Understanding patient engagement in health system decision-making: a co-designed scoping review

被引:35
|
作者
McCarron, Tamara L. [1 ,2 ]
Moffat, Karen [3 ]
Wilkinson, Gloria [3 ]
Zelinsky, Sandra [3 ]
Boyd, Jamie M. [1 ,2 ]
White, Deborah [4 ]
Hassay, Derek [5 ]
Lorenzetti, Diane L. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Marlett, Nancy J. [1 ,2 ]
Noseworthy, Thomas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dept Community Hlth Sci, Teaching Res & Wellness Bldg,3280 Hosp Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
[2] OBrien Inst Publ Hlth, Teaching Res & Wellness Bldg,3280 Hosp Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary Qatar, Fac Nursing, POB 23133, Doha, Al Rayayan Al F, Qatar
[5] Haskayne Sch Business, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[6] Univ Calgary, Hlth Sci Lib, 3330 Hosp Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N, Canada
关键词
Patients; Capacity building; Patient participation; Patient-centered; Decision-making; IMPACT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-019-0994-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: With healthcare striving to shift to a more person-centered delivery model, patient and family involvement must have a bigger role in shaping this. While many initiatives involving patients and family members focus on self-care, a broader understanding of patient participation is necessary. Ensuring a viable and sustainable critical number of qualified patients and family members to support this shift will be of utmost importance. The purpose of this study was to understand how health systems are intentionally investing in the training and skill development of patients and family members. Methods: Patient co-investigators and researchers conducted a scoping review of the existing literature on methods adopted by healthcare systems to build the skills and capacity of patients to participate in healthcare decision-making using a recognized methodological framework. Six electronic databases were searched to identify studies. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and full-text papers for inclusion. The research team independently extracted data. Any disagreements were resolved by achieving consensus through discussion. Quantitative and qualitative content synthesis, as well as a quality assessment, was conducted. Results: After eliminating duplicates, the search resulted in 9428 abstracts. Four hundred fifty-eight articles were reviewed and 15 articles were included. Four themes emerged: forums (33%), patient instructors (20%), workshops (33%), and co-design (13%). Four of the identified studies measured the impact and overall effectiveness of the respective programs. Examples of how patient and family members were supported (invested in) included advocacy training to support future involvement in engagement activities, a training program to conduct patient-led research, involvement in an immersive experience-based co-design initiative, and involvement in training pharmacy students. Overall, these studies found positive outcomes when patients and family members were recipients of these opportunities. Conclusions: The results of this scoping review demonstrate that an evidence base around programs to advance patient engagement is largely absent. An opportunity exists for further research to identify strategies and measures to support patient engagement in healthcare decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient perspectives on engagement in shared decision-making for asthma care
    Tapp, Hazel
    Derkowski, Diane
    Calvert, Melissa
    Welch, Madelyn
    Spencer, Sara
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 34 (03) : 353 - 357
  • [42] In the works: Patient and public involvement and engagement in healthcare decision-making
    de Graaff, Bert
    Kleinhout-Vliek, Tineke
    Van de Bovenkamp, Hester
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (06) : 1903 - 1904
  • [43] The Superiority of Patient Engagement and Shared Decision-Making in Noninferiority Trials
    Richard M. Hoffman
    Mary McNaughton-Collins
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2014, 29 : 16 - 17
  • [44] Co-designed healthcare transition interventions for adolescents and young adults with chronic conditions: a scoping review
    Bray, Emily Alice
    Everett, Bronwyn
    George, Ajesh
    Salamonson, Yenna
    Ramjan, Lucie M.
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 44 (24) : 7610 - 7631
  • [45] Shared decision-making in persons living with dementia: A scoping review
    Mattos, Meghan K.
    Gibson, Jessie S.
    Wilson, Dan
    Jepson, Laura
    Ahn, Soojung
    Williams, Ishan C.
    [J]. DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 22 (04): : 875 - 909
  • [46] Collective intelligence in medical decision-making: a systematic scoping review
    Kate Radcliffe
    Helena C. Lyson
    Jill Barr-Walker
    Urmimala Sarkar
    [J]. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19
  • [47] Shared decision-making in advanced kidney disease: a scoping review
    Engels, Noel
    de Graav, Gretchen N.
    van der Nat, Paul
    van den Dorpel, Marinus
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Bos, Willem Jan
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [48] Comorbid Dementia and Cancer Therapy Decision-Making: A Scoping Review
    Halpin, Sean N.
    Alain, Gabriel
    Seaman, Aaron
    Stevens, Erin E.
    Zhao, Hui
    Fowler, Mackenzie E.
    Zhang, Qiuyang
    Cadet, Tamara
    Ye, Minzhi
    Krok-Schoen, Jessica L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GERONTOLOGY, 2024, 43 (08) : 1132 - 1143
  • [49] The Impact of Shared Decision-Making in Perinatal Care: A Scoping Review
    Megregian, Michele
    Emeis, Cathy
    Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 65 (06) : 777 - 788
  • [50] Emotion regulation and decision-making in persons with dementia: A scoping review
    Perach, Rotem
    Rusted, Jennifer
    Harris, Peter R.
    Miles, Eleanor
    [J]. DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 20 (05): : 1832 - 1854