Female genital mutilation: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Flemish gynaecologists

被引:57
|
作者
Leye, Els [1 ]
Ysebaert, Ilse [2 ]
Deblonde, Jessika [1 ]
Claeys, Patricia [1 ]
Vermeulen, Gert [2 ]
Jacquemyn, Yves [3 ]
Temmerman, Marleen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, ICRH, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, IRCP, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Antwerp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
female genital mutilation; gynaecologists; Flanders; knowledge; attitudes; practices;
D O I
10.1080/13625180701780957
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices with regard to female genital mutilation (FGM) among gynaecologists in Flanders, Belgium. Methods A questionnaire-based survey was sent to 724 Flemish gynaecologists and trainees. Results Three-hundred-and-thirty-four questionnaires were returned. The survey revealed gaps in the knowledge of FGM and the provision of care by Flemish gynaecologists to women who had been mutilated. It also appeared that FGM was not properly addressed in the basic and specialized medical training in Flanders, that little was known about codes of conduct issued by the hospitals when these were not lacking altogether, and that knowledge about legislation concerning FGM was deficient. There was much confusion whether re-infibulation is authorized, and what its legal status is. Some respondents considered cosmetic vaginal surgery as a form of FGM and many were in favour of the medicalization of FGM. Gynaecologists were most commonly confronted with complaints related to sexual problems caused by FGM. Finally, the study also showed that only about a third of the gynaecologists were discouraging women from having their daughters excised. Conclusion There is a need for a thorough discussion among all those concerned of the ethical and legal aspects of re-infibulation, medicalization of FGM and cosmetic vaginal surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 190
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Attitudes of medical students towards female genital mutilation
    Refaat, AH
    Dandash, KF
    Lotfy, G
    Eyada, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEX & MARITAL THERAPY, 2001, 27 (05) : 589 - 591
  • [22] Female genital mutilation: multiple practices, multiple wrongs
    Dunn, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2016, 42 (03) : 147 - 147
  • [23] A mixed-method synthesis of knowledge, experiences and attitudes of health professionals to Female Genital Mutilation
    Reig-Alcaraz, Maria
    Siles-Gonzalez, Jose
    Solano-Ruiz, Carmen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (02) : 245 - 260
  • [24] FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION. OVERVIEW AND CURRENT KNOWLEDGE
    Andro, Armelle
    Lesclingand, Marie
    [J]. POPULATION, 2016, 71 (02): : 225 - 311
  • [25] Knowledge of female genital mutilation among healthcare professionals
    Zaidi, N.
    Khalil, A.
    Roberts, C.
    Browne, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 27 (02) : 161 - 164
  • [26] KNOWLEDGE, BELIEFS, AND ATTITUDES TO FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION (FGM) IN SHAO COMMUNITY OF KWARA STATE, NIGERIA
    Amusan, O. A.
    Asekun-Olarinmoye, E. O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL QUARTERLY OF COMMUNITY HEALTH EDUCATION, 2008, 27 (04) : 337 - 349
  • [27] Female Genital Mutilation: Knowledge and Skills of Health Professionals
    Molina-Gallego, Brigida
    Mordillo-Mateos, Laura
    Melgar de Corral, Gonzalo
    Gomez-Cantarino, Sagrario
    Polonio-Lopez, Begona
    Ugarte-Gurrutxaga, M. Idoia
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [28] FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION - CULTURAL KNOWLEDGE IS THE KEY TO UNDERSTANDING
    WEBB, E
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7012): : 1088 - 1088
  • [29] FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION
    ALLEN, JR
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (21): : 1714 - 1716
  • [30] FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION
    LORENSEN, GJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 172 (04) : 1320 - 1321