Towards Bridging the Data Exchange Gap Between Atomistic Simulation and Larger Scale Models

被引:1
|
作者
Reith, David [1 ]
Christensen, Mikael [1 ]
Wolf, Walter [1 ]
Wimmer, Erich [1 ]
Schmitz, Georg J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mat Design SARL, 42 Ave Verdier, F-92120 Montrouge, France
[2] Access eV, MICRESS Grp, Intzestr 5, D-52072 Aachen, Germany
关键词
Integrated computational materials engineering (ICME); Materials modeling; Software; Interoperability; Industrial deployment; HDF5; Multiscale modelling; Metadata; Hierarchy;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-57864-4_5
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Materials properties are rooted in the atomic scale. Thus, an atomistic understanding of the physics and chemistry is the foundation of computational materials engineering. The MedeA computational environment provides a highly efficient platform for atomistic simulations to predict materials properties from the fundamental interactions effective at the nanoscale. Nevertheless, many interactions and processes occur at much larger time and length scales, that need to be described with microscale and macroscale models, as exemplified by the multiphase field tool MICRESS. The predictive power of these larger scale models can be greatly increased by augmenting them with atomistic simulation data. The notion of per phase-properties including their anisotropies provides e.g., the key for the determination of effective properties of multiphase materials. The key goal of the present work is to generate a common interface between atomistic and larger scale models using a data centric approach, in which the "interface" is provided by means of a standardized data structure based on the hierarchical data format HDF5. The example HDF5 file created by Schmitz et al., Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 17 (2016) 411, describing a three phase Al-Cu microstructure, is taken and extended to include atomistic simulation data of the Al-Cu phases, e.g., heats of formation, elastic properties, interfacial energies etc. This is pursued with special attention on using metadata to increase transparency and reproducibility of the data provided by the atomistic simulation tool MedeA.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 55
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bridging the Gap Between Lab Scale and Full Scale Catalysis Experimentation
    Sjoblom, J.
    [J]. TOPICS IN CATALYSIS, 2013, 56 (1-8) : 287 - 292
  • [32] Bridging the Gap Between Lab Scale and Full Scale Catalysis Experimentation
    J. Sjöblom
    [J]. Topics in Catalysis, 2013, 56 : 287 - 292
  • [33] Data-driven material models for atomistic simulation
    Wood, M. A.
    Cusentino, M. A.
    Wirth, B. D.
    Thompson, A. P.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2019, 99 (18)
  • [34] Bridging the gap between business models and workflow specifications
    Dehnert, J
    Van Der Aalst, WMP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COOPERATIVE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2004, 13 (03) : 289 - 332
  • [35] Bridging the gap between data acquisition and inference ontologies - towards ontology based link discovery
    Goldstein, ML
    Morris, SA
    Yen, GG
    [J]. SENSORS, AND COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, AND INTELLIGENCE (C3I) TECHNOLOGIES FOR HOMELAND DEFENSE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT II, 2003, 5071 : 116 - 127
  • [36] Bridging the Gap between Operation and Planning Models in WECC
    Kincic, S.
    Davies, D.
    Kosterev, D.
    Zhang, H.
    Thomas, B.
    Vaiman, M.
    Weber, J.
    Ramanathan, R.
    [J]. 2016 IEEE POWER AND ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PESGM), 2016,
  • [37] Bridging the gap between in vitro and in vivo models for neurotoxicology
    Tiffany-Castiglioni, E
    Ehrich, M
    Dees, L
    Costa, LG
    Kodavanti, PRS
    Lasley, SM
    Oortgiesen, M
    Durham, HD
    [J]. TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 51 (02) : 178 - 183
  • [38] Towards Bridging the Gap between Participatory Design and Formal Education
    Goebl, Barbara
    Duvivie, Mirjam
    Jovicic, Suzana
    Kayali, Fares
    [J]. 22ND ANNUAL ACM INTERACTION DESIGN AND CHILDREN CONFERENCE, IDC 2023: Rediscovering Childhood, 2023, : 652 - 656
  • [39] Business process runtime models: towards bridging the gap between design, enactment, and evaluation of business processes
    Goldstein, Anat
    Johanndeiter, Thomas
    Frank, Ulrich
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND E-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2019, 17 (01) : 27 - 64
  • [40] Towards Bridging the Gap between Machine Learning Researchers and Practitioners
    Assem, Haytham
    O'Sullivan, Declan
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART CITY/SOCIALCOM/SUSTAINCOM (SMARTCITY), 2015, : 702 - 708