Bioenergy production and use: Comparative analysis of the economic and environmental effects

被引:39
|
作者
Hennig, Christiane [1 ]
Gawor, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] German Biomass Res Ctr DBFZ, D-04347 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Bioenergy; Life cycle assessment; Greenhouse gases; Economic assessment; CO2 abatement costs;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2012.03.031
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study analyses the use of liquid, solid and gaseous biomass for power generation in Germany with respect to the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG), a significant policy instrument for promoting electricity generation based on renewable energy sources. The aim is the identification of bioenergy conversion pathways that have a low environmental impact and are cost-effective. To achieve this objective several research steps were undertaken, including a life-cycle analysis (LCA), economic analysis and the determination of the CO2 abatement costs. Besides, the authors show and discuss how a simplification of the environmental assessment by considering only the impact category greenhouse gases or the application of different calculation methodologies (i.e. allocation rules between electricity and heat produced) can affect the results. Overall the results show that the use of solid (wood) and gaseous biomass pathways causes both the lowest environmental impacts and electricity production costs when used for electricity generation. The choice of the modelling and calculation methodology may significantly influence the outcome (i.e. application of an exergetic allocation increases the environmental burden related to electricity generation). The lowest CO2-abatement costs were determined for the biodegradable waste pathway. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 137
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of sewage sludge in bioenergy production-A case study on the effects on sorghum biomass production
    Kolodziej, Barbara
    Antonkiewicz, Jacek
    Stachyra, Magdalena
    Bielinska, Elzbieta J.
    Wisniewski, Janusz
    Luchowska, Katarzyna
    Kwiatkowski, Cezary
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2015, 69 : 63 - 74
  • [32] A Review on Miscanthus Biomass Production and Composition for Bioenergy Use: Genotypic and Environmental Variability and Implications for Breeding
    Arnoult, Stephanie
    Brancourt-Hulmel, Maryse
    [J]. BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2015, 8 (02) : 502 - 526
  • [33] A Review on Miscanthus Biomass Production and Composition for Bioenergy Use: Genotypic and Environmental Variability and Implications for Breeding
    Stéphanie Arnoult
    Maryse Brancourt-Hulmel
    [J]. BioEnergy Research, 2015, 8 : 502 - 526
  • [34] Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of sustainable bioenergy production: a review
    Ahmed I. Osman
    Bingbing Fang
    Yubing Zhang
    Yunfei Liu
    Jiacheng Yu
    Mohamed Farghali
    Ahmed K. Rashwan
    Zhonghao Chen
    Lin Chen
    Ikko Ihara
    David W. Rooney
    Pow-Seng Yap
    [J]. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2024, 22 : 1115 - 1154
  • [35] Effects of bioenergy production on ecosystem services
    Clarke, Nicholas
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2016, 31 (02) : 235 - 235
  • [36] Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of sustainable bioenergy production: a review
    Osman, Ahmed I.
    Fang, Bingbing
    Zhang, Yubing
    Liu, Yunfei
    Yu, Jiacheng
    Farghali, Mohamed
    Rashwan, Ahmed K.
    Chen, Zhonghao
    Chen, Lin
    Ihara, Ikko
    Rooney, David W.
    Yap, Pow-Seng
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2024, 22 (03) : 1115 - 1154
  • [37] Bioenergy and economic analysis of soybean-based crop production systems in central India
    Mandal, KG
    Saha, KP
    Ghosh, PK
    Hati, KM
    Bandyopadhyay, KK
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2002, 23 (05): : 337 - 345
  • [38] Environmental and Economic Value Studies In the Use of the Tomatoes Production Land
    Azhar, Zul
    Aimon, Hasdi
    Elida
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND PADANG INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, BUSINESS AND ACCOUNTING (PICEEBA-2 2018), 2018, 64 : 180 - 185
  • [39] Environmental performance assessment of Napier grass for bioenergy production
    Nimmanterdwong, Prathana
    Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon
    Ostergard, Hanne
    Piumsomboon, Pornpote
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 165 : 645 - 655
  • [40] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF COMBINED BIOCHAR AND BIOENERGY PRODUCTION
    Fryda, Lydia
    Schmidt, Jannick
    Visser, Rianne
    [J]. PAPERS OF THE 26TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2018, : 1311 - 1319