Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards

被引:346
|
作者
Eiser, J. Richard [1 ]
Bostrom, Ann [2 ]
Burton, Ian [3 ]
Johnston, David M. [4 ]
McClure, John [5 ]
Paton, Douglas [6 ]
van der Pligt, Joop [7 ]
White, Mathew P. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Western Bank, Psychol, Sheffield S10 2TP, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Washington, Daniel J Evans Sch Publ Affairs, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Geog, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Massey Univ, GNS Sci, Lower Hutt 5010, New Zealand
[5] Victoria Univ Wellington, Psychol, Wellington, New Zealand
[6] Univ Tasmania, Psychol, Launceston, Tas, Australia
[7] Univ Amsterdam, Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Exeter, Knowledge Spa, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Sch Med, Truro TR1 3HD, England
关键词
Risk; Hazard; Interpretation; Decision; Trust;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.05.002
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Understanding how people interpret risks and choose actions based on their interpretations is vital to any strategy for disaster reduction. We review relevant literature with the aim of developing a conceptual framework to guide future research in this area. We stress that risks in the context of natural hazards always involve interactions between natural (physical) and human (behavioural) factors. Decision-making under conditions of uncertainty is inadequately described by traditional models of 'rational choice'. Instead, attention needs to be paid to how people's interpretations of risks are shaped by their own experience, personal feelings and values, cultural beliefs and interpersonal and societal dynamics. Furthermore, access to information and capacity for self-protection are typically distributed unevenly within populations. Hence trust is a critical moderator of the effectiveness of any policy for risk communication and public engagement. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 16
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AN INTERPRETATION ABOUT THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF THE CORPORATE COMMUNICATION
    Tuncel, Hakan
    [J]. MARMARA JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2011, (18): : 252 - 267
  • [22] Household responses to climate-related hazards in four Latin American cities: A conceptual framework and exploratory analysis
    Qin, Hua
    Romero-Lankao, Patricia
    Hardoy, Jorgelina
    Rosas-Huerta, Angelica
    [J]. URBAN CLIMATE, 2015, 14 : 94 - 110
  • [23] Extreme events: a framework for assessing natural hazards
    Franck Mazas
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2019, 98 : 823 - 848
  • [24] Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: a macro framework
    Joseph, Jacquleen
    [J]. DISASTERS, 2013, 37 (02) : 185 - 200
  • [25] Extreme events: a framework for assessing natural hazards
    Mazas, Franck
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2019, 98 (03) : 823 - 848
  • [26] How conceptual problems migrate: Rational choice, interpretation, and the hazards of pluralism
    Johnson, J
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 5 : 223 - 248
  • [27] Vulnerability and resilience in the context of natural hazards: a critical conceptual analysis
    Lanlan, Jiang
    Sarker, Md Nazirul Islam
    Ali, Isahaque
    Firdaus, R. B. Radin
    Hossin, Md Altab
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (08) : 19069 - 19092
  • [28] The production of unequal vulnerability to flood hazards: A conceptual framework for hazards research in Canada's cities
    Oulahen, Greg
    [J]. CANADIAN GEOGRAPHER-GEOGRAPHE CANADIEN, 2016, 60 (01): : 82 - 90
  • [29] Risk Perceptions, Optimism, and Natural Hazards
    Smith, V. Kerry
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2008, 28 (06) : 1763 - 1767
  • [30] Evaluating a conceptual framework for quality assessment of medical interpretation
    Hamai, Taeko
    Nagata, Ayako
    Ono, Naoko
    Nishikawa, Hiroaki
    Higashino, Sadanori
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2024, 123