Long-term and cross-reactive immunogenicity of inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine in the elderly: MF59-adjuvanted vaccine versus unadjuvanted vaccine

被引:28
|
作者
Song, Joon Young [1 ,2 ]
Cheong, Hee Jin [1 ,2 ]
Noh, Ji Yun [1 ]
Seo, Yu Bin [1 ]
Choi, Won Suk [1 ]
Cho, Geum Joo [3 ]
Hwang, Taik Gun [3 ]
Kim, Woo Joo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Div Infect Dis, Seoul 152703, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Coll Med, APII, Seoul 152703, South Korea
[3] Guro Gu Publ Hlth Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
immunogenicity; influenza vaccine; elderly; MF59; adjuvant; VIRUS; SUBUNIT; PROTECTION; SEASONS; SAFETY; STRAIN;
D O I
10.1002/jmv.23630
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Elderly people are at great risk for influenza-related serious complications. However, influenza vaccine-induced antibodies are believed to decline more rapidly in the elderly. This study was designed to evaluate the long-term and cross-reactive immunogenicity among those aged 65 years for two seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines during the 2009-2010 influenza season. One vaccine had the MF59 adjuvant, while the other did not contain an adjuvant. Serum hemagglutinin inhibition (HI) titers were determined pre-vaccination and at 1 and 6 months post-vaccination. Of the 100 subjects, 95 (95%) were followed-up for 1 month after vaccination, and 76 (76%) were followed-up for 6 months after vaccination. Both vaccines met the European Medicines Agency (EMA) criteria 1 month after vaccination. However, seroprotection for influenza B was not satisfactory, with a rate of 55.3% for the MF59 adjuvant vaccine and 47.9% for the vaccine without adjuvant. At 6 months post-vaccination, the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine showed a higher seroprotection rate than the unadjuvanted vaccine. At this point, the MF59-adjuvanated vaccine still met the criteria of EMA for A/H1N1 (62.5% vs. 55.5%, P=0.64) and A/H3N2 (72.5% vs. 47.2%, P=0.04). Both vaccines showed excellent cross-reactive immunogenicity for influenza A/Solomon Island/3/2006 (H1N1) and A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2), without significant differences. In comparison, cross-reactive immunogenicity was not remarkable for the A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) and A/New Caledonia/20/1999 (H1N1) strains, which have a greater antigenic distance. In conclusion, the MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine showed superior long-term immunogenicity in the elderly compared to the unadjuvanted vaccine. However, cross-reactive immunogenicity was not remarkably enhanced with the MF59 adjuvant. J. Med. Virol. 85:1591-1597, 2013. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1591 / 1597
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Immunogenicity of low-dose MF59-adjuvanted 2009 influenza A/H1N1 vaccine in dialysis patients
    Jungmin Son
    Soo Bong Lee
    Dong Won Lee
    Il Young Kim
    Su Jin Lee
    Sun Min Lee
    Sang Heon Song
    Eun Young Seong
    Ihm Soo Kwak
    Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 2013, 17 : 275 - 283
  • [42] Long-term immunogenicity of a virosomal subunit inactivated influenza vaccine in children with asthma
    Zuccotti, Gianvincenzo
    Amendola, Antonella
    Vigano, Alessandra
    Pariani, Elena
    Zappa, Alessandra
    Pogliani, Laura
    Giacomet, Vania
    Savarino, Antonino
    Podesta, Alberto
    Rottoli, Arnilcare
    Tanzi, Elisabetta
    Zanetti, Alessandro
    Radaelli, Giovanni
    VACCINE, 2007, 25 (37-38) : 6692 - 6698
  • [43] Long-term immunogenicity of an inactivated virosome hepatitis A vaccine
    Bovier, PA
    Bock, J
    Loutan, L
    Farinelli, T
    Glueck, R
    Herzog, C
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2002, 68 (04) : 489 - 493
  • [44] Effectiveness of the MF59-adjuvanted trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine among adults aged 65 or older; a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kennedy, Alex
    Sanderson, Ruth
    McGovern, Ian
    Haag, Mendel
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2021, 40 : 67 - 68
  • [45] Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety evaluation of an MF59-adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza virus vaccine compared with non-adjuvanted influenza vaccine in children: a multicentre, randomised controlled, observer-blinded, phase 3 trial
    Vesikari, Timo
    Kirstein, Judith
    Devota Go, Grace
    Leav, Brett
    Ruzycky, Mary Ellen
    Isakov, Leah
    de Bruijn, Marianne
    Oberye, Janine
    Heijnen, Esther
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (05): : 345 - 356
  • [46] Is the adjuvanted influenza vaccine more effective than the trivalent inactivated vaccine in the elderly population? Results of a case-control study
    Spadea, A.
    Unim, B.
    Colamesta, V.
    Meneghini, A.
    D'Amici, A. M.
    Giudiceandrea, B.
    La Torre, G.
    VACCINE, 2014, 32 (41) : 5290 - 5294
  • [47] Relative Effectiveness of the MF59-Adjuvanted Influenza Vaccine Versus High-Dose Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults With Influenza Risk Factors During the 2019-2020 US Influenza Season
    Imran, Mahrukh
    Mills, Carrie W.
    McDermott, Kimberly W.
    Dean, Alex
    Bogdanov, Alina
    McGovern, Ian
    Haag, Mendel D. M.
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 11 (08):
  • [48] Trial of 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Monovalent MF59-Adjuvanted Vaccine.
    Clark, Tristan W.
    Pareek, Manish
    Hoschler, Katja
    Dillon, Helen
    Nicholson, Karl G.
    Groth, Nicola
    Stephenson, Iain
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (25): : 2424 - 2435
  • [49] Immunogenicity of aIIV3, MF59-adjuvanted seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine, in older adults ≥65 years of age: Meta-analysis of cumulative clinical experience
    Nicolay, Uwe
    Heijnen, Esther
    Nacci, Pantaleo
    Patriarca, Peter A.
    Leave, Brett
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 85 : S1 - S9
  • [50] Immunogenicity of trivalent influenza vaccines in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis: MF59-adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted vaccines
    Noh, Ji Yun
    Song, Joon Young
    Choi, Won Suk
    Lee, Jacob
    Bin Seo, Yu
    Kwon, Young Joo
    Ko, Gang Jee
    Cha, Dae Ryong
    Kang, Young Sun
    Lee, Young-Ki
    Cheong, Hee Jin
    Kim, Woo Joo
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2016, 12 (11) : 2902 - 2908