E.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 153 (05): : 1208 - 1208
  • [38] Outcomes after esophagectomy for pT1 adenocarcinoma
    Saha, A. K.
    Sutton, C.
    Sue-Ling, H. M.
    Dexter, S. P.
    Sarela, A. I.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 : 85 - 86
  • [39] Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction
    Sugita, Shizuki
    Kinoshita, Takahiro
    Kaito, Akio
    Watanabe, Masahiro
    Sunagawa, Hideki
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (01): : 383 - 390
  • [40] Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma
    Kauppi, Juha
    Rasanen, Jari
    Sihvo, Eero
    Huuhtanen, Riikka
    Nelskyla, Kaisa
    Salo, Jarmo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (09): : 2614 - 2619