The Impact of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Interventions to Control Cholera: A Systematic Review

被引:143
|
作者
Taylor, Dawn L. [1 ,2 ]
Kahawita, Tanya M. [1 ]
Cairncross, Sandy [1 ]
Ensink, Jeroen H. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Environm Hlth Grp, London WC1E 7HT, England
[2] Med Sans Frontieres Artsen Zonder Grenzen, NL-1001 EA Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 08期
关键词
DRINKING-WATER; SOLAR DISINFECTION; RISK-FACTORS; TRANSMISSION; OUTBREAK; DIARRHEA; STORAGE; O1; CHLORINATION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0135676
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and Methods Cholera remains a significant threat to global public health with an estimated 100,000 deaths per year. Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions are frequently employed to control outbreaks though evidence regarding their effectiveness is often missing. This paper presents a systematic literature review investigating the function, use and impact of WASH interventions implemented to control cholera. Results The review yielded eighteen studies and of the five studies reporting on health impact, four reported outcomes associated with water treatment at the point of use, and one with the provision of improved water and sanitation infrastructure. Furthermore, whilst the reporting of function and use of interventions has become more common in recent publications, the quality of studies remains low. The majority of papers (>60%) described water quality interventions, with those at the water source focussing on ineffective chlorination of wells, and the remaining being applied at the point of use. Interventions such as filtration, solar disinfection and distribution of chlorine products were implemented but their limitations regarding the need for adherence and correct use were not fully considered. Hand washing and hygiene interventions address several transmission routes but only 22% of the studies attempted to evaluate them and mainly focussed on improving knowledge and uptake of messages but not necessarily translating this into safer practices. The use and maintenance of safe water storage containers was only evaluated once, under-estimating the considerable potential for contamination between collection and use. This problem was confirmed in another study evaluating methods of container disinfection. One study investigated uptake of household disinfection kits which were accepted by the target population. A single study in an endemic setting compared a combination of interventions to improve water and sanitation infrastructure, and the resulting reductions in cholera incidence. Discussion and Recommendations This review highlights a focus on particular routes of transmission, and the limited number of interventions tested during outbreaks. There is a distinct gap in knowledge of which interventions are most appropriate for a given context and as such a clear need for more robust impact studies evaluating a wider array of WASH interventions, in order to ensure effective cholera control and the best use of limited resources.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adaptation of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions: A Model and Scoping Review of Key Concepts and Tools
    Anderson, Darcy M.
    Birken, Sarah A.
    Bartram, Jamie K.
    Freeman, Matthew C.
    FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2022, 2
  • [32] Tailoring of the ongoing water, sanitation and hygiene interventions for prevention and control of COVID-19
    Mushi, Vivian
    Shao, Magdalena
    TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HEALTH, 2020, 48 (01)
  • [33] Tailoring of the ongoing water, sanitation and hygiene interventions for prevention and control of COVID-19
    Vivian Mushi
    Magdalena Shao
    Tropical Medicine and Health, 48
  • [34] Ultraviolet sensitivity of WASH (water, sanitation, and hygiene) -related helminths: A systematic review
    Hazell, Lucinda
    Braun, Laura
    Templeton, Michael R.
    PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2019, 13 (09):
  • [35] Indicators for Monitoring Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene: A Systematic Review of Indicator Selection Methods
    Schwemlein, Stefanie
    Cronk, Ryan
    Bartram, Jamie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 13 (03)
  • [36] Mozambique’s response to cyclone Idai: how collaboration and surveillance with water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions were used to control a cholera epidemic
    Domingos Lequechane Joaquim
    Mahumane Arlete
    Chale Falume
    Nhabomba Crescêncio
    Salom?o Cristolde
    Lameira Clemente
    Chicumbe Sérgio
    Semá Baltazar Cynthia
    贫困所致传染病(英文), 2020, 09 (03) : 121 - 124
  • [37] Mozambique's response to cyclone Idai: how collaboration and surveillance with water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions were used to control a cholera epidemic
    Lequechane, Joaquim Domingos
    Mahumane, Arlete
    Chale, Falume
    Nhabomba, Crescendo
    Salomao, Cristolde
    Lameira, Clemente
    Chicumbe, Sergio
    Baltazar, Cynthia Sema
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES OF POVERTY, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [38] Mozambique’s response to cyclone Idai: how collaboration and surveillance with water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions were used to control a cholera epidemic
    Joaquim Domingos Lequechane
    Arlete Mahumane
    Falume Chale
    Crescêncio Nhabomba
    Cristolde Salomão
    Clemente Lameira
    Sérgio Chicumbe
    Cynthia Semá Baltazar
    Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 9
  • [39] Associations of water, sanitation, and hygiene with typhoid fever in case–control studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chaelin Kim
    Gerard R. Goucher
    Birkneh Tilahun Tadesse
    Woojoo Lee
    Kaja Abbas
    Jong-Hoon Kim
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 23
  • [40] Effects of single and combined water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions on nutritional status of children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zemichael Gizaw
    Alemayehu Worku
    Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 45