Flux Cored Arc Welding Parameter Optimization Using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm

被引:12
|
作者
Katherasan, D. [1 ]
Elias, Jiju V. [1 ]
Sathiya, P. [1 ]
Haq, A. Noorul [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Prod Engn, Tiruchirappalli 620015, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
FCAW; bead geometry; Regression analysis; PSO; GEOMETRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.449
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Flux cored arc welding (FCAW) process is a fusion welding process in which the welding electrode is a tubular wire that is continuously fed to the weld area. It is widely used in industries and shipyards for welding heavy plates. Welding input parameters play a very significant role in determining the quality of a weld joint. This paper addresses the modeling of welding parameters in FCAW process using a set of experimental data and regression analysis, and optimization using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) Algorithm. The input process variables considered here include wire feed rate (F); voltage (V); welding speed (S) and torch Angle (A) each having 5 levels. The process output characteristics are weld bead width, reinforcement and depth of penetration. The Taguchi method and regression modeling are used in order to establish the relationships between input and output parameters. In the next stage, the proposed model is embedded into PSO algorithm to optimize the FCAW process parameters. In this study the objectives considered are maximization of depth of penetration, minimization of bead width and minimization of reinforcement. A comparative study on the effectiveness of the two algorithms on the optimization of the weld bead geometry is done. (c) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of Noorul Islam Centre for Higher Education
引用
收藏
页码:3913 / 3926
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A parameter-free particle swarm optimization algorithm using performance classifiers
    Harrison, Kyle Robert
    Ombuki-Berman, Beatrice M.
    Engelbrecht, Andries P.
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 503 : 381 - 400
  • [22] Parameter Extraction of Physical BRDF Model Using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm
    Chen Ming
    Zhang Qinghe
    Zhou Yongyang
    [J]. 2012 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (CISP), 2012, : 1902 - 1905
  • [23] Optimization of open channels using particle swarm optimization algorithm
    Saplioglu, Kemal
    Ozturk, Tulay Sugra Kucukerdem
    Acar, Ramazan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 39 (01) : 399 - 405
  • [24] Process Parameter Optimization of AISI 316L(N) Weld Joints Produced using Flux-Cored Arc Welding Process
    Katherasan, D.
    Srivastava, Sameer
    Sathiya, P.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INDIAN INSTITUTE OF METALS, 2013, 66 (02) : 123 - 132
  • [25] Portfolio Optimization using Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm
    Kamali, Samira
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE-JMCS, 2014, 10 (02): : 85 - 90
  • [26] Acoustic radiation optimization using the particle swarm optimization algorithm
    Jeon, JY
    Okuma, M
    [J]. JSME INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL SERIES C-MECHANICAL SYSTEMS MACHINE ELEMENTS AND MANUFACTURING, 2004, 47 (02) : 560 - 567
  • [27] Source Optimization using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm in Photolithography
    Wang, Lei
    Li, Sikun
    Wang, Xiangzhao
    Yan, Guanyong
    Yang, Chaoxing
    [J]. OPTICAL MICROLITHOGRAPHY XXVIII, 2015, 9426
  • [28] Process Parameter Optimization of AISI 316L(N) Weld Joints Produced using Flux-Cored Arc Welding Process
    D. Katherasan
    Sameer Srivastava
    P. Sathiya
    [J]. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals, 2013, 66 : 123 - 132
  • [29] PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION OF THE FORGING AND FORMING PROCESS USING PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION
    Li, Nan
    [J]. International Journal of Mechatronics and Applied Mechanics, 2022, 2022 (11): : 249 - 258
  • [30] Electrochemical machining process parameter optimization using particle swarm optimization
    Jegan, Thankaraj Mariapushpam Chenthil
    Ravindran, Durairaj
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, 33 (04) : 1019 - 1037