Comparison of short-term light disturbance, optical and visual performance outcomes between a myopia control contact lens and a single-vision contact lens

被引:25
|
作者
Vicente Garcia-Marques, Jose [1 ]
Juliana Macedo-De-Araujo, Rute [2 ]
Cervino, Alejandro [1 ]
Garcia-Lazaro, Santiago [1 ]
McAlinden, Colm [3 ,4 ]
Manuel Gonzalez-Meijome, Jose [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Dept Opt & Optometry & Vis Sci, Optometry Res Grp, Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Minho, Ctr Phys Optometry, Sch Sci, Clin & Expt Optometry Res Lab CEORLab, Braga, Portugal
[3] Swansea Bay Univ Hlth Board, Singleton Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
[4] Wenzhou Med Univ, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
light disturbance; MiSight; multifocal contact lens; myopia control; visual performance; visual quality; MISIGHT ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY; QUALITY; PROGRESSION; SPAIN; GLARE;
D O I
10.1111/opo.12729
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare the optical and visual performance of a dual-focus (DF) contact lens used for myopia control with a single-vision (SV) contact lens of the same material. Methods A randomised, double-masked crossover study. Twenty-eight healthy, myopic volunteers between 18 and 32 years of age (23.49 +/- 4.07 years) participated in this study. The sensory dominant eye for distance vision was determined. Refraction, best-corrected visual acuity (VA) and aberrations for 3 mm and 5 mm pupil diameters were quantified without a contact lens in situ. Subjects were fitted with two contact lens designs: DF and SV, both made of omafilcon A material. The Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire, over-refraction, best-corrected VA, stereopsis at 40 cm, best-corrected photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity, light disturbance and aberrations were assessed 25 min after contact lens insertion. Results There were no statistically significant differences in best-corrected VA and stereopsis between the baseline, DF and SV conditions. Photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity were lower for the DF contact lens at all frequencies, with the exception of the mesopic contrast sensitivity at 18 cycles per degree (p = 0.23). Higher order aberrations and light disturbance size and irregularity were higher for the DF contact lens (p < 0.001). No differences were found in higher order aberrations between baseline and the SV contact lens condition for each pupil diameter. QoV scores also revealed lower frequency, severity and bothersome scores with the SV contact lens than with the DF contact lens (p < 0.001). Conclusions The DF contact lens design decreased the psychophysical and psychometric visual quality scores in the short-term under dim-light conditions when compared with a single-vision contact lens design of the same material. VA and stereopsis were unaffected by the lens design.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 727
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Comparison of visual performance and image quality between a myopia-control contact lens and a single-vision contact lens
    Han, Ding
    Zhang, Ziyu
    Li, Bingqin
    Rong, Hua
    Song, Desheng
    Du, Bei
    Wei, Ruihua
    [J]. CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2023, 46 (05):
  • [2] Comparison of visual performance between extended depth of focus contact lens and single-vision contact lens in eyes with monofocal intraocular lens
    Hiraoka, Takahiro
    Kiuchi, Gaku
    Hiraoka, Reia
    Kotsuka, Junko
    Kinoshita, Yumiko
    Oshika, Tetsuro
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 65 (06) : 803 - 809
  • [3] Comparison of visual performance between extended depth of focus contact lens and single-vision contact lens in eyes with monofocal intraocular lens
    Takahiro Hiraoka
    Gaku Kiuchi
    Reia Hiraoka
    Junko Kotsuka
    Yumiko Kinoshita
    Tetsuro Oshika
    [J]. Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, 2021, 65 : 803 - 809
  • [4] Changes in accommodation and behavioural performance with a contact lens for myopia management: A comparison between a dual-focus and a single-vision soft contact lens
    Redondo, Beatriz
    Vera, Jesus
    Molina, Ruben
    Galan, Tomas
    Machado, Pedro
    Jimenez, Raimundo
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2022, 42 (04) : 753 - 761
  • [5] Visual performance comparison between contact lens-based pinhole and simultaneous vision contact lenses
    Garcia-Lazaro, Santiago
    Albarran-Diego, Cesar
    Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
    Radhakrishnan, Hema
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2013, 96 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [6] Visual Performance and Higher Order Aberrations Obtained With Omafilcon A Dual-Focus and Single-Vision Contact Lens Designs
    Valencia-Nieto, Laura
    Novo-Diez, Andrea
    Mangas-Alonso, Maria
    Rojas-Lopez, Alba
    Lopez-de la Rosa, Alberto
    Lopez-Miguel, Alberto
    [J]. EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 50 (01): : 29 - 34
  • [7] Utility of Short-Term Evaluation of Presbyopic Contact Lens Performance
    Papas, Eric B.
    Decenzo-Verbeten, Teresa
    Fonn, Desmond
    Holden, Brien A.
    Kollbaum, Pete S.
    Situ, Ping
    Tan, Jackie
    Woods, Craig
    [J]. EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2009, 35 (03): : 144 - 148
  • [8] Predicting Short-Term Subjective Vision Performance of Contact Lenses Used in Myopia Control
    Diec, Jennie
    Tilia, Daniel
    Thomas, Varghese
    Bakaraju, Ravi C.
    [J]. EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 44 (05): : 308 - 315
  • [9] Short-term visual outcome with sclerocorneal contact lens on irregular cornea
    Noufal, K. Husna
    Babu, Shruthi P.
    [J]. SAUDI JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 37 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [10] Visual performance with an extended depth of focus contact lens for myopia control and corneal topography in assessing lens centration
    Rizzo, G. C.
    Borghesi, A.
    Di Vizio, A.
    Zeri, F.
    Ponzini, E.
    Tavazzi, S.
    [J]. NUOVO CIMENTO C-COLLOQUIA AND COMMUNICATIONS IN PHYSICS, 2023, 46 (05):