"Bring Your Own Device" (BYOD): The Future of Field-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Clinical Trials?

被引:18
|
作者
Gwaltney, Chad [1 ]
Coons, Stephen Joel [2 ]
O'Donohoe, Paul [3 ]
O'Gorman, Hannah [4 ]
Denomey, Matthew [5 ]
Howry, Cindy [6 ]
Ross, Jennifer [7 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, ERT, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Crit Path Inst, PRO Consortium, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] CRF Hlth, London, England
[4] Exco InTouch, Nottingham, England
[5] ICON, Wurzburg, Germany
[6] YPrime, Austin, TX USA
[7] Almac Clin Technol, Souderton, PA USA
关键词
clinical outcome assessments; patient-reported outcomes; electronic data capture; smartphone apps; diaries; study endpoints; PRO INSTRUMENTS;
D O I
10.1177/2168479015609104
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Field-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments, including measures of signs, symptoms, and events that are administered outside of the research clinic, can be critical in evaluating the efficacy and safety of new medical treatments. Collection of this type of data commonly involves providing subjects with stand-alone electronic devices, such as smartphones, that they can use to respond to assessments in their home or work environment. Although this approach has proven useful, it is also limited in several ways: For example, provisioning stand-alone devices can be costly for sponsors, and requiring subjects to carry a device that is exclusively dedicated to the study can be burdensome. The Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) approach, in which subjects use their own smartphone or Internet-enabled device to complete field-based PRO assessments, addresses many of these concerns. However, the BYOD model has its own limitations that should be considered. In this article, representatives of the ePRO Consortium review operational, privacy/security, and scientific/regulatory considerations regarding BYOD. We hope that this review will allow researchers to make informed decisions when choosing methods to collect field-based PRO data in future clinical trials. Additionally, we hope that the discussion in this article will establish a research agenda for further examination of BYOD approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 791
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARABILITY OF A PROVISIONED DEVICE VERSUS BRING YOUR OWN DEVICE FOR COMPLETION OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME (PRO) MEASURES BY PARTICIPANTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (COPD): QUANTITATIVE STUDY FINDINGS
    Hudgens, S.
    Newton, L.
    Eremenco, S.
    Crescioni, M.
    Symonds, T.
    Griffiths, P.
    Knight-West, O.
    Reasner, D.
    Byrom, B.
    O'Donohoe, P.
    Vallow, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S418 - S418
  • [32] PATIENT-REPORTED REAL-WORLD TREATMENT PATTERNS FOR MELANOMA IN THE UK MEASURED USING A DIGITAL 'BRING YOUR OWN DEVICE' PLATFORM
    Larkin, J.
    Cannon, D.
    Nuttall, G.
    Au, L.
    Hunter, N.
    Spain, L.
    Turajlic, S.
    Akesson, C.
    Llewellyn, S.
    Nixon, A.
    Kousoulakou, H.
    Larkin, M.
    Wiseman, T.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S94 - S95
  • [33] Best Practices for Avoiding Paper Backup When Implementing Electronic Approaches to Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Clinical Trials
    Howry, Cindy
    Elash, Celeste A.
    Crescioni, Mabel
    Eremenco, Sonya
    O'Donohoe, Paul
    Rothrock, Tracey
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2019, 53 (04) : 441 - 445
  • [34] Best Practices for Avoiding Paper Backup When Implementing Electronic Approaches to Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Clinical Trials
    Cindy Howry
    Celeste A. Elash
    Mabel Crescioni
    Sonya Eremenco
    Paul O’Donohoe
    Tracey Rothrock
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2019, 53 : 441 - 445
  • [35] Enabling patient-reported outcome measures in clinical trials, exemplified by cardiovascular trials
    Theresa M. Coles
    Adrian F. Hernandez
    Bryce B. Reeve
    Karon Cook
    Michael C. Edwards
    Marc Boutin
    Elizabeth Bush
    Arnold Degboe
    Lothar Roessig
    Amy Rudolph
    Pauline McNulty
    Nikunj Patel
    Trish Kay-Mugford
    Margaret Vernon
    Michael Woloschak
    Gustavo Buchele
    John A. Spertus
    Matthew T. Roe
    Denise Bury
    Kevin Weinfurt
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19
  • [36] Enabling patient-reported outcome measures in clinical trials, exemplified by cardiovascular trials
    Coles, Theresa M.
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Cook, Karon
    Edwards, Michael C.
    Boutin, Marc
    Bush, Elizabeth
    Degboe, Arnold
    Roessig, Lothar
    Rudolph, Amy
    McNulty, Pauline
    Patel, Nikunj
    Kay-Mugford, Trish
    Vernon, Margaret
    Woloschak, Michael
    Buchele, Gustavo
    Spertus, John A.
    Roe, Matthew T.
    Bury, Denise
    Weinfurt, Kevin
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [37] Optimizing Electronic Capture of Clinical Outcome Assessment Data in Clinical Trials: The Case of Patient-Reported Endpoints
    Fleming, Sarah
    Barsdorf, Alexandra I.
    Howry, Cindy
    O'Gorman, Hannah
    Coons, Stephen Joel
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2015, 49 (06) : 797 - 804
  • [38] Optimizing Electronic Capture of Clinical Outcome Assessment Data in Clinical Trials: The Case of Patient-Reported Endpoints
    Sarah Fleming
    Alexandra I. Barsdorf
    Cindy Howry
    Hannah O’Gorman
    Stephen Joel Coons
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2015, 49 : 797 - 804
  • [39] Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Collection Systems in Orthopaedic Clinical Practice
    Lizzio, Vincent A.
    Dekhne, Mihir S.
    Makhni, Eric C.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2019, 7 (07)
  • [40] The impact of patient-reported outcome data from clinical trials: perspectives from international stakeholders
    Rivera, Samantha Cruz
    McMullan, Christel
    Jones, Laura
    Kyte, Derek
    Slade, Anita
    Calvert, Melanie
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)