Trade liberalization in the bio-economy: coping with a new landscape

被引:1
|
作者
Bureau, Jean-Christophe [1 ]
Jean, Sebastien [2 ]
机构
[1] AgroParisTech, UMR Econ Publ AgroParisTech INRA, F-75005 Paris, France
[2] INRA, UMR Econ Publ AgroParisTech INRA, F-75005 Paris, France
关键词
Doha Round; World Trade Organization; Agricultural trade;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12061
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Multilateral trade liberalization has made little progress over the last period, but preferential agreements have multiplied. Recent economic literature helps understand the current negotiation game. New economic and political conditions, in particular the gaining influence of emerging countries, make a multilateral agreement more difficult. Developed countries have given up many of their bargaining chips in previous rounds of negotiation and their remaining agricultural tariffs are not sufficient for extracting the concessions from emerging countries on services, procurement, and intellectual property that would make an agreement possible. The risk of a more fragmented world calls for a revised negotiation agenda and a change in the status of developing countries. Research issues are outlined in order to help revitalize the Doha negotiation agenda.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 182
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Rhizosphere biodiversity as a premise for application in bio-economy
    Uzoh, Ifeyinwa Monica
    Babalola, Olubukola Oluranti
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 265 : 524 - 534
  • [32] The political economy of liberalization and regulation: Trade policy for the new era
    Atkinson, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 1998, 32 (02) : 419 - 426
  • [34] Circular Business Models for the Bio-Economy: A Review and New Directions for Future Research
    Reim, Wiebke
    Parida, Vinit
    Sjodin, David R.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [35] ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES IN THE POLISH AGRICULTURE - TOWARD THE BIO-ECONOMY
    Pajewski, Tomasz
    [J]. ECONOMIC SCIENCE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT: RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP BIOECONOMY HOME ECONOMICS, 2016, 41 : 243 - 251
  • [36] What’s in a name? On affect, value and the bio-economy
    Paolo Palladino
    [J]. BioSocieties, 2020, 15 : 70 - 89
  • [37] South African bio-economy strategy: The toxicologists' dilemma
    van Rijssen, Wilna Jansen
    Korsten, Lise
    Naidoo, Vinny
    Eloff, Kobus
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [38] Bio-economy in Greece: Current trends and the road ahead
    Papadopoulou, Electra
    Vaitsas, Konstantinos
    Fallas, Ioannis
    Tsipas, Giorgos
    Chrissafis, Konstantinos
    Bikiaris, Dimitrios
    Kottaridi, Constantina
    Vorgias, Konstantinos E.
    [J]. EUROBIOTECH JOURNAL, 2018, 2 (03): : 137 - 145
  • [39] Trustworthiness and Responsible Research and Innovation: The Case of the Bio-Economy
    Asveld, Lotte
    Ganzevles, Jurgen
    Osseweijer, Patricia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2015, 28 (03): : 571 - 588
  • [40] Growing the bio-economy - A view from an energy refiner
    Burke, L.
    [J]. HYDROCARBON PROCESSING, 2008, 87 (02): : 35 - +