Design and comparative analysis of photovoltaic and parabolic trough based CSP plants

被引:72
|
作者
Awan, Ahmed Bilal [1 ]
Zubair, Muhammad [1 ]
Praveen, R. P. [1 ]
Bhatti, Abdul Rauf [2 ]
机构
[1] Majmaah Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Coll Engn, Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Faisalabad, Govt Coll, Dept Elect Engn, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
关键词
Photovoltaic; Concentrated solar power; Parabolic trough collector; Levelized cost of energy; CSP; PV; CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER; BATTERY STORAGE-SYSTEMS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; GENERATION; TECHNOLOGIES; COST; PROGRESS; DESERT;
D O I
10.1016/j.solener.2019.03.037
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Solar energy can be exploited by two main methods to produce electrical energy, by means of photovoltaic (PV) panels to directly convert the sunlight into electrical energy and by using thermodynamic cycle with the help of concentrated solar power (CSP) approach to convert the heat of the sun into electricity. The objective of this research is to design and evaluate the performance of these two main methods of electrical energy generation at three different sites in Saudi Arabia. The parabolic trough CSP plant uses synthetic oil as heat transfer fluid and molten salt for the thermal energy storage system. Both CSP and PV plants have been designed for the same nameplate capacity of 100 MW. The technical comparison is performed based on solar to electrical efficiency, electrical output, capacity utilization factor, and land use factor while economic comparison includes net present value (NPV), net capital cost (NCC), levelized cost of energy (LCOE), and payback period. CSP plants have better electrical output and capacity utilization factor compared to PV plants while PV plants exhibit far better economic performance. Tabuk site is proven to be the best location for both CSP and PV plants. The best case CSP plant has 33.3% more electrical energy generation compared to the best-case PV plant. The capacity utilization factor of the CSP plant is 45.4% vs. 30.2% for PV plant. The CSP plant has 4.5 times higher NCC compared to PV plant. The LCOE of CSP plant is 2.73 times higher than that of PV plant. Overall CSP technology has better technical performance while PV technology is economically more feasible than the CSP technology at the proposed locations. This comparison between the two technologies could provide very useful guidelines for policy maker to choose the appropriate technology for a project.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 565
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gases as working fluid in parabolic trough CSP plants
    Cipollone, Roberto
    Cinocca, Andrea
    Gualtieri, Angelo
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AMBIENT SYSTEMS, NETWORKS AND TECHNOLOGIES (ANT 2013), THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (SEIT-2013), 2013, 19 : 702 - 711
  • [2] Adjustment and Validation of a Simulation Tool for CSP Plants based on Parabolic Trough Technology
    Garcia-Barberena, Javier
    Ubani, Nora
    [J]. SOLARPACES 2015: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER AND CHEMICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 1734
  • [3] Impact of parabolic trough collector model on the CSP plants' performance
    Begdouri, O. Achkari
    El Fadar, A.
    [J]. THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2022, 34
  • [4] Commercial parabolic trough CSP plants: Research trends and technological advancements
    Awan, Ahmed Bilal
    Khan, M. N.
    Zubair, Muhammad
    Bellos, Evangelos
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2020, 211 : 1422 - 1458
  • [5] Hydrogen Reduction in Heat Transfer Fluid in Parabolic Trough CSP Plants
    Lang, Christoph
    Belkheir, Mohamed
    Kim, Eungkyu
    Davidson, Chet
    Holden, Bruce
    Hook, Bruce
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER AND CHEMICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS (SOLARPACES 2016), 2017, 1850
  • [6] Cost reduction potential in parabolic trough collector based CSP plants: A case study for India
    Aseri, Tarun Kumar
    Sharma, Chandan
    Kandpal, Tara C.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 138
  • [7] Spatial comparative analysis of parabolic trough collectors and photovoltaic systems in Saudi Arabia
    Khan, Muhammad Azhar Ali
    Muhammad, Baqir
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2016, 13 (04) : 300 - 310
  • [8] A Review of Andasol 3 and Perspective for Parabolic Trough CSP Plants in South Africa
    Dinter, Frank
    Moeller, Lucas
    [J]. SOLARPACES 2015: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER AND CHEMICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 1734
  • [9] The cost of integration of parabolic trough CSP plants in isolated Mediterranean power systems
    Poullikkas, Andreas
    Hadjipaschalis, Ioannis
    Kourtis, George
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (05): : 1469 - 1476
  • [10] The Impact of Dispatchability of Parabolic Trough CSP Plants over PV Power Plants in Palestinian Territories
    Yasin, Aysar M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHOTOENERGY, 2019, 2019