Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions:: A robustness exercise

被引:366
|
作者
Galeotti, M
Lanza, A
Pauli, F
机构
[1] Fdn Eni Enrico Mattei, I-20123 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Milan, Italy
[3] Eni Spa, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Trieste, I-34014 Trieste, Italy
关键词
environment; growth; CO2; emissions; panel data;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.031
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The number of studies seeking to empirically characterize the reduced-form relationship between a country economic growth and the quantity of pollutants produced in the process has recently increased significantly. In several cases, researchers have found evidence pointing to an inverted-U "environmental Kuznets" curve. In the case of CO2, however, the evidence is at best mixed. In this paper, we reconsider that evidence by assessing how robust it is when the analysis is conducted in a different parametric setup and when using alternative emissions data, from the International Energy Agency, relative to the literature. Our contribution can be viewed as a robustness exercise in these two respects. The econometric results lead to two conclusions. Firstly, published evidence on the EKC does not appear to depend upon the source of the data, at least as far as carbon dioxide is concerned. Secondly, when an alternative functional form is employed, there is evidence of an inverted-U pattern for the group of OECD countries, with reasonable turning point, regardless of the data set employed. Not so for non-OECD countries as the EKC is basically increasing (slowly concave) according to the IEA data and more bellshaped in the case of CDIAC data. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 163
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emission in Mongolia: an empirical analysis
    Ahmed, Khalid
    Qazi, Ahmer Qasim
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2014, 25 (04) : 505 - 516
  • [42] Pooled mean group estimation of an environmental Kuznets curve for CO2
    Martínez-Zarzoso, I
    Bengochea-Morancho, A
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2004, 82 (01) : 121 - 126
  • [43] Economic complexity and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: sector-wise Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis
    Vahid Mohamad Taghvaee
    Mehrab Nodehi
    Behnaz Saboori
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 80860 - 80870
  • [44] Impact of subsectors of agriculture and economic growth on CO2 emissions in Pakistan: evidence from Environmental Kuznets Curve
    Shakoor, Abdul
    Ahmed, Roohi
    Ahmed, Zubair
    Khan, Uroosa
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (10) : 25728 - 25739
  • [45] Analysing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions in China using segmented equations and partial least squares
    Gao, Qian
    Meng, Ming
    Wen, Lei
    Niu, Dongxiao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2015, 7 (04) : 518 - 531
  • [46] Dynamic misspecification in the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from CO2 and SO2 emissions in the United Kingdom
    Fosten, Jack
    Morley, Bruce
    Taylor, Tim
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 76 : 25 - 33
  • [47] Beyond the Environmental Kuznets Curve:: a comparative study of SO2 and CO2 emissions between Japan and China
    Yaguchi, Yue
    Sonobe, Tetsushi
    Otsuka, Keijiro
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2007, 12 : 445 - 470
  • [48] Long run non-linearity in CO2 emissions: the I(2) cointegration model and the environmental Kuznets curve
    Bjørnar Karlsen Kivedal
    [J]. Empirica, 2023, 50 : 899 - 931
  • [49] A reexamination of the existence of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: evidence from G20 countries
    Luo, Guangyu
    Weng, Jia-Hsi
    Zhang, Qianxue
    Hao, Yu
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2017, 85 (02) : 1023 - 1042
  • [50] The environmental Kuznets curve at different levels of economic development: a counterfactual quantile regression analysis for CO2 emissions
    Yaduma, Natina
    Kortelainen, Mika
    Wossink, Ada
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2015, 4 (03) : 278 - 303