Mapping health outcome measures from a stroke registry to EQ-5D weights

被引:13
|
作者
Ghatnekar, Ola [1 ]
Eriksson, Marie [2 ]
Glader, Eva-Lotta [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, Umea, Sweden
[2] Umea Univ, Dept Stat, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
关键词
Mapping; Quality of life; Stroke; Sweden; Transfer to utility; Utility; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PREFERENCE-BASED MEASURE; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1186/1477-7525-11-34
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To map health outcome related variables from a national register, not part of any validated instrument, with EQ-5D weights among stroke patients. Methods: We used two cross-sectional data sets including patient characteristics, outcome variables and EQ-5D weights from the national Swedish stroke register. Three regression techniques were used on the estimation set (n = 272): ordinary least squares (OLS), Tobit, and censored least absolute deviation (CLAD). The regression coefficients for "dressing", "toileting", "mobility", "mood", "general health" and "proxy-responders" were applied to the validation set (n = 272), and the performance was analysed with mean absolute error (MAE) and mean square error (MSE). Results: The number of statistically significant coefficients varied by model, but all models generated consistent coefficients in terms of sign. Mean utility was underestimated in all models (least in OLS) and with lower variation (least in OLS) compared to the observed. The maximum attainable EQ-5D weight ranged from 0.90 (OLS) to 1.00 (Tobit and CLAD). Health states with utility weights <0.5 had greater errors than those with weights >= 0.5 (P < 0.01). Conclusion: This study indicates that it is possible to map non-validated health outcome measures from a stroke register into preference-based utilities to study the development of stroke care over time, and to compare with other conditions in terms of utility.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] UTILITIES OF THE EQ-5D: TRANSFERABLE OR NOT? INFLUENCE OF THE NATIONAL VALUE SETS OF THE EQ-5D ON THE INCREMENTAL UTILITIES OF TWO HEALTH STATES
    Knies, S.
    Evers, S. M. A. A.
    Severens, J. L.
    Candel, M. J. J. M.
    Ament, A. J. H. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A575 - A575
  • [42] COMPARING UK VALUE SETS AND MAPPING FUNCTIONS FOR EQ-5D
    Maervoet, J.
    Poirrier, J. E.
    Rudell, K.
    Bergemann, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S503 - S503
  • [43] Health Utilities Using the EQ-5D in Studies of Cancer
    A. Simon Pickard
    Caitlyn T. Wilke
    Hsiang-Wen Lin
    Andrew Lloyd
    PharmacoEconomics, 2007, 25 : 365 - 384
  • [45] MAPPING THE CCQ ONTO EQ-5D SCORES (IM)POSSIBLE?
    Boland, M. R. S.
    van Boven, J. F.
    Rutten-van Molken, M. P. M. H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A329 - A330
  • [46] APPLIED CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE EQ-5D HEALTH UTILITY INDEX
    Ghushchyan, V. H.
    Sullivan, P. W.
    Libby, A. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A8 - A8
  • [47] MAPPING THE INSOMNIA SEVERITY INDEX (ISI) TO THE EQ-5D UTILITIES
    Gu, N. Y.
    Ji, X.
    Bell, C.
    Botteman, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (03) : A208 - A208
  • [48] How stable are social preference weights for EQ-5D: Results from a partial replication study
    Macran, S
    Kind, P
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (06) : 606 - 606
  • [49] Improving valuation sampling of EQ-5D health states
    Adrian Bagust
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11
  • [50] Outcome assessment after hip fracture IS EQ-5D THE ANSWER?
    Parsons, N.
    Griffin, X. L.
    Achten, J.
    Costa, M. L.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2014, 3 (03): : 69 - 75