THE IMPACT OF TWO DIFFERENT THAW PROTOCOLS ON OUTCOMES OF VITRIFIED CLEAVAGE-STAGE EMBRYOS TRANSFER

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Xiao-jian [1 ]
Yang, Ye-Zhou
Lv, Qun
Wang, Yu
Cao, Xue-hua
Li, Xiao-jie
Liao, Mei-xu
Guo, Chun
机构
[1] Sichuan Acad Med Sci, Dept Assisted Reprod Med Ctr, Chengdu 610072, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Cleavage-stage embryos; Vitrified; Thawed method; Outcomes; CRYOPRESERVATION; VITRIFICATION; SURVIVAL; SUCCESS; CYCLES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate the gestational results obtained with vitrified-thawed human cleavage-stage embryo by two different thaw protocols. Embryo development was observed to cleavage-stage and embryos were cryopreserved by vitrification on day 3 after oocyte retrieval. 51 cycles were thawed using vitrification warming kit with decreasing concentrations of sucrose in 3 dilutions (1.0, 0.5 and 0 mol/L respectively) as group 1, 56 cycles were thawed with decreasing concentrations of sucrose in 5 dilutions (0.8, 0.6, 0.33, 0.2 and 0 mol/L respectively) as group 2. Embryo survival (>50% intact blastomeres), complete embryo survival (100% intact blastomeres), pregnancy and implantation rates were compared, and development rates the day after thawing were also compared. Multivariate analysis showed a significant difference in embryo immediate morphological survival rate, complete survival and clinical pregnancies rate between the two groups respectively (87.0 vs. 98.6%, p=0.000; 71.0 vs. 82.0%, p=0.043; 27.5 vs. 46.4%, P=0.048) whereas the embryo subsequent development rates, mean number of transferred embryos was similar between the two groups. (61.4 vs. 61.3%, p=0.502; 2.2 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.6, p=0.113). In addition, no differences in implantation rate were observed between two groups (17.7 vs. 25.6%, P=0.138). No difference in the multiple pregnancy rates was found among the two groups also.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 417
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Chromosome hydroxymethylation patterns in human zygotes and cleavage-stage embryos
    Efimova, Olga A.
    Pendina, Anna A.
    Tikhonov, Andrei V.
    Fedorova, Irina D.
    Krapivin, Mikhail I.
    Chiryaeva, Olga G.
    Shilnikova, Evgeniia M.
    Bogdanova, Mariia A.
    Kogan, Igor Yu
    Kuznetzova, Tatyana V.
    Gzgzyan, Alexander M.
    Ailamazyan, Edward K.
    Baranov, Vladislav S.
    [J]. REPRODUCTION, 2015, 149 (03) : 223 - 233
  • [22] Comparison of the pregnancy and obstetric outcomes between single cleavage-stage embryo transfer and single blastocyst transfer by time-lapse selection of embryos
    Wang, Shanshan
    Chen, Lei
    Fang, Junshun
    Jiang, Weihua
    Zhang, Ningyuan
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 35 (09) : 792 - 795
  • [23] Effect of vitrification on clinical outcomes of cleavage-stage embryos with poor quality in human embryo cryopreservation
    Liu Tao
    Lian Ying
    Liu Ping
    Li Rong
    Yan Jie
    Qiao Jie
    [J]. 生殖与发育医学(英文), 2022, (01) : 20 - 25
  • [24] VITRIFICATION OF CLEAVAGE-STAGE MOUSE EMBRYOS BY THE VITROLOOP™ (CRYOLOOP) PROCEDURE
    Klambauer, P.
    Kanyo, K.
    Keresztes, Zs.
    Varga, E.
    Kriston, R.
    Konc, J.
    Cseh, S.
    Solti, L.
    [J]. REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 21 (01) : 134 - 134
  • [25] Gene expression profiles in Ciona intestinalis cleavage-stage embryos
    Fujiwara, S
    Maeda, Y
    Shin-I, T
    Kohara, Y
    Takatori, N
    Satou, Y
    Satoh, N
    [J]. MECHANISMS OF DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 112 (1-2) : 115 - 127
  • [26] Live Imaging of the Cytoskeleton in Early Cleavage-Stage Zebrafish Embryos
    Wuehr, M.
    Obholzer, N. D.
    Megason, S. G.
    Detrich, H. W., III
    Mitchison, T. J.
    [J]. ZEBRAFISH: CELLULAR AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, PT B, THIRD EDITION, 2011, 101 : 1 - 18
  • [27] The relationship of morphokinetic events and euploidy in human cleavage-stage embryos
    Bayram, A.
    Findikli, N.
    Serdarogullari, M.
    Sahin, O.
    Ulug, U.
    Tosun, S. B.
    Bahceci, M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 : 200 - 201
  • [28] Blastocyst-stage transfer of poor-quality cleavage-stage embryos results in higher implantation rates
    Balaban, B
    Urman, B
    Alatas, C
    Mercan, R
    Aksoy, S
    Isiklar, A
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 75 (03) : 514 - 518
  • [29] Elective single cleavage-stage embryo transfer need not result in lower pregnancy rates compared to double cleavage-stage embryo transfer
    Nakagawa, Koji
    Nishi, Yayoi
    Sugiyama, Rie
    Kuribayashi, Yasushi
    Sugiyama, Rikikazu
    Inoue, Masato
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2010, 36 (04) : 777 - 782
  • [30] Relationship Between Endometrial Thickness and Pregnancy Outcome in Normal Responder Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization and with Transfer of Two Cleavage-Stage Embryos
    Chen, Ya
    Zhou, Chun
    Ma, Ling
    Wang, Su-qing
    Hong, Zhi-dan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 62 (9-10) : 559 - 564