Identifying Training Deficiencies in Military Pilots by Applying the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System

被引:20
|
作者
Li, Wen-Chin [1 ]
Harris, Don [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Def Univ, Dept Psychol, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] HFI Solut, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
accident investigation; error analysis; human error; human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS); training development; AVIATION ACCIDENTS; ERROR;
D O I
10.1080/10803548.2013.11076962
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Without accurate analysis, it is difficult to identify training needs and develop the content of training programs required for preventing aviation accidents. The human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) is based on Reason's system-wide model of human error. In this study, 523 accidents from the Republic of China Air Force were analyzed in which 1762 human errors were categorized. The results of the analysis showed that errors of judgment and poor decision-making were commonly reported amongst pilots. As a result, it was concluded that there was a need for military pilots to be trained specifically in making decisions in tactical environments. However, application of HFACS also allowed the identification of systemic training deficiencies within the organization further contributing to the accidents observed.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:3 / 18
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Three-dimensional virtual human in the military criminal investigation training system
    Liu, Yating
    Yin, Hong
    Zhang, Rui
    Huang, Wei
    Zhao, Zhennan
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING 2011, 2011, 24 : 585 - 592
  • [42] Noninvasive measurements to evaluate the effects of military training on the human autonomic nervous system
    Chen, Ji-Hong
    Zhang, Qian
    Liu, Xin
    Li, Zhixin
    Zhang, Cuizhen
    Li, Kongling
    Paul, Jonathan
    Ouyang, Jingming
    Yu, Yuanjie
    Yu, Baoping
    Huizinga, Jan D.
    Chen, Jiande D. Z.
    Luo, Hesheng
    ASIAN BIOMEDICINE, 2014, 8 (04) : 453 - 461
  • [43] Systematic human factors evaluation of a teledermatology system within the US military
    Stronge, Aideen J.
    Nichols, Timothy
    Rogers, Wendy A.
    Fisk, Arthur D.
    TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2008, 14 (01): : 25 - 34
  • [44] An investigation of air accidents in Nigeria using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) framework
    Daramola, Adebukola Yewande
    JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2014, 35 : 39 - 50
  • [45] Assessment of collisions and grounding accidents with human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) and statistical methods
    Yildirim, Umut
    Basar, Ersan
    Ugurlu, Ozkan
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 119 : 412 - 425
  • [46] Application of Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) to UK rail safety of the line incidents
    Madigan, Ruth
    Golightly, David
    Madders, Richard
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2016, 97 : 122 - 131
  • [47] Applying human factors methods to the investigation and analysis of clinical adverse events
    Taylor-Adams, S
    Vincent, C
    Stanhope, N
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 1999, 31 (02) : 143 - 159
  • [48] Incorporating Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) Into Analysis of Reported Near Misses and Incidents in Radiation Oncology
    Judy, Gregory D.
    Lindsay, Daniel P.
    Gu, Deen
    Mullins, Brandon T.
    Mosaly, Prithima R.
    Marks, Lawrence B.
    Chera, Bhishamjit S.
    Mazur, Lukasz M.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10 (05) : E312 - E321
  • [49] Assessing the Applicability and Reliability of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) to the Analysis of Good Catches in Radiation Oncology
    Mosaly, P. R.
    Mazur, L.
    Miller, S. M.
    Eblan, M. J.
    Falchook, A.
    Goldin, G. H.
    Marks, L. B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S750 - S751
  • [50] Applying human reliability growth analysis to system performance enhancement
    Yang, Chih-Wei
    Lin, Chiuhsiang Joe
    Chen, James C.
    HUMAN SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2006, 25 (01) : 77 - 86