Radiation risk of breast screening in England with digital mammography

被引:27
|
作者
Warren, Lucy M. [1 ]
Dance, David R. [1 ,2 ]
Young, Kenneth C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Natl Coordinating Ctr Phys Mammog, Guildford, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Surrey, Dept Phys, Guildford, Surrey, England
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2016年 / 89卷 / 1067期
关键词
CANCER MORTALITY; UK; OVERDIAGNOSIS; BENEFITS; PROGRAM; EUROPE; IMPACT; TRIAL; WOMEN; AGE;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20150897
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate the risks and benefits of breast screening in terms of number of deaths due to radiation-induced cancers and the number of lives saved owing to modern screening in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) in England. Methods: Radiation risk model, patient dose data and data from national screening statistics were used to estimate the number of deaths due to radiation-induced breast cancers in the NHSBSP in England. Dose and dose effectiveness factors (DDREFs) equal to one and two were assumed. The breast cancer mortality reduction in the invited population due to screening and the percentage of females diagnosed with symptomatic breast cancer, who die from breast cancer, were collated from the literature. The number of lives saved owing to screening was calculated. Results: Assuming, a total of 1,770,436 females between the ages of 50-70 years were screened each year, and a breast cancer mortality reduction of 20% due to screening in the invited population, the number of screen-detected cancers were 14,872 annually, resulting in 1071 lives saved. Conversely, for the same mortality reduction, the number of radiation-induced cancers was 36 and 18 for DDREFs of 1 and 2, respectively. This resulted in seven and three deaths due to radiation-induced cancers annually for DDREFs of 1 and 2, respectively. The ratios of lives saved owing to screening to radiation-induced cancerswere 30: 1 and 60: 1 for DDREFs of 1 and 2. The ratios of lives saved owing to screening to deaths due to radiation-induced cancers were 156: 1 and 312 : 1 for DDREFs of 1 and 2. For the 1.8% of the screening population with very thick breasts, the latter ratios decrease to 94: 1 and 187 : 1 for DDREFs of 1 and 2. Conclusion: The breast cancer mortality reduction due to screening greatly outweighs the risk of death due to radiation-induced cancers. Advances in knowledge: Estimation of the radiation risk for modern breast screening in England using digital mammography.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk
    Yi, Ann
    Jang, Myoung-jin
    Yim, Dahae
    Kwon, Bo Ra
    Shin, Sung Ui
    Chang, Jung Min
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2021, 298 (03) : 568 - 575
  • [2] Estimated risk of radiation-induced cancer following breast screening employing tomosynthesis and digital mammography
    Alves, Marcos S.
    Ferro, Ana G. L.
    Moreira, Marcia C. L.
    Santos, William S.
    Neves, Lucio P.
    Perini, Ana P.
    Belinato, Walmir
    Souza, Divanizia N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2021, 41 (02) : 254 - 265
  • [3] Radiation dose from digital breast tomosynthesis screening - A comparison with full field digital mammography
    Ali, Raed M. K. M.
    England, Andrew
    Tootell, Andrew K.
    Hogg, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2020, 51 (04) : 599 - 603
  • [4] BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS OR DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY FOR BREAST CANCER SCREENING?
    Svahn, Tony
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS IN THE BALTIC STATES, 2011, : 53 - 56
  • [5] Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography
    Lai, Yi-Chen
    Ray, Kimberly M.
    Lee, Amie Y.
    Hayward, Jessica H.
    Freimanis, Rita I.
    Lobach, Iryna V.
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 630 - 638
  • [6] Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Controversies
    Funaro, Kimberly
    Drukteinis, Jennifer
    Falcon, Shannon
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 110 (10) : 607 - 613
  • [7] Breast Cancer Screening With Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography
    Seidenwurm, David
    Rosenberg, Robert
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 312 (16): : 1695 - 1695
  • [8] Digital mammography: Are there advantages in screening for breast cancer?
    Nees, Alexis V.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (04) : 401 - 407
  • [9] Association of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Risk of Interval Invasive and Advanced Breast Cancer
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Su, Yu-Ru
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Onega, Tracy
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Alsheik, Nila
    Bissell, Michael C. S.
    O'Meara, Ellen S.
    Lee, Christoph, I
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2022, 327 (22): : 2220 - 2230
  • [10] MRI, ultrasound, and digital mammography for breast cancer screening in women at high risk
    Sumkin, JH
    Ganott, MA
    Hakim, CM
    Hardesty, LA
    Poller, WR
    Rubenstein, WS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (04) : 36 - 36