The relationship between audit fees and audit committee characteristics: evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange

被引:13
|
作者
Drogalas, George [1 ]
Nerantzidis, Michail [2 ]
Mitskinis, Dimitrios [1 ]
Tampakoudis, Ioannis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Macedonia, Sch Business Adm, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Univ Thessaly, Sch Econ & Business, Larisa, Greece
关键词
Audit committees; CG; Greek legislation; Audit expenses; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; BOARD CHARACTERISTICS; ACCOUNTING EXPERTISE; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; NONAUDIT SERVICES; EXTERNAL AUDITORS; INTERNAL CONTROL; QUALITY; ASSOCIATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1057/s41310-020-00088-9
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Strengthening the audit committee is an increasingly important element in the agenda of academics, practitioners and policy-makers in their effort to improve the quality of financial information and to promote audit quality. In this research, we examine the relationship between audit committee characteristics and audit and non-audit fees paid to auditors throughout the first year of the implementation of Law 4449/2017 in Greece. Using a sample of 126 listed companies on the Athens Stock Exchange, we show that audit committee characteristics (i.e. AC size, frequency of meetings and the presence of at least one member with previous experience in a similar position) have a positive relationship with audit fees. Moreover, we find that board size is positively associated with audit fees, which means that the assignment of new roles to audit committees has not been realized to its full potential as recent Law 4449/2017 highlights. Finally, we present evidence that audit committees with a high percentage of members with previous experience in audit committees may be less willing to allow a disproportionate provision of non-audit services in relation to total fees. On that basis, our study offers insights to Greek legislators, auditors, boards and corporate governance scholars.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 41
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Audit firm rotation and audit report: evidence from the Tehran Stock Exchange
    Mohammadi, Saman
    Maharlouie, Mohammad Monfared
    Noori, Sepideh Kazemi
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2015, 29 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [32] Female audit committee members and their influence on audit fees
    Aldamen, Husam
    Hollindale, Janice
    Ziegelmayer, Jennifer L.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2018, 58 (01): : 57 - 89
  • [33] Audit committee effectiveness and non-audit service fees: Evidence from UK family firms
    Al-Okaily, Jihad
    BenYoussef, Nourhene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND TAXATION, 2020, 41
  • [34] Is Audit Committee Equity Compensation Related to Audit Fees?*
    Liu, Xinming
    Lobo, Gerald J.
    Yu, Hung-Chao
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2021, 38 (01) : 740 - 769
  • [35] Audit committee compensation, best practices and audit fees
    Park, Bum-Jin
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 50 (01)
  • [36] Does audit quality mediate the relationship between audit firm size and audit fees?
    Bader, Ayman
    Nawaiseh, Mohammad Ebrahim
    Nawaiseh, Halla Noor
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND FINANCE, 2019, 6 (04) : 279 - 294
  • [37] Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality: Evidence from the Korean Audit Market
    Behrend, Matthew J.
    Khan, Sarfraz
    Ko, Young Woo
    Park, Sung-Jin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2020, 19 (03) : 37 - 60
  • [38] Audit Market Concentration, Audit Fees, and Audit Quality: Evidence from China
    Huang, Ting-Chiao
    Chang, Hsihui
    Chiou, Jeng-Ren
    [J]. AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2016, 35 (02): : 121 - 145
  • [39] Audit committee impact on the quality of financial reporting and disclosure Evidence from the Tehran Stock Exchange
    Salehi, Mahdi
    Shirazi, Mohammadamin
    [J]. MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2016, 39 (12): : 1639 - 1662
  • [40] Modelling issues in the relationship between audit and non-audit fees
    Adelopo, Ismail
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2009, 10 (02) : 96 - +