Characterizing comprehensiveness of urban forest management plans in Washington State

被引:15
|
作者
Gibbons, Katherine H. [1 ]
Ryan, Clare M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Framework; Plan evaluation; Urban forest planning; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.003
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Urban forest management plans serve as a municipality's guiding document for management of its urban trees and urban forest. This paper presents results of a content analysis and evaluation of the comprehensiveness of 39 urban forest management plans in Washington State. Comprehensiveness is the degree to which a plan includes a review of the current state of the resource, a vision for the future state, goals and objectives, an action plan for implementation, and a plan for monitoring progress. We also explored whether municipality size, community involvement, plan author, or funding source influence plan comprehensiveness. Plan comprehensiveness varies, and although most plans included the results of a tree inventory, very few conducted a full assessment of the current state of the urban forest. Tree maintenance, tree establishment, and tree protection were addressed most frequently, and many of the plans included a vision statement. The majority of plans included detailed action steps for implementing goals related to tree maintenance and tree establishment, and about a quarter of the plans included an implementation plan. Very few plans addressed monitoring and adaptive management, and no plan included a detailed strategy for monitoring the implementation of the plan. Larger municipalities tend to have more comprehensive plans, and community involvement in the plan development process appears to positively influence the overall comprehensiveness score. No relationship was found between plan author or receipt of grant funding and plan comprehensiveness. Our approach for evaluating plan comprehensiveness suggests a useful framework for future plan development, revision, and evaluation. (C) 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:615 / 624
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Restoration of burned areas in forest management plans
    Alloza, JA
    Vallejo, R
    DESERTIFICATION IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION. A SECURITY ISSUE, 2006, 3 : 475 - +
  • [22] Family Forest Management Plans: An Obsolete Paradigm
    VanBrakle, Joshua D.
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2015, 113 (01) : 75 - 76
  • [23] Sustainable Forest Management in Cameroon Needs More than Approved Forest Management Plans
    Cerutti, Paolo Omar
    Nasi, Robert
    Tacconi, Luca
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2008, 13 (02):
  • [24] Characterizing Non-governmental Organizations And Local Government Collaborations In Urban Forest Management Across Canada
    Doucet, Tyler C.
    Duinker, Peter N.
    Charles, John D.
    Steenberg, James W. N.
    Zurba, Melanie
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 73 (01) : 231 - 242
  • [25] Characterizing Non-governmental Organizations And Local Government Collaborations In Urban Forest Management Across Canada
    Tyler C. Doucet
    Peter N. Duinker
    John D. Charles
    James W. N. Steenberg
    Melanie Zurba
    Environmental Management, 2024, 73 : 231 - 242
  • [26] Management and Administration of Urban Forest
    ZHANG JianguoFujian Agriculture and Forestry University
    Chinese Forestry Science and Technology, 2005, (03) : 85 - 89
  • [27] COMPUTERIZED URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT
    HOWARD, C
    HUDSON, B
    PUBLIC WORKS, 1984, 115 (07): : 54 - 56
  • [28] Urban forest management tools
    de Aguiar Moraes Amaral, Raquel Dias
    Morato, Rubia Gomes
    Mariano, Richard Soares
    Rodrigues Ferreira, Janio Marcos
    REVISTA DE GESTAO AMBIENTAL E SUSTENTABILIDADE-GEAS, 2021, 10 (01):
  • [29] Unstable slope management: Washington state
    Lowell, Steve
    Morin, Pat
    2000, National Research Council
  • [30] An urban forest-inventory-and-analysis investigation in Oregon and Washington
    Strunk, Jacob L.
    Mills, John R.
    Ries, Paul
    Temesgen, Hailemariam
    Jeroue, Lacey
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2016, 18 : 100 - 109