Emergy evaluation of the performance and sustainability of three agricultural systems with different scales and management

被引:128
|
作者
Martin, JF
Diemont, SAW
Powell, E
Stanton, M
Levy-Tacher, S
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Ecol Engn Grp, Dept Food Agr & Biol Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Hort & Crop Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Colegio Frontera Sur, Div Conservat & Biodivers, Dept Ecol & Terrestrial Syst, Carratera Panamer & Perifer Sur, Chiapas, Mexico
关键词
resource use; production environmental impact; corn; maize; blackberry; Lacandon maya;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2005.12.016
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Emergy analysis was used to analyze three agricultural systems to compare and contrast resource use, productivity, environmental impact, and overall sustainability. Emergy analysis was appropriate for this task because of its ability to transform different types of inputs to a common form (solar energy equivalents) to allow meaningful comparisons across the three systems. The systems analyzed were conventional corn (Zea mays L.) production in Kansas, USA, blackberry (Rubus rubus Watson) production in Ohio, USA, and a Lacandon polycultural rotation system in Chiapas, Mexico. Despite these different systems and diverse inputs, emergy allowed the quantification and comparison of flows for each system on a common basis. This allowed system-level conclusions and demonstrated the utility of emergy analysis when evaluating agricultural systems. The greatest inputs of emergy across the three systems were for fertilization and irrigation of the corn system. These two inputs accounted for 95% of the purchased emergy input to the corn system. The indigenous system was most reliant on renewable resources, and therefore, had the lowest level of environmental loading. The sustainability index for the three systems ranged from 0.06 for the corn system, to 0.65 for the blackberry system, to 115.98 for the indigenous system. The respective energy and emergy yield for each system were 2.6E9 J ha(-1) year(-1) and 3.57E15 sej ha-1 year(-1) for the indigenous system, 3.71E10 J ha(-1) year(-1) and 8.59E15 sej ha(-1) year(-1) for the blackberry system, and 1.40E11 J ha(-1) year(-1) and 1.30E16 sej ha(-1) year(-1) for the corn system. While the indigenous system has the highest level of sustainability, its energy yield was 14 times less than the blackberry system, and 53 times less than the corn system. The results confirm the need for food production systems with large yields that are more dependent on renewable energies. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 140
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sustainability performance evaluation of agricultural cooperatives’ operations: a systemic review of the literature
    Jaqueline Marcis
    Sandro Cesar Bortoluzzi
    Edson Pinheiro de Lima
    Sérgio Eduardo Gouvêa da Costa
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2019, 21 : 1111 - 1126
  • [42] Sustainability performance evaluation of agricultural cooperatives' operations: a systemic review of the literature
    Marcis, Jaqueline
    Bortoluzzi, Sandro Cesar
    de Lima, Edson Pinheiro
    Gouvea da Costa, Sergio Eduardo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 21 (03) : 1111 - 1126
  • [43] Developing water, energy, and food sustainability performance indicators for agricultural systems
    Soheila Zarei
    Omid Bozorg-Haddad
    Vijay P. Singh
    Hugo A. Loáiciga
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [44] Performance evaluation of three different pretreatment systems for seawater reverse osmosis technique
    BouHamad, S
    AbdelJawad, M
    Ebrahim, S
    AlMansour, M
    AlHijji, A
    [J]. DESALINATION, 1997, 110 (1-2) : 85 - 91
  • [45] Environmental performance of a XIV Century water management system: An emergy evaluation of cultural heritage
    Rugani, B.
    Pulselli, R. M.
    Niccolucci, V.
    Bastianoni, S.
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2011, 56 (01) : 117 - 125
  • [46] HOW DIFFERENT ARE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS? EMPIRICAL TYPOLOGY OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
    Kadak, Tarmo
    Laitinen, Erkki K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 24 (02) : 368 - 386
  • [47] Sustainability in performance measurement and management systems for supply chains
    Liebetruth, Thomas
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE OF YOUNG SCIENTISTS ON SUSTAINABLE, MODERN AND SAFE TRANSPORT, 2017, 192 : 539 - 544
  • [48] Emergy evaluation and economic performance of banana cropping systems in Guadeloupe (French West Indies)
    de Barros, Inacio
    Blazy, Jean Marc
    Rodrigues, Geraldo Stachetti
    Tournebize, Regis
    Cinna, Jean Pierre
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 129 (04) : 437 - 449
  • [49] Integrated water quality, emergy and economic evaluation of three bioremediation treatment systems for eutrophic water
    Lu, Hongfang
    Yuan, Yaguang
    Campbell, Daniel E.
    Qin, Pei
    Cui, Lijuan
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 69 : 244 - 254
  • [50] Towards sustainability management systems in three Swedish local authorities
    Emilsson, Sara
    Hjelm, Olof
    [J]. LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 14 (08) : 721 - 732