Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars

被引:140
|
作者
Monaco, G
Montevecchi, M
Bonetti, GA
Gatto, MRA
Checchi, L
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Sch Dent, Dept Periodontol, I-40125 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, I-40125 Bologna, Italy
来源
关键词
D O I
10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0179
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background. The authors conducted a study to evaluate the predictive value of five radiographic markers on the panoramic radiograph, or PR, to point out the relationship between the mandibular canal and the impacted third molar. Methods. The authors evaluated the accuracy of the radiographic markers by comparing the PR with an axial computed tomographic, or CT, scan. They identified a sample of 73 third molars that showed a close relationship between the tooth roots and the madibular canal on the PR, and then classified them on the basis of five radiographic markers. They also detected contact between the third molar and the mandibular canal on the CT scan. Results. The distribution of the five radiographic markers was as follows: 37 teeth exhibited increased radiolucency, 13 exhibited superimposition, 14 exhibited interruption of the radiopaque border, 14 exhibited narrowing of the canal and seven exhibited diversion of the canal. In 11 cases, two or more markers were recognizable. The predictive values of a positive test result were as follows: increased radiolucency, 73 percent; superimposition, 38.5 percent; interruption of the radiopaque border, 71.4 percent; narrowing, 78.6 percent; and diversion, 100 percent. The authors detected contact in all of the cases that exhibited two or more markers. Conclusion. Increased radiolucency, narrowing and interruption of the radiopaque border, as well as the concomitant presence of two or more radiographic markers, on the PR were highly predictive of contact between the third molar and the mandibular canal. An axial CT scan probably is indicated in such cases. Clinical Implications. The results of this study may lead to some guidelines for oral surgeons evaluating whether to obtain an axial CT scan for further investigation after examining an impacted mandibular third molar via PR.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 318
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study between multilayer and conventional panoramic radiography
    Machado, Alessiana Helena
    Freitas, Deborah Queiroz
    Fontenele, Rocharles Cavalcante
    Farias-Gomes, Amanda
    Francesquini Junior, Luiz
    Ambrosano, Glaucia Maria Bovi
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 27 (11) : 6451 - 6460
  • [32] Radiographic evaluation of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study between multilayer and conventional panoramic radiography
    Alessiana Helena Machado
    Deborah Queiroz Freitas
    Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele
    Amanda Farias-Gomes
    Luiz Francesquini Júnior
    Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023, 27 : 6451 - 6460
  • [33] Comparison of panoramic radiography with cone beam CT in predicting the relationship of the mandibular third molar roots to the alveolar canal
    Shahidi, Shoaleh
    Zamiri, Barbod
    Bronoosh, Pegah
    IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2013, 43 (02) : 105 - 109
  • [34] Contiguity between the mandibular canal and the mandibular third molar in panoramic tomography compared with cone beam computed tomography: a topographic analysis
    Deppe, Herbert
    Ritschl, Lucas M.
    Kleinschmidt, Jana
    Wagenpfeil, Stefan
    Sculean, Anton
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 50 (06): : 470 - 477
  • [35] Correlating the clinical assessment of impacted mandibular third molars with panoramic radiograph and intraoral periapical radiograph
    Priya, P. Vani
    Nasyam, Fazil A.
    Ramprasad, M.
    Penumatsa, Narendra V.
    Akifuddin, Syed
    Sandeep
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PREVENTIVE AND COMMUNITY DENTISTRY, 2016, 6 : S219 - S225
  • [36] Orthodontic extraction: Riskless extraction of impacted lower third molars close to the mandibular canal
    Bonetti, Giulio Alessandri
    Bendandi, Michele
    Laino, Luigi
    Checchi, Vittorio
    Checchi, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 65 (12) : 2580 - 2586
  • [37] Assessment of impacted and partially impacted lower third molars with panoramic radiography compared to MRI-a proof of principle study
    Kirnbauer, Barbara
    Jakse, Norbert
    Rugani, Petra
    Schwaiger, Michael
    Magyar, Marton
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 47 (04)
  • [38] Comma incision for impacted mandibular third molars
    Nageshwar
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 60 (12) : 1506 - 1509
  • [39] Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography
    Ghaeminia, H.
    Meijer, G. J.
    Soehardi, A.
    Borstlap, W. A.
    Mulder, J.
    Berge, S. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 38 (09) : 964 - 971
  • [40] Evaluation of the effectiveness of panoramic radiography in impacted mandibular third molars on deep learning models developed with findings obtained with cone beam computed tomography
    Guller, Mustafa Taha
    Kumbasar, Nida
    Miloglu, Ozkan
    ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2025, 41 (02) : 260 - 275