Policy, institutional and market barriers to the implementation of clean development mechanisms (CDM) in China

被引:10
|
作者
Zeng, L [1 ]
Yan, JY
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Appl Phys & Mech Engn, SE-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[2] Malardalen Univ, Dept Publ Technol, Vasteras, Sweden
关键词
clean development mechanism; carbon dioxide; GHG mitigation; energy efficiency; renewable energy; climate change; Kyoto protocol; China;
D O I
10.1080/01971520500198809
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
China is the second largest emitter of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the world, with potentially about two thirds of total Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) for Asia on the world carbon market (Gruetter, 2002). Since 68% of its primary energy is from coal, China's average energy intensity is 7.5 times higher titan the EU and 4.3 times higher than the US (EU, 2003). Therefore, introducing advanced clean technologies and management to China represents opportunities for Annex I countries to obtain low-cost CERs through CDM projects, and access to one of the largest potential energy conservation markets in the world. CDM can provide a win-win solution for both China and Annex I countries, and the Chinese government considers that the introduction of CDM projects can bring advanced energy technologies and foreign investment to China, thereby helping China's sustainable economy and generating CERs. As energy efficiency is generally low and carbon intensity is high in both China's energy supply and demand sectors, numerous options exist for cost-effective energy conservation and GHG mitigation with CDM. This paper reviews current Chinese policies and administrative and institutional settings for CDM cooperation, and discusses existing policy, institutional and other barriers in the energy market by drawing on observations and experience from previous initiatives such as Cleaner Production and energy efficiency. Some options to remove these barriers are addressed. In order to make CDM projects feasible, China's government needs to promote awareness, streamline administrative systems, and be more active in budding a competitive edge in the world carbon market.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:259 / 271
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Changing Money Market and Monetary Policy Operations in China: an institutional perspective
    Leung, Man-Kwong
    Lu, Qianjin
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY CHINA, 2011, 20 (69) : 287 - 305
  • [32] CDM's influence on technology transfers: A study of the implemented clean development mechanism projects in China
    Zhang, Chi
    Yan, Jinyue
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 158 : 355 - 365
  • [33] Development and implementation of a standardized institutional contrast material administration policy
    Weber, TM
    Kenney, PJ
    Berland, LL
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 110 - 110
  • [34] The impact of the CDM (clean development mechanism) on the cost price of wind power electricity: A China study
    Zhao, Zhen-Yu
    Li, Zhi-Wei
    Xia, Bo
    ENERGY, 2014, 69 : 179 - 185
  • [35] Development status, policy, and market mechanisms for battery energy storage in the US, China, Australia, and the UK
    Sun, Jin
    Liu, Jing
    Wang, Yangguang
    Yuan, Huihong
    Yan, Ze
    JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [37] Torn between state and market: Private policy implementation and conflicting institutional logics
    Thomann, Eva
    Lieberherr, Eva
    Ingold, Karin
    POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 35 (01) : 57 - 69
  • [38] Policy study on development and utilization of clean coal technology in China
    Lu, Xin
    Yu, Zhufeng
    Wu, Lixin
    Yu, Jie
    Chen, Guifeng
    Fan, Maohong
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 89 (04) : 475 - 484
  • [39] Barriers and opportunities of using the clean development mechanism to advance renewable energy development in China
    Wang, Qiang
    Chen, Yong
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (07): : 1989 - 1998
  • [40] Policy implementation barriers and economic analysis of shore power promotion in China
    Yin, Ming
    Wang, Yi
    Zhang, Qiang
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 87