Design and comparative analysis of photovoltaic and parabolic trough based CSP plants

被引:72
|
作者
Awan, Ahmed Bilal [1 ]
Zubair, Muhammad [1 ]
Praveen, R. P. [1 ]
Bhatti, Abdul Rauf [2 ]
机构
[1] Majmaah Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Coll Engn, Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Faisalabad, Govt Coll, Dept Elect Engn, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
关键词
Photovoltaic; Concentrated solar power; Parabolic trough collector; Levelized cost of energy; CSP; PV; CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER; BATTERY STORAGE-SYSTEMS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; GENERATION; TECHNOLOGIES; COST; PROGRESS; DESERT;
D O I
10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.037
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Solar energy can be exploited by two main methods to produce electrical energy, by means of photovoltaic (PV) panels to directly convert the sunlight into electrical energy and by using thermodynamic cycle with the help of concentrated solar power (CSP) approach to convert the heat of the sun into electricity. The objective of this research is to design and evaluate the performance of these two main methods of electrical energy generation at three different sites in Saudi Arabia. The parabolic trough CSP plant uses synthetic oil as heat transfer fluid and molten salt for the thermal energy storage system. Both CSP and PV plants have been designed for the same nameplate capacity of 100 MW. The technical comparison is performed based on solar to electrical efficiency, electrical output, capacity utilization factor, and land use factor while economic comparison includes net present value (NPV), net capital cost (NCC), levelized cost of energy (LCOE), and payback period. CSP plants have better electrical output and capacity utilization factor compared to PV plants while PV plants exhibit far better economic performance. Tabuk site is proven to be the best location for both CSP and PV plants. The best case CSP plant has 33.3% more electrical energy generation compared to the best-case PV plant. The capacity utilization factor of the CSP plant is 45.4% vs. 30.2% for PV plant. The CSP plant has 4.5 times higher NCC compared to PV plant. The LCOE of CSP plant is 2.73 times higher than that of PV plant. Overall CSP technology has better technical performance while PV technology is economically more feasible than the CSP technology at the proposed locations. This comparison between the two technologies could provide very useful guidelines for policy maker to choose the appropriate technology for a project.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 565
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On Purpose Simulation Model For Molten Salt CSP Parabolic Trough
    Caranese, Carlo
    Matino, Francesca
    Maccari, Augusto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER AND CHEMICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS (SOLARPACES 2016), 2017, 1850
  • [32] Design and Analysis of a CPV Retrofit for Parabolic Trough Powerplants
    Wingert, Rhetta
    Otanicar, Todd
    Orosz, Matthew
    Yetter, Kendall
    McPheeters, Clay
    Sharps, Paul
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 7TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY CONVERSION (WCPEC) (A JOINT CONFERENCE OF 45TH IEEE PVSC, 28TH PVSEC & 34TH EU PVSEC), 2018, : 0931 - 0936
  • [33] Design analysis of solar parabolic trough thermal collectors
    Hafez, A. Z.
    Attia, A. M.
    Eltwab, H. S.
    ElKousy, A. O.
    Afifi, A. A.
    AbdElhamid, A. G.
    AbdElqader, A. N.
    Fateen, S-E. K.
    El-Metwally, K. A.
    Soliman, A.
    Ismail, I. M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 : 1215 - 1260
  • [34] Thermo-economic analysis of photovoltaic, central tower receiver and parabolic trough power plants for Herat city in Afghanistan
    Hakimi, M.
    Baniasadi, E.
    Afshari, E.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 150 : 840 - 853
  • [35] Optimization of dry cooled parabolic trough (CSP) plants for the desert regions of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)
    Qoaider, Louy
    Liqreina, Ahmad
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2015, 122 : 976 - 985
  • [36] Evaluation of classification methods according to solar radiation features from the viewpoint of the production of parabolic trough CSP plants
    Moreno-Tejera, S.
    Silva-Perez, M. A.
    Ramirez-Santigosa, L.
    Lillo-Bravo, I.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 121 : 429 - 440
  • [37] Design and optimization of CSP power plants for Pakistan: a comparative study
    Liaqat, Kashif
    Ordonez, Juan C.
    [J]. CLEAN ENERGY, 2023, 7 (03): : 690 - 704
  • [38] Assessing the feasibility of retrofitting parabolic trough power plants with integrated photovoltaic systems for grid integration
    Lopez-Alvarez, Jose A.
    Larraneta, Miguel
    Lillo-Bravo, Isidoro
    Silva-Perez, Manuel A.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 374
  • [39] Improvement Design of Parabolic Trough
    Ihsan, S. I.
    Safian, M. A. I. M.
    Taufek, M. A. M.
    Mohiuddin, A. K. M.
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL, AUTOMOTIVE AND AEROSPACE ENGINEERING 2016, 2017, 184
  • [40] A Numerical Model for Off-Design Performance Prediction of Parabolic Trough Based Solar Power Plants
    Manzolini, Giampaolo
    Giostri, Andrea
    Saccilotto, Claudio
    Silva, Paolo
    Macchi, Ennio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2012, 134 (01):