The Impact of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Interventions to Control Cholera: A Systematic Review

被引:143
|
作者
Taylor, Dawn L. [1 ,2 ]
Kahawita, Tanya M. [1 ]
Cairncross, Sandy [1 ]
Ensink, Jeroen H. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Environm Hlth Grp, London WC1E 7HT, England
[2] Med Sans Frontieres Artsen Zonder Grenzen, NL-1001 EA Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 08期
关键词
DRINKING-WATER; SOLAR DISINFECTION; RISK-FACTORS; TRANSMISSION; OUTBREAK; DIARRHEA; STORAGE; O1; CHLORINATION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0135676
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and Methods Cholera remains a significant threat to global public health with an estimated 100,000 deaths per year. Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions are frequently employed to control outbreaks though evidence regarding their effectiveness is often missing. This paper presents a systematic literature review investigating the function, use and impact of WASH interventions implemented to control cholera. Results The review yielded eighteen studies and of the five studies reporting on health impact, four reported outcomes associated with water treatment at the point of use, and one with the provision of improved water and sanitation infrastructure. Furthermore, whilst the reporting of function and use of interventions has become more common in recent publications, the quality of studies remains low. The majority of papers (>60%) described water quality interventions, with those at the water source focussing on ineffective chlorination of wells, and the remaining being applied at the point of use. Interventions such as filtration, solar disinfection and distribution of chlorine products were implemented but their limitations regarding the need for adherence and correct use were not fully considered. Hand washing and hygiene interventions address several transmission routes but only 22% of the studies attempted to evaluate them and mainly focussed on improving knowledge and uptake of messages but not necessarily translating this into safer practices. The use and maintenance of safe water storage containers was only evaluated once, under-estimating the considerable potential for contamination between collection and use. This problem was confirmed in another study evaluating methods of container disinfection. One study investigated uptake of household disinfection kits which were accepted by the target population. A single study in an endemic setting compared a combination of interventions to improve water and sanitation infrastructure, and the resulting reductions in cholera incidence. Discussion and Recommendations This review highlights a focus on particular routes of transmission, and the limited number of interventions tested during outbreaks. There is a distinct gap in knowledge of which interventions are most appropriate for a given context and as such a clear need for more robust impact studies evaluating a wider array of WASH interventions, in order to ensure effective cholera control and the best use of limited resources.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustained adoption of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions: systematic review
    Martin, Nina A.
    Hulland, Kristyna R. S.
    Dreibelbis, Robert
    Sultana, Farhana
    Winch, Peter J.
    [J]. TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH, 2018, 23 (02) : 122 - 135
  • [2] Vaccines plus water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions in the fight against cholera
    Ivers, Louise C.
    [J]. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2017, 5 (04): : E395 - E395
  • [3] Prevention and control of cholera with household and community water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions: A scoping review of current international guidelines
    D'Mello-Guyett, Lauren
    Gallandat, Karin
    Van den Bergh, Rafael
    Taylor, Dawn
    Bulit, Gregory
    Legros, Dominique
    Maes, Peter
    Checchi, Francesco
    Cumming, Oliver
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [4] The Impact of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions on the Health and Well-Being of People Living With HIV: A Systematic Review
    Yates, Travis
    Lantagne, Daniele
    Mintz, Eric
    Quick, Robert
    [J]. JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2015, 68 : S318 - S330
  • [5] The cost of a knowledge silo: a systematic re-review of water, sanitation and hygiene interventions
    Loevinsohn, Michael
    Mehta, Lyla
    Cuming, Katie
    Nicol, Alan
    Cumming, Oliver
    Ensink, Jeroen H. J.
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2015, 30 (05) : 660 - 674
  • [6] Delivering water, sanitation and hygiene interventions to women and children in conflict settings: a systematic review
    Als, Daina
    Meteke, Sarah
    Stefopulos, Marianne
    Gaffey, Michelle F.
    Kamali, Mahdis
    Munyuzangabo, Mariella
    Shah, Shailja
    Jain, Reena P.
    Radhakrishnan, Amruta
    Siddiqui, Fahad J.
    Ataullahjan, Anushka
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 5
  • [7] Water, sanitation and hygiene interventions and the prevention and treatment of childhood acute malnutrition: A systematic review
    Patlan-Hernandez, Alan R.
    Stobaugh, Heather C.
    Cumming, Oliver
    Angioletti, Andrea
    Pantchova, Danka
    Lapegue, Jean
    Stern, Stephanie
    N'Diaye, Dieynaba S.
    [J]. MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION, 2022, 18 (01):
  • [8] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association between Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Exposures and Cholera in Case-Control Studies
    Wolfe, Marlene
    Kaur, Mehar
    Yates, Travis
    Woodin, Mark
    Lantagne, Daniele
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2018, 99 (02): : 534 - 545
  • [9] Safe water, sanitation, hygiene, and a cholera vaccine
    Azman, Andrew S.
    Clvers, Louise
    Legros, Dominique
    Luquero, Francisco J.
    Mintz, Eric D.
    [J]. LANCET, 2016, 387 (10013): : 28 - 28
  • [10] Water, sanitation and hygiene in developing countries: interventions and diarrhoea - a review
    Fewtrell, L
    Colford, JM
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 52 (08) : 133 - 142