Thiazolidinedione therapy and breast cancer risk in diabetic women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:19
|
作者
Du, Rui [1 ]
Lin, Lin [1 ]
Cheng, Di [1 ]
Xu, Yu [1 ]
Xu, Min [1 ]
Chen, Yuhong [1 ]
Wang, Weiqing [1 ]
Bi, Yufang [1 ]
Li, Donghui [2 ]
Lu, Jieli [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Inst Endocrine & Metab Dis, Ruijin Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Metab Dis,Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
antidiabetic drugs; breast cancer; diabetes; meta-analysis; systematic review; TZDs; OBSERVATIONAL FOLLOW-UP; DECREASED RISK; METFORMIN; INSULIN; COHORT; ROSIGLITAZONE; PIOGLITAZONE; OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1002/dmrr.2961
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Rising experimental evidence suggests that thiazolidinediones (TZDs) exert a protective effect on breast cancer. However, studies concerning this issue were inconsistent and limited. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis with data from currently available studies to evaluate the effect of TZDs on breast cancer risk among diabetic women. We comprehensively searched for all pertinent studies addressing TZDs use and breast cancer risk published before January 1, 2016, in PubMed, Clinical Trials, and Cochrane Library. Data synthesis was performed in a random-effects model using Stata version 12.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, Texas). Fourteen independent studies were eventually selected in this meta-analysis, including 5 randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), 7 cohort studies, and 2 case-control studies. No significant associations of TZD use and risk of breast cancer were observed in the RCTs (pooled risk ratio [RR]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-1.53, I-2=26%) or case-control studies (pooled odds ratio, 0.99, 95% CI, 0.76-1.28, I-2=31%). A 19% reduction in breast cancer risk (pooled RR: 0.81, 95% CI, 0.66-0.99, I-2=72%) was found in the cohort studies. However, after removing the study with the smallest event number and the greatest effect size, the association became nonsignificant with greatly decreased heterogeneity (pooled RR: 0.94, 95% CI, 0.86-1.03, I-2=16%). This meta-analysis did not find any significant association between TZDs use and risk of breast cancer among diabetic women.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Breast cancer risk factors in Iran: A systematic review & meta-analysis
    Shamshirian, A.
    Heydari, K.
    Shams, Z.
    Aref, A. R.
    Shamshirian, D.
    Tamtaji, O. R.
    Asemi, Z.
    Mirzaei, H.
    Mohammadi, N.
    Zibaee, B.
    Karimifar, K.
    Zarandi, B.
    Hedayatizadeh-Omran, A.
    Alizadeh-Navaei, R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S318 - S318
  • [32] Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Brennan, Sarah F.
    Cantwell, Marie M.
    Cardwell, Chris R.
    Velentzis, Louiza S.
    Woodside, Jayne V.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2010, 91 (05): : 1294 - 1302
  • [33] Intrauterine environments and breast cancer risk: meta-analysis and systematic review
    Park, Sue Kyung
    Kang, Daehee
    McGlynn, Katherine A.
    Garcia-Closas, Montserrat
    Kim, Yeonju
    Yoo, Keun Young
    Brinton, Louise A.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (01)
  • [34] Night work and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Megdal, SP
    Kroenke, CH
    Laden, F
    Pukkala, E
    Schernhammer, ES
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 41 (13) : 2023 - 2032
  • [35] Risk of metachronous contralateral breast cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Akdeniz, D.
    Schmidt, M. K.
    McCool, D.
    van den Broek, A. J.
    Hauptmann, M.
    Seynaeve, C. M.
    Steyerberg, E. W.
    Hooning, M. J.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77
  • [36] Digitalis Use and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Chen
    Xie, Shao-Hua
    Xu, Bingfei
    Lu, Shi
    Liu, Pian
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 40 (04) : 285 - 292
  • [37] A systematic review and meta-analysis on tubal ligation and breast cancer risk
    Nazila Najdi
    Arezoo Esmailzadeh
    Maryam Shokrpour
    Somayeh Nikfar
    Seyedeh Zahra Razavi
    Mahdi Sepidarkish
    Saman Maroufizadeh
    Saeid Safiri
    Amir Almasi-Hashiani
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [38] Breast cancer risk factors in Iran: a systematic review & meta-analysis
    Shamshirian, Amir
    Heydari, Keyvan
    Shams, Zahra
    Aref, Amir Reza
    Shamshirian, Danial
    Tamtaji, Omid Reza
    Asemi, Zatollah
    Shojaie, Layla
    Mirzaei, Hamed
    Mohammadi, Neda
    Zibaee, Behdad
    Karimifar, Keyvan
    Zarandi, Bahman
    Hedayatizadeh-Omran, Akbar
    Alizadeh-Navaei, Reza
    [J]. HORMONE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2020, 41 (04)
  • [39] Folate intake and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martin Tio
    Juliana Andrici
    Guy D. Eslick
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2014, 145 : 513 - 524
  • [40] Primary HT and risk for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Angelousi, Anna G.
    Anagnostou, Valsamo K.
    Stamatakos, Michael K.
    Georgiopoulos, Georgios A.
    Kontzoglou, Konstantinos C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 166 (03) : 373 - 381