Reliability and validity of physical examination tests for the assessment of ankle instability

被引:1
|
作者
Beynon, Amber [1 ]
Le May, Sylvie [2 ,3 ]
Theroux, Jean [4 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Fac Med Hlth & Human Sci, Dept Chiropract, 75 Talavera Rd,Level 2, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[2] Univ Montreal, Fac Nursing, 2900 Boul Edouard Montpetit, Montreal, PQ H3T 1J4, Canada
[3] CHU St Justine Res Ctr, 3175 Chemin Cote St Catherine, Montreal, PQ H3T 1C5, Canada
[4] Murdoch Univ, Coll Sci Hlth Engn & Educ, 90 South St, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
关键词
Ankle; Sprain; Reliability; Validity; Orthopaedic tests; ANTERIOR DRAWER TEST; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CLINICAL-TESTS; SYNDESMOSIS INJURY; LIGAMENT; SPRAINS; CLASSIFICATION; METAANALYSIS; QUALITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s12998-022-00470-0
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Introduction: Clinicians rely on certain physical examination tests to diagnose and potentially grade ankle sprains and ankle instability. Diagnostic error and inaccurate prognosis may have important repercussions for clinical deci-sion-mak ing and patient outcomes. Therefore, it is important to recognize the diagnostic value of orthopaedic tests through understanding the reliability and validity of these tests.Objective: To systematically review and report evidence on the reliability and validity of orthopaedic tests for the diagnosis of ankle sprains and instability.Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to December 2021. In addition, the reference list of included studies, located systematic reviews, and orthopaedic textbooks were searched. All articles reporting reliability or validity of physical examination or orthopaedic tests to diagnose ankle instability or sprains were included. Methodological quality of the reliability and the validity studies was assessed with The Quality Appraisal for Reliability studies checklist and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 respectively. We identified the number of times the orthopaedic test was investigated and the validity and/or reliability of each test.Results: Overall, sixteen studies were included. Three studies assessed reliability, eight assessed validity, and five eval-uated both. Overall, fifteen tests were evaluated, none demonstrated robust reliability and validity scores. The antero-lateral talar palpation test reported the highest diagnostic accuracy. Further, the anterior drawer test, the anterolateral talar palpation, the reverse anterior lateral drawer test, and palpation of the anterior talofibular ligament reported the highest sensitivity. The highest specificity was attributed to the anterior drawer test, the anterolateral drawer test, the reverse anterior lateral drawer test, tenderness on palpation of the proximal fibular, and the squeeze test.Conclusion: Overall, the diagnostic accuracy, reliability, and validity of physical examination tests for the assessment of ankle instability were limited. Physical examination tests should not be used in isolation, but rather in combination with the clinical history to diagnose an ankle sprain. Preliminary evidence suggests that the overall validity of physical examination for the ankle may be better if conducted five days after the injury rather than within 48 h of injury.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability and validity of physical examination tests for the assessment of ankle instability
    Amber Beynon
    Sylvie Le May
    Jean Theroux
    [J]. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 30
  • [2] Reliability and validity of current physical examination techniques of the foot and ankle
    Wrobel, James S.
    Armstrong, David G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 98 (03) : 197 - 206
  • [3] Physical Examination of the Ankle: A Review of the Original Orthopedic Special Test Description and Scientific Validity of Common Tests for Ankle Examination
    Larkins, Lindsay W.
    Baker, Russell T.
    Baker, Jayme G.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND CLINICAL TRANSLATION, 2020, 2 (03)
  • [4] Reliability and validity of physical examination tests used to examine the upper extremity - Reply
    Marx, RG
    Bombardier, C
    Wright, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 24A (04): : 868 - 869
  • [5] RELIABILITY OF PHYSICAL TESTS IN EXAMINATION OF WRIST
    PASILA, M
    KARAHARJU, EO
    LEPISTO, PV
    [J]. ANNALES CHIRURGIAE ET GYNAECOLOGIAE, 1973, 62 (06) : 334 - 338
  • [6] The reliability and validity of a digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool
    Rosen, Adam B.
    Johnston, Madison
    Chung, Sunghoon
    Burcal, Christopher J.
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 43 (12) : 1738 - 1741
  • [7] The cumberland ankle instability tool: A report of validity and reliability testing
    Hiller, Claire E.
    Refshauge, Kathryn M.
    Bundy, Anita C.
    Herbert, Rob D.
    Kilbreath, Sharon L.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2006, 87 (09): : 1235 - 1241
  • [8] Validity and reliability of clinical tests for assessing passive ankle stiffness
    Araujo, Vanessa L.
    Carvalhais, Viviane O. C.
    Souza, Thales R.
    Ocarino, Juliana M.
    Goncalves, Gabriela G. P.
    Fonseca, Sergio T.
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2011, 15 (02) : 166 - 173
  • [9] Reliability and Validity of Korean Version Ankle Instability Instrument and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure
    Kim, Jin Ah
    Ha, Sangmin
    Kang, Taekyu
    Lee, Sae Yong
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2016, 48 (05): : 783 - 783
  • [10] Reliability and discriminative validity of sudden ankle inversion measurements in patients with chronic ankle instability
    Eechaute, Christophe
    Vaes, Peter
    Duquet, William
    Van Gheluwe, Bart
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2009, 30 (01) : 82 - 86