Falls risk score removal does not impact inpatient falls: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial

被引:18
|
作者
Jellett, Joanna [1 ]
Williams, Cylie [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Clayton, Diana [1 ]
Plummer, Virginia [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Haines, Terry [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Peninsula Hlth, Falls Prevent Serv, Mornington, Vic, Australia
[2] Peninsula Hlth, Allied Hlth, Frankston, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Sch Primary & Allied Hlth Care, Frankston, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Natl Ctr Hlth Ageing, Frankston, Vic, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Frankston, Vic, Australia
[6] Peninsula Hlth, Continuous Educ & Dev Unit, Frankston, Vic, Australia
[7] Federat Univ Australia, Sch Hlth, Berwick, Vic, Australia
关键词
falls; falls prevention; risk assessment; screening; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; SCREENING TOOL; DESIGN; PREDICTION; INTERVIEWS; HOSPITALS;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.15471
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectives To investigate the impact of removing a falls risk screening tool from an overall falls risk assessment programme on the rate of falls, injurious falls and completion of falls prevention activities by staff. Background Falls in older patients are common adverse events in hospital settings. Screening and assessing individual patients for risk of falls are a common, but controversial element of falls prevention strategies in hospitals. Design A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial using a disinvestment approach. Methods This trial was carried out according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT). All patients were admitted to 20 health service wards (9 units) over the 10-month study period. The control condition contained a falls risk screening tool element, a full falls risk factor assessment and intervention provision section. In the intervention condition, only the full falls risk factor assessment and intervention provision section was applied, and the falls risk screening tool element was removed. Fall rates were extracted from hospital level data, files were audited for tool completion, and nurses surveyed about tool use. Results There did not appear to be an impact on the falls rate per month when the risk screening tool component was removed (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.84-favours intervention, 95%CI = 0.67 to 1.05,p = .14) nor on the falls rate with serious injury (IRR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.26 to 3.09,p = .87). There was a thirty-six second reduction of time per patient reported by staff to complete paperwork (p < .001). There was no difference in the proportion of patients for whom the tool was completed, nor the number of falls prevention interventions identified for implementation. Conclusion Removing the falls risk screening tool section did not negatively impact falls and reduced time spent completing falls prevention paperwork. Relevance to clinical practice Falls prevention is an important issue in health services. Removal of a screening risk tool is unlikely to impact falls. This has the potential to reduce nursing administration time that may be otherwise redirected to individual approaches to falls prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:4505 / 4513
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] High-sensitivity troponin in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Shah, Anoop S. V.
    Anand, Atul
    Strachan, Fiona E.
    Ferry, Amy V.
    Lee, Kuan Ken
    Chapman, Andrew R.
    Sandeman, Dennis
    Stables, Catherine L.
    Adamson, Philip D.
    Andrews, Jack P. M.
    Anwar, Mohamed S.
    Hung, John
    Moss, Alistair J.
    O'Brien, Rachel
    Berry, Colin
    Findlay, Iain
    Walker, Simon
    Cruickshank, Anne
    Reid, Alan
    Gray, Alasdair
    Collinson, Paul O.
    Apple, Fred S.
    McAllister, David A.
    Maguire, Donogh
    Fox, Keith A. A.
    Newby, David E.
    Tuck, Christopher
    Harkess, Ronald
    Parker, Richard A.
    Keerie, Catriona
    Weir, Christopher J.
    Mills, Nicholas L.
    [J]. LANCET, 2018, 392 (10151): : 919 - 928
  • [32] The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
    Martin, James Thomas
    Hemming, Karla
    Girling, Alan
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [33] Reducing Medical Admissions into Hospital through Optimising Medicines (REMAIN HOME) Study: protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial
    Foot, Holly
    Freeman, Christopher
    Hemming, Karla
    Scott, Ian
    Coombes, Ian D.
    Williams, Ian D.
    Connelly, Luke
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    Sturman, Nancy
    Kirsa, Sue
    Nicholson, Caroline
    Russell, Grant
    Kirkpatrick, Carl
    Cottrell, Neil
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (04):
  • [34] Promoting Independence Through quality dementia Care at Home (PITCH): a research protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Steven Savvas
    Anita M. Y. Goh
    Frances Batchelor
    Colleen Doyle
    Erica Wise
    Esther Tan
    Anita Panayiotou
    Sue Malta
    Margaret Winbolt
    Phillip Clarke
    Jason Burton
    Lee-Fay Low
    Samantha M. Loi
    Anne Fairhall
    Meg Polacsek
    Jay Stiles
    Fenny Muliadi
    Nadia Chau
    Samuel Scherer
    David Ames
    Tanara Vieira Sousa
    Briony Dow
    [J]. Trials, 22
  • [35] The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials
    James Thomas Martin
    Karla Hemming
    Alan Girling
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19
  • [36] Update to the study protocol: minimisation of dialysis risk in hospital patients with chronic kidney disease (MinDial): a multicentre, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial
    Stelzer, D.
    Binder, H.
    Glattacker, M.
    Graf, E.
    Hahn, M.
    Hollenbeck, M.
    Kaier, K.
    Kowall, B.
    Kuklik, N.
    Metzner, G.
    Mueller, N.
    Seiler, L.
    Stolpe, S.
    Blume, C.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [37] The use of feasibility studies for stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials: a review of impact and scope
    Kristunas, Caroline
    Hemming, Karla
    Eborall, Helen C.
    Gray, Laura J.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [38] Statistical analysis plan for the NU IMPACT stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial *
    Scholtens, Denise M.
    Lancki, Nicola
    Hemming, Karla
    Cella, David
    Smith, Justin D.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 143
  • [39] Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial
    Jones, Christopher W.
    Adams, Amanda
    Weaver, Mark A.
    Schroter, Sara
    Misemer, Benjamin S.
    Schriger, David
    Platts-Mills, Timothy F.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [40] Saving babies’ lives (SBL) – a programme to reduce neonatal mortality in rural Cambodia: study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial
    Kaajal Patel
    Sopheakneary Say
    Daly Leng
    Manila Prak
    Koung Lo
    Mavuto Mukaka
    Arthur Riedel
    Claudia Turner
    [J]. BMC Pediatrics, 21