Visual size perception and haptic calibration during development

被引:41
|
作者
Gori, Monica [1 ]
Giuliana, Luana [2 ]
Sandini, Giulio [1 ]
Burr, David [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ist Italiano Tecnol, Robot Brain & Cognit Sci Dept, I-16163 Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Psychol, I-50121 Florence, Italy
[3] CNR Inst Neurosci, Pisa, Italy
关键词
CONSTANCY; CHILDREN; DISTANCE; TEXTURE; INFANTS; RECALIBRATION; INFORMATION; SENSITIVITY; JUDGMENTS; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.2012.01183.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
It is still unclear how the visual system perceives accurately the size of objects at different distances. One suggestion, dating back to Berkeley's famous essay, is that vision is calibrated by touch. If so, we may expect different mechanisms involved for near, reachable distances and far, unreachable distances. To study how the haptic system calibrates vision we measured size constancy in children (from 6 to 16 years of age) and adults, at various distances. At all ages, accuracy of the visual size perception changes with distance, and is almost veridical inside the haptic workspace, in agreement with the idea that the haptic system acts to calibrate visual size perception. Outside this space, systematic errors occurred, which varied with age. Adults tended to overestimate visual size of distant objects (over-compensation for distance), while children younger than 14 underestimated their size (under-compensation). At 16 years of age there seemed to be a transition point, with veridical perception of distant objects. When young subjects were allowed to touch the object inside the haptic workspace, the visual biases disappeared, while older subjects showed multisensory integration. All results are consistent with the idea that the haptic system can be used to calibrate visual size perception during development, more effectively within than outside the haptic workspace, and that the calibration mechanisms are different in children than in adults.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 862
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Visual and haptic interaction on virtual haptic roughness perception with different lightness
    Hu, Wanhua
    Lin, Tao
    Sakai, Kazuo
    Imamiya, Atsumi
    Omata, Masaki
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IASTED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2005, : 126 - 131
  • [22] The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape
    Norman, JF
    Norman, HF
    Clayton, AM
    Lianekhammy, J
    Zielke, G
    PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2004, 66 (02): : 342 - 351
  • [23] Perception of synchronization errors in Haptic and Visual Communications
    Kameyama, Seiji
    Ishibashi, Yutaka
    MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS IX, 2006, 6391
  • [24] Haptic estimates of discordant visual—haptic size vary developmentally
    Giovanni F. Mjsceo
    Wayne A. Hershberger
    Ronda L. Mancini
    Perception & Psychophysics, 1999, 61 (4): : 608 - 614
  • [25] The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape
    J. Farley Norman
    Hideko F. Norman
    Anna Marie Clayton
    Joann Lianekhammy
    Gina Zielke
    Perception & Psychophysics, 2004, 66 : 342 - 351
  • [26] VISUAL AND HAPTIC ANGLE PERCEPTION IN MATCHING TASK
    APPELLE, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 84 (04): : 487 - &
  • [27] PROPORTION JUDGMENTS IN HAPTIC AND VISUAL FORM PERCEPTION
    APPELLE, S
    GRAVETTER, FJ
    DAVIDSON, PW
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1980, 34 (02): : 161 - 174
  • [28] Can visual imagery modulate haptic perception?
    Scocchia, L. G.
    Loomis, J.
    Stucchi, N.
    PERCEPTION, 2007, 36 : 210 - 210
  • [29] Haptic feedback affects visual perception of surfaces
    Ernst, M. O.
    Banks, M. S.
    Buelthoff, H. H.
    PERCEPTION, 1999, 28 : 106 - 106
  • [30] Combining Visual and Haptic Cues in Weight Perception
    Kristiansen, Olaf
    Scheller, Meike
    Aston, Stacey J.
    Nardini, Marko
    PERCEPTION, 2022, 51 : 52 - 52