The Changing Face of Phase 1 Cancer Clinical Trials

被引:18
|
作者
Craft, Barbara S. [2 ]
Kurzrock, Razelle [2 ]
Lei, Xiudong [3 ]
Herbst, Roy
Lippman, Scott
Fu, Siqing [2 ,4 ]
Karp, Daniel D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Thorac Head & Neck Med Oncol, Unit 432, Clin & Translat Res Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Phase Program 1, Div Canc Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
phase 1 cancer clinical trials; cancer drug development; research infrastructure; protocol requirement; NONCYTOTOXIC AGENTS; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; ONCOLOGY TRIALS; END-POINTS; DESIGN; INSTITUTE; BENEFITS; RISKS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.24171
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Phase 1 studies in cancer have changed in recent years. Now, with the advent of new, less toxic, targeted agents, more patients may be candidates for new drug studies earlier in the course of their disease. It is to the advantage of the members of the oncology community to know more regarding the details and requirements for participation in early-phase clinical trials so they can advocate for their patients and help them decide when such trials may be an appropriate choice. To examine the work intensity of early phase cancer clinical trials, the authors of this report compared the study requirements of phase I and 2 protocols. Five parameters were studied as a surrogate of study complexity-the number of physical examinations, vital sign determinations, electrocardiograms (ECGs), nonpharmacokinetic laboratory tests, and pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling-in the first 4 weeks of protocol in 90 studies (49 phase I studies and 41 phase 2 studies). From July 2004 through March 2007, there were 49 phase I trials in the phase 1 Program, 9 phase 2 studies that were conducted by physicians appointed in that program, and 32 phase 2 trials with accessible data in the Department of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology. In the phase 1 trials versus the phase 2 trials, there were significantly more (P < .05) physical examinations (mean standard error, 3.16 +/- 0.24 vs 2.22 +/- 0.13), vital sign determinations (5.63 +/- 0.61 vs 2.80 +/- 0.26), ECGs (4.36 +/- 1.16 vs 0.80 +/- 0.17), nonpharmacokinetic laboratory tests (18.08 +/- 1.31 vs 10.12 +/- 0.65), and PK sampling (15.14 +/- 1.79 vs 1.02 +/- 0.53). These values also differed significantly (P < .005 for each) when the median values were compared in nonparametric tests. Although both phase 1 and phase 2 trials had substantial study requirements, those for the phase 1 studies were significantly higher. The successful conduct of early-phase clinical trials requires significant research infrastructure. Cancer 2009;115:1592-7. (C) 2009 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1592 / 1597
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The changing face of lung cancer
    Barnes, DJ
    CHEST, 2004, 126 (06) : 1718 - 1721
  • [42] Randomised Phase 1 clinical trials in oncology
    Iasonos, Alexia
    O'Quigley, John
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 125 (07) : 920 - 926
  • [43] Randomised Phase 1 clinical trials in oncology
    Alexia Iasonos
    John O’Quigley
    British Journal of Cancer, 2021, 125 : 920 - 926
  • [44] Clinical Trial Diversity: Outcomes for US patients with advanced cancer in Phase 1 clinical trials at a major cancer center
    Davidson, Tara M.
    Roszik, Jason
    Kang, Lei
    Le, Hung
    Campbell, Erick
    Ozenne, Cherri
    Dumbrava, Ecatarina Cathy
    Fu, Siquing
    Hong, David S.
    Karp, Daniel D.
    Naing, Aung
    Piha-Paul, Sarina A.
    Rodon, Jordi
    Tsimberidou, Apostolia M.
    Yap, Timothy A.
    Meric-Bernstam, Funda
    Subbiah, Vivek
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (12)
  • [45] Clinical outcomes of advanced stage cancer patients treated with sequential immunotherapy in phase 1 clinical trials
    Dylan J. Martini
    Yuan Liu
    Julie M. Shabto
    Colleen Lewis
    Meredith R. Kline
    Hannah Collins
    Mehmet Akce
    Haydn T. Kissick
    Bradley C. Carthon
    Walid L. Shaib
    Olatunji B. Alese
    Rathi N. Pillai
    Conor E. Steuer
    Christina S. Wu
    David H. Lawson
    Ragini R. Kudchadkar
    Viraj A. Master
    Bassel F. El-Rayes
    Suresh S. Ramalingam
    Taofeek K. Owonikoko
    R. Donald Harvey
    Mehmet Asim Bilen
    Investigational New Drugs, 2019, 37 : 1198 - 1206
  • [46] Clinical outcomes of advanced stage cancer patients treated with sequential immunotherapy in phase 1 clinical trials
    Martini, Dylan J.
    Liu, Yuan
    Shabto, Julie M.
    Lewis, Colleen
    Kline, Meredith R.
    Collins, Hannah
    Akce, Mehmet
    Kissick, Haydn T.
    Carthon, Bradley C.
    Shaib, Walid L.
    Alese, Olatunji B.
    Pillai, Rathi N.
    Steuer, Conor E.
    Wu, Christina S.
    Lawson, David H.
    Kudchadkar, Ragini R.
    Master, Viraj A.
    El-Rayes, Bassel F.
    Ramalingam, Suresh S.
    Owonikoko, Taofeek K.
    Harvey, R. Donald
    Bilen, Mehmet Asim
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2019, 37 (06) : 1198 - 1206
  • [47] Survival and clinical outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer who were treated on phase 1 clinical trials
    Corr, Bradley R.
    Moroney, Marisa
    Sheeder, Jeanelle
    Eckhardt, S. Gail
    Sawyer, Brandon
    Behbakht, Kian
    Diamond, Jennifer R.
    CANCER, 2020, 126 (19) : 4289 - 4293
  • [48] Suspension of accrual in phase II cancer clinical trials
    Li, Yimei
    Mick, Rosemarie
    Heitjan, Daniel F.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2015, 12 (02) : 34 - 44
  • [49] Phase I and II Clinical Trials for Gastric Cancer
    Khushalani, Nikhil I.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 21 (01) : 113 - +
  • [50] Current phase III breast cancer clinical trials
    不详
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2006, 20 (07): : 696 - +