The Use of Lexical and Referential Cues in Children's Online Interpretation of Adjectives

被引:18
|
作者
Huang, Yi Ting [1 ]
Snedeker, Jesse [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Hearing & Speech Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Psychol, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
language processing; referential contrast; comprehension; scalar adjectives; ACQUISITION; CONSTRAINTS; SIZE; TIME; INFORMATION; CONTEXT; ADULTS; SHE;
D O I
10.1037/a0029477
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Recent research on moment-to-moment language comprehension has revealed striking differences between adults and preschool children. Adults rapidly use the referential principle to resolve syntactic ambiguity, assuming that modification is more likely when there are 2 possible referents for a definite noun phrase. Young children do not. We examine the scope of this phenomenon by exploring whether children use the referential principle to resolve another form of ambiguity. Scalar adjectives (big, small) are typically used to refer to an object when contrasting members of the same category are present in the scene (big and small coins). In the present experiment, 5-year-olds and adults heard instructions like "Point to the big (small) coin" while their eye-movements were measured to displays containing 1 or 2 coins. Both groups rapidly recruited the meaning of the adjective to distinguish between referents of different sizes. Critically, like adults, children were quicker to look to the correct item in trials containing 2 possible referents compared with 1. Nevertheless, children's sensitivity to the referential principle was substantially delayed compared to adults', suggesting possible differences in the recruitment of this top-down cue. The implications of current and previous findings are discussed with respect to the development of the architecture of language comprehension.
引用
收藏
页码:1090 / 1102
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Children's use of allocentric cues in peripersonal and extrapersonal reach space
    Alberto, Cordova
    Gabbard, Carl P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 32 : S38 - S39
  • [42] Bilingualism and children's use of paralinguistic cues to interpret emotion in speech
    Yow, W. Quin
    Markman, Ellen M.
    [J]. BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2011, 14 (04) : 562 - 569
  • [43] Use ofgradient anticipatory nasal coarticulatory cues for lexical perception in French
    Zellou, Georgia
    Pycha, Anne
    Chitoran, Ioana
    [J]. LABORATORY PHONOLOGY, 2023, 14 (01):
  • [44] Children's use of gaze and limb movement cues to infer deception
    Rotenberg, KJ
    Sullivan, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 164 (02): : 175 - 187
  • [45] Use of prosodic and lexical cues for disambiguating wh-words in Korean
    Song, Jieun
    Jeon, Hae-Sung
    Kiaer, Jieun
    [J]. INTERSPEECH 2022, 2022, : 81 - 85
  • [46] Five-Year-Olds' and Adults' Use of Paralinguistic Cues to Overcome Referential Uncertainty
    Thacker, Justine M.
    Chambers, Craig G.
    Graham, Susan A.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [47] Use of Lexical and Affective Prosodic Cues to Emotion by Younger and Older Adults
    Dupuis, Kate
    Pichora-Fuller, Kathleen
    [J]. INTERSPEECH 2007: 8TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION, VOLS 1-4, 2007, : 813 - 816
  • [48] It's hard to be talented What possessional adjectives tell us about lexical representation
    Taft, Marcus
    Li, Sonny
    [J]. MENTAL LEXICON, 2019, 14 (01): : 124 - 151
  • [49] A bilingual advantage in 54-month-olds' use of referential cues in fast mapping
    Yow, W. Quin
    Li, Xiaoqian
    Lam, Sarah
    Gliga, Teodora
    Chong, Yap Seng
    Kwek, Kenneth
    Broekman, Birit F. P.
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2017, 20 (01)
  • [50] What Paradox? Referential Cues Allow for Infant Use of Phonetic Detail in Word Learning
    Fennell, Christopher T.
    Waxman, Sandra R.
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 81 (05) : 1376 - 1383