Uncertainty Quantification in Flood Inundation Mapping Using Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimate and Sensitivity Analysis

被引:77
|
作者
Jung, Younghun [1 ]
Merwade, Venkatesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Flood inundation mapping; GLUE; Likelihood measure; Sensitivity analysis; HEC-RAS; Uncertainty; RESOLUTION TOPOGRAPHIC DATA; RIVER FLOOD; GRID SIZE; MODEL; CALIBRATION; IMPACT; FUTURE; RISK; GLUE; PREDICTIONS;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000476
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The process of creating flood inundation maps is affected by uncertainties in data, modeling approaches, parameters, and geo-processing tools. Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) is one of the popular techniques used to represent uncertainty in model predictions through Monte Carlo analysis coupled with Bayesian estimation. The objectives of this study are to (1) compare the uncertainty arising from multiple variables in flood inundation mapping using Monte Carlo simulations and GLUE and (2) investigate the role of subjective selection of the GLUE likelihood measure in quantifying uncertainty in flood inundation mapping. The role of the flow, topography, and roughness coefficient is investigated on the output of a one-dimensional Hydrologic Engineering Center-River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) model and flood inundation map for an observed flood event on East Fork White River near Seymour, Indiana (Seymour reach) and Strouds Creek in Orange County, North Carolina. Performance of GLUE is assessed by selecting three likelihood functions including the sum of absolute error (SAE) in water surface elevation and inundation width, sum of squared error (SSE) in water surface elevation and inundation width, and a statistic (F-statistic) on the basis of the area of observed and simulated flood inundation map. Results show that the uncertainty in topography, roughness and flow information created an uncertainty bound in the inundation area that ranged from 1.4 to 4.6% for Seymour reach and 4 to 29% for Strouds Creek of the base inundation areas. Additionally, flood inundation maps produced by applying GLUE have different uncertainty bounds depending on the selection of the likelihood functions. However, the overall difference in the flood inundation maps on the basis different likelihood functions is less than 2%, suggesting that the subjectivity involved in selecting the likelihood measure in GLUE did not create a significant effect on the overall uncertainty quantification in flood inundation mapping of the selected study areas. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000476. (C) 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 520
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Uncertainty Analysis of Stage-Discharge Curves by Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) Method
    Maghrebi, Mahmoud F.
    Vatanchi, Sajjad M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (04) : 447 - 458
  • [42] Uncertainty Analysis of Stage-Discharge Curves by Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) Method
    Mahmoud F. Maghrebi
    Sajjad M. Vatanchi
    [J]. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 2021, 26 : 447 - 458
  • [43] Uncertainty quantification using interval modeling with performance sensitivity
    Lew, Jiann-Shiun
    Horta, Lucas G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2007, 308 (1-2) : 330 - 336
  • [44] Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of seismic metabarriers
    Zeighami, Farhad
    Sandoval, Leonardo
    Guadagnini, Alberto
    Di Federico, Vittorio
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 277
  • [45] A guide to uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis for cardiovascular applications
    Eck, Vinzenz Gregor
    Donders, Wouter Paulus
    Sturdy, Jacob
    Feinberg, Jonathan
    Delhaas, Tammo
    Hellevik, Leif Rune
    Huberts, Wouter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 32 (08)
  • [46] Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models
    Harenberg, Daniel
    Marelli, Stefano
    Sudret, Bruno
    Winschel, Viktor
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS, 2019, 10 (01) : 1 - 41
  • [47] The impact of uncertainty in satellite data on the assessment of flood inundation models
    Stephens, E. M.
    Bates, P. D.
    Freer, J. E.
    Mason, D. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 414 : 162 - 173
  • [48] A Hydraulic MultiModel Ensemble Framework for Visualizing Flood Inundation Uncertainty
    Zarzar, Christopher M.
    Hosseiny, Hossein
    Siddique, Ridwan
    Gomez, Michael
    Smith, Virginia
    Mejia, Alfonso
    Dyer, Jamie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2018, 54 (04): : 807 - 819
  • [49] Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of package vibration reliability
    Zhu D.
    Wei J.
    [J]. Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40 (03): : 204 - 211
  • [50] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION AND GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVES USING KRIGING
    Gauchy, C.
    Feau, C.
    Garnier, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2024, 14 (04) : 39 - 63