Decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment and the duty of documentation

被引:27
|
作者
Melltorp, G [1 ]
Nilstun, T [1 ]
机构
[1] LUND UNIV,DEPT MED ETH,S-22362 LUND,SWEDEN
关键词
ethics; documentation; foregoing life-sustaining treatment; intensive care unit; law; medical record;
D O I
10.1007/s001340050206
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To study the current practice of documenting decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU), using the Swedish Medical Records Act as a frame of reference. Setting: The ICU at Malmoe General Hospital, Sweden. Materials. The medical records of the first 600 cases treated in the ICU in 1992. Methods: Analysis of documents and informal observational procedures. Results: Decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment were documented in the medical records of 34 patients, 17 of whom died in the ICU. In many cases, the treatment is specified, but often it is only rather vaguely described. The main reason for foregoing treatment is poor prognosis. There is no indication that the decisions had been discussed with the patients. In 18 of the 34 medical records, there are notes indicating that relatives were informed about the decision. Notes in most of the 34 medical records imply that joint deliberation took place between the anaesthesiologists in the ICU and the other physician(s) responsible for the treatment of the patient. Conclusion. The medical records give a fairly accurate picture of the frequency with which such decisions are made at this particular ICU, although the number might be somewhat underestimated. However, the content of the documentation is rather scanty and does not fully satisfy the requirements of the Swedish Medical Records Act. Further studies are needed to warrant any generalization.
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1019
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] BY NO EXTRAORDINARY MEANS - THE CHOICE TO FOREGO LIFE-SUSTAINING FOOD AND WATER - LYNN,J
    KASTENBAUM, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGING & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1990, 30 (01): : 78 - 79
  • [22] Decisions regarding forgoing life-sustaining treatments
    Van Norman, Gail A.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 30 (02) : 211 - 216
  • [23] AUTONOMY IN ADOLESCENT MEDICINE - A FRAMEWORK FOR DECISIONS ABOUT LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT
    LANTOS, JD
    MILES, SH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 1989, 10 (06) : 460 - 466
  • [24] NANCY B - THE CRIMINAL CODE AND DECISIONS TO FORGO LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT
    FISH, A
    SINGER, PA
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1992, 147 (05) : 637 - 642
  • [25] Making Decisions About Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment in Patients With Dementia
    Arthur R. Derse
    [J]. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 1999, 20 : 55 - 67
  • [26] Life-sustaining treatment decisions in the ICU for patients with ESLD: A prospective investigation
    Hansen, Lissi
    Press, Nancy
    Rosenkranz, Susan J.
    Baggs, Judith Gedney
    Kendall, Judith
    Kerber, Amanda
    Williamson, Angel
    Chesnutt, Mark S.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2012, 35 (05) : 518 - 532
  • [27] Erratum zu: Dokumentation der TherapiebegrenzungErratum to: Documentation of decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapies
    G. Neitzke
    B. Böll
    H. Burchardi
    K. Dannenberg
    G. Duttge
    R. Erchinger
    P. Gretenkort
    C. Hartog
    K. Knochel
    M. Liebig
    A. Michalsen
    G. Michels
    M. Mohr
    F. Nauck
    P. Radke
    F. Salomon
    H. Stopfkuchen
    U. Janssens
    [J]. Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2017, 112 (6) : 530 - 530
  • [28] Factors influencing life-sustaining treatment decisions in a community sample of families
    Karel, MJ
    Gatz, M
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1996, 11 (02) : 226 - 234
  • [29] The Quality of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions: A Pilot Study
    Hickman, Susan E.
    Hammes, Bernard J.
    Torke, Alexia M.
    Sudore, Rebecca L.
    Sachs, Greg A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 20 (02) : 155 - 162
  • [30] Life-sustaining treatment decisions by rehabilitation patients: The uncontested high ground
    Guenther, RT
    Weber, LJ
    [J]. REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 41 (01) : 73 - 86