A new approach for Bayesian model averaging

被引:13
|
作者
Tian XiangJun [1 ,2 ]
Xie ZhengHui [2 ]
Wang AiHui [3 ]
Yang XiaoChun [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, Int Ctr Climate & Environm Sci, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, State Key Lab Numer Modeling Atmospher Sci & Geop, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, Nansen Zhu Int Res Ctr, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[4] Meterol Bur Xian City, Xian 710016, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bayesian model averaging; multi-model ensemble forecasts; BMA-BFGS; limited memory quasi-Newtonian algorithm; land surface models; soil moisture; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11430-011-4307-x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Bayesian model averaging (BMA) is a recently proposed statistical method for calibrating forecast ensembles from numerical weather models. However, successful implementation of BMA requires accurate estimates of the weights and variances of the individual competing models in the ensemble. Two methods, namely the Expectation-Maximization (EM) and the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms, are widely used for BMA model training. Both methods have their own respective strengths and weaknesses. In this paper, we first modify the BMA log-likelihood function with the aim of removing the additional limitation that requires that the BMA weights add to one, and then use a limited memory quasi-Newtonian algorithm for solving the nonlinear optimization problem, thereby formulating a new approach for BMA (referred to as BMA-BFGS). Several groups of multi-model soil moisture simulation experiments from three land surface models show that the performance of BMA-BFGS is similar to the MCMC method in terms of simulation accuracy, and that both are superior to the EM algorithm. On the other hand, the computational cost of the BMA-BFGS algorithm is substantially less than for MCMC and is almost equivalent to that for EM.
引用
收藏
页码:1336 / 1344
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A new approach for Bayesian model averaging
    TIAN XiangJun1
    2 State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics
    3 Nansen-Zhu International Research Centre
    4 Meterological Bureau of Xi’an City
    [J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2012, 55 (08) : 1336 - 1344
  • [2] A new approach for Bayesian model averaging
    XiangJun Tian
    ZhengHui Xie
    AiHui Wang
    XiaoChun Yang
    [J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2012, 55 : 1336 - 1344
  • [3] Semiparametric model averaging prediction: a Bayesian approach
    Wang, Jingli
    Li, Jialiang
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2018, 60 (04) : 407 - 422
  • [4] The resource curse revisited: A Bayesian model averaging approach
    Arin, K. Peren
    Braunfels, Elias
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 70 : 170 - 178
  • [5] The Socioeconomic Determinants of Terrorism: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach
    Sanso-Navarro, Marcos
    Vera-Cabello, Maria
    [J]. DEFENCE AND PEACE ECONOMICS, 2020, 31 (03) : 269 - 288
  • [6] A New Algorithm of Bayesian Model Averaging Based on SCE - UA Collection Averaging
    Liu Jun-Hua
    Zhang Hong-Qin
    Zhang Cheng-Ming
    Zhao Tianyu
    Ma Jing
    [J]. COMPUTER AND COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES IN AGRICULTURE VIII, 2015, 452 : 351 - 358
  • [7] A New Algorithm in Bayesian Model Averaging in Regression Models
    Fan, Tsai-Hung
    Wang, Guo-Tzau
    Yu, Jenn-Hwa
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2014, 43 (02) : 315 - 328
  • [8] FORECASTING REALIZED VOLATILITY: A BAYESIAN MODEL-AVERAGING APPROACH
    Liu, Chun
    Maheu, John M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2009, 24 (05) : 709 - 733
  • [9] What Determines the Sacrifice Ratio? A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach
    Katayama, Hajime
    Ponomareva, Natalia
    Sharma, Malvin
    [J]. OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2019, 81 (05) : 960 - 988
  • [10] On predicting the semiconductor industry cycle: a Bayesian model averaging approach
    Liu, Wen-Hsien
    Weng, Shu-Shih
    [J]. EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 54 (02) : 673 - 703