Optimization and economic evaluation of integrated natural gas liquids (NGL) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) processing for lean feed gas

被引:16
|
作者
Jin, Chunhe [1 ]
Lim, Youngsub [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Naval Architecture & Ocean Engn, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Res Inst Marine Syst Engn, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
关键词
Lean feed; Integrated process; Economic evaluation; Dual mixed refrigerant (DMR); Single mixed refrigerant (SMR); MIXED REFRIGERANT PROCESS; PROCESS CONFIGURATION; RECOVERY PROCESS; LIQUEFACTION; COPRODUCTION; ENERGY; DESIGN; SINGLE; ALTERNATIVES; OPERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.12.143
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
There is an increasing demand for economic evaluation of integrated liquefaction and natural gas liquids (NGL) recovery processes for lean feed. This paper performs economic analysis for the conventional liquefied natural gas (LNG) and NGL coproduction process compared to two proposed simple integrated processes considering the LNG higher heating value (HHV) specification under lean feed conditions. Dual mixed refrigerant (DMR) cycle was used for liquefaction in the conventional and one of the proposed processes. Single mixed refrigerant (SMR) cycle was selected for the other simplified proposed process, which has the advantage of lowering capital expenditure compared with the DMR cycle. The process schemes were built by the commercial software Aspen HYSYS, and a genetic algorithm (GA) was used for process optimization. The results show that the first proposed integrated process has economic advantages compared to the conventional scheme under the lean feed composition (which represents different results from previous studies reported under conventional feed conditions). Additionally, capital cost was reduced remarkably by simplifying the NGL recovery section with little loss of liquefaction efficiency. The second proposed process has the lowest capital expenditure and shows best profitability for plants operating for less than 15 months, but the liquefaction efficiency is lower than the other two schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:1265 / 1273
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Evaluation of Adsorbents for Natural Gas Dehydration at Liquefied Natural Gas Plant
    Mel'nikov, V. B.
    Fedorova, E. B.
    Gafarova, E. B.
    [J]. CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY OF FUELS AND OILS, 2020, 56 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [22] LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS
    不详
    [J]. CRYOGENICS, 1966, 6 (05) : 306 - &
  • [24] Prediction of the density for natural gas and liquefied natural gas mixtures
    Eslami, H
    [J]. AICHE JOURNAL, 2001, 47 (11) : 2585 - 2592
  • [25] Weathering prediction model for stored liquefied natural gas (LNG)
    Migliore, Calogero
    Tubilleja, Cristina
    Vesovic, Velisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 26 : 570 - 580
  • [26] Dividing-Wall Column for Fractionation of Natural Gas Liquids in Floating Liquefied Natural Gas Plants
    Halvorsen, Ivar J.
    Dejanovic, Igor
    Marak, Knut Arild
    Olujic, Zarko
    Skogestad, Sigurd
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 39 (12) : 2348 - 2354
  • [27] Excelerate Energy recently completed a liquefied natural gas (LNG)
    Thinnes, Billy
    [J]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2009, 88 (10): : 7 - 7
  • [28] Liquefied natural gas (LNG). Properties and use by fertilizer industry
    Borowiecki, Tadeusz
    Dmoch, Marek
    Franczyk, Ewelina
    Golebiowski, Andrzej
    Kowalik, Pawel
    Ryczkowski, Janusz
    [J]. PRZEMYSL CHEMICZNY, 2013, 92 (12): : 2331 - 2338
  • [29] OPTIMIZED UTILIZATION OF LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS (LNG) COLD ENERGY
    Si, Hongyu
    Mei, Ning
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL HEAT TRANSFER CONFERENCE - 2010, VOL 4: HEAT TRANSFER MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, HEAT TRANSFER EQUIPMENT, THERMOELECTRICS, 2010, : 157 - 166
  • [30] A review on liquefied natural gas (LNG) cold energy utilization
    Wang, Fang
    Fu, Yike
    Fan, Xiaowei
    Zhu, Caixia
    [J]. Huagong Jinzhan/Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2016, 35 (03): : 748 - 753