Sensitivity to salience: linguistic vs. visual cues affect sentence processing and pronoun resolution

被引:3
|
作者
Burmester, Juliane [1 ]
Sauermann, Antje [2 ]
Spalek, Katharina [3 ]
Wartenburger, Isabell [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Cognit Sci, Dept Linguist, Potsdam, Germany
[2] Ctr Gen Linguist ZAS, Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Dept German Language & Linguist, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Topic status; eye gaze; visual context; reading times; antecedent choice; REFERRING EXPRESSIONS; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; MENTAL MODELS; CONTEXT; COMPREHENSION; ATTENTION; SUBJECT; GAZE; PROMINENCE; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1080/23273798.2018.1428758
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Sentence comprehension is optimised by indicating entities as salient through linguistic (i.e., information-structural) or visual means. We compare how salience of a depicted referent due to a linguistic (i.e., topic status) or visual cue (i.e., a virtual person's gaze shift) modulates sentence comprehension in German. We investigated processing of sentences with varying word order and pronoun resolution by means of self-paced reading and an antecedent choice task, respectively. Our results show that linguistic as well as visual salience cues immediately speeded up reading times of sentences mentioning the salient referent first. In contrast, for pronoun resolution, linguistic and visual cues modulated antecedent choice preferences less congruently. In sum, our findings speak in favour of a significant impact of linguistic and visual salience cues on sentence comprehension, substantiating that salient information delivered via language as well as the visual environment is integrated in the current mental representation of the discourse.
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 801
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Readers’ sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: How salience influences anaphor resolution
    Celia M. Klin
    Kristin M. Weingartner
    Alexandria E. Guzmán
    William H. Levine
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2004, 32 : 511 - 522
  • [2] Readers' sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives:: How salience influences anaphor resolution
    Klin, CM
    Weingartner, KM
    Guzmán, AE
    Levine, WH
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2004, 32 (03) : 511 - 522
  • [3] Discourse-based pronoun resolution in non-native sentence processing
    Puebla, Cecilia
    Felser, Claudia
    [J]. BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2023,
  • [4] Linguistic vs. conceptual sources of implicit agents in sentence comprehension
    Mauner, G
    Koenig, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2000, 43 (01) : 110 - 134
  • [5] Featural vs. Holistic processing and visual sampling in the influence of social category cues on emotion recognition
    Craig, Belinda M.
    Chen, Nigel T. M.
    Lipp, Ottmar, V
    [J]. COGNITION & EMOTION, 2022, 36 (05) : 855 - 875
  • [6] Multimodal Affect Models: An Investigation of Relative Salience of Audio and Visual Cues for Emotion Prediction
    Wu, Jingyao
    Dang, Ting
    Sethu, Vidhyasaharan
    Ambikairajah, Eliathamby
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, 3
  • [7] One vs. two sentence processing working memories.
    Withaar, RG
    Stowe, LA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, : 35 - 35
  • [8] Introduction: Formal vs. processing explanations of linguistic phenomena
    Goodluck, Helen
    Zweig, Eytan
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2013, 28 (1-2): : 1 - 8
  • [9] Visual salience effects on speaker choices: Direct or indirect influences on linguistic processing?
    Anton-Mendez, Ines
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2017, 38 (03) : 601 - 631
  • [10] Implications of Sentence Processing and Sentence Processing Deficits for Embedded Process vs. Storage Buffer Approaches to Working Memory
    Martin, R.
    [J]. 51ST ACADEMY OF APHASIA PROCEEDINGS, 2013, 94 : 218 - 219