Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards

被引:346
|
作者
Eiser, J. Richard [1 ]
Bostrom, Ann [2 ]
Burton, Ian [3 ]
Johnston, David M. [4 ]
McClure, John [5 ]
Paton, Douglas [6 ]
van der Pligt, Joop [7 ]
White, Mathew P. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Western Bank, Psychol, Sheffield S10 2TP, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Washington, Daniel J Evans Sch Publ Affairs, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Geog, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Massey Univ, GNS Sci, Lower Hutt 5010, New Zealand
[5] Victoria Univ Wellington, Psychol, Wellington, New Zealand
[6] Univ Tasmania, Psychol, Launceston, Tas, Australia
[7] Univ Amsterdam, Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Exeter, Knowledge Spa, European Ctr Environm & Human Hlth, Sch Med, Truro TR1 3HD, England
关键词
Risk; Hazard; Interpretation; Decision; Trust;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2012.05.002
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Understanding how people interpret risks and choose actions based on their interpretations is vital to any strategy for disaster reduction. We review relevant literature with the aim of developing a conceptual framework to guide future research in this area. We stress that risks in the context of natural hazards always involve interactions between natural (physical) and human (behavioural) factors. Decision-making under conditions of uncertainty is inadequately described by traditional models of 'rational choice'. Instead, attention needs to be paid to how people's interpretations of risks are shaped by their own experience, personal feelings and values, cultural beliefs and interpersonal and societal dynamics. Furthermore, access to information and capacity for self-protection are typically distributed unevenly within populations. Hence trust is a critical moderator of the effectiveness of any policy for risk communication and public engagement. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 16
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modelling public risk evaluation of natural hazards: a conceptual approach
    Plattner, T
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2005, 5 (03) : 357 - 366
  • [2] Risk tolerance as a complementary concept to risk perception of natural hazards: A conceptual review and application
    Anderson, Carl C.
    Moure, Mar
    Demski, Christina
    Renaud, Fabrice G.
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2024, 44 (02) : 304 - 321
  • [3] RESPONSES TO COMMERCIALS IN LABORATORY VERSUS NATURAL SETTINGS - A CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK
    GARDNER, MP
    RAJ, SP
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1983, 10 : 142 - 146
  • [4] Farmworker Vulnerability to Heat Hazards: A Conceptual Framework
    Mac, Valerie Vi Thien
    McCauley, Linda A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2017, 49 (06) : 617 - 624
  • [5] The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework
    Pacherie, Elisabeth
    [J]. COGNITION, 2008, 107 (01) : 179 - 217
  • [6] A conceptual framework and interpretation of emergy algebra
    Tiruta-Barna, Ligia
    Benetto, Enrico
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 53 : 290 - 298
  • [7] Digital heritage interpretation: a conceptual framework
    Rahaman, Hafizur
    [J]. DIGITAL CREATIVITY, 2018, 29 (2-3) : 208 - 234
  • [8] Linking risk communication and sustainable climate change action: A conceptual framework
    Volenzo, Tom E.
    Odiyo, John O.
    [J]. JAMBA-JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK STUDIES, 2019, 11
  • [9] Building resilience to natural hazards in Indonesia: progress and challenges in implementing the Hyogo Framework for Action
    Riyanti Djalante
    Frank Thomalla
    Muhammad Sabaruddin Sinapoy
    Michelle Carnegie
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2012, 62 : 779 - 803
  • [10] Building resilience to natural hazards in Indonesia: progress and challenges in implementing the Hyogo Framework for Action
    Djalante, Riyanti
    Thomalla, Frank
    Sinapoy, Muhammad Sabaruddin
    Carnegie, Michelle
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 62 (03) : 779 - 803