Genetic parameters and strategies for genetic improvement of stiffness in radiata pine

被引:34
|
作者
Kumar, S.
Dungey, H. S.
Matheson, A. C.
机构
[1] Ensis Genet, Rotorua, New Zealand
[2] Ensis Genet, Kingston, ACT 2604, Australia
关键词
stiffness; sound velocity; wood density; heritability; breeding strategy; genetic correlation; age-age correlation; early selection; Pinus radiata;
D O I
10.1515/sg-2006-0012
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The two main objectives of this study were: (1) to determine how early is it possible to undertake selection to improve the stiffness of corewood; (2) to determine if the selection based on corewood stiffness could also improve outerwood stiffness, and vice versa. Breast-height data from two progeny trials of Pinus radiata D. Don were used. In the first trial (age 30 years), data on Silviscan predicted stiffness (MoE) was obtained for each growth ring on each core sample from 50 open-pollinated families. In the second trial (age 14 years), data on static-bending MoE was obtained using clearwood sticks (300 x 20 x 20 mm) cut from each tree from 18 control-pollinated families. MoE varied from 3.5 GPa in rings 1-5 to about 17 GPa in rings 21-25. Coefficients of variation of corewood and outerwood MoE were about 20-30% and 15-20% respectively. Estimates of narrow-sense heritability for MoE were generally higher (0.50-0.70) in the corewood compared with the outerwood (0.15-0.30). Early selection for MoE could yield substantial gain in corewood MoE but only small gains, if any, in outerwood MoE (especially for rings 21-30). Estimated genetic correlations between density and stiffness appeared moderate in the corewood zone, but high in the outerwood zone. Selection based on density (using 5-mm cores) and acoustic stiffness (using standing tree tools), assessed at age 6-7 years, appeared to be a good option to improve both corewood and outerwood stiffness.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 84
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Breeding Strategies for Genetic Improvement in Buffaloes
    Sethi, Ramesh Kumar
    BUFFALO BULLETIN, 2013, 32 : 219 - 226
  • [32] Comparisons of genetic parameters and clonal value predictions from clonal trials and seedling base population trials of radiata pine
    Baltunis, Brian S.
    Wu, Harry X.
    Dungey, Heidi S.
    Mullin, T. J. 'Tim'
    Brawner, Jeremy T.
    TREE GENETICS & GENOMES, 2009, 5 (01) : 269 - 278
  • [33] Comparisons of genetic parameters and clonal value predictions from clonal trials and seedling base population trials of radiata pine
    Brian S. Baltunis
    Harry X. Wu
    Heidi S. Dungey
    T. J. “Tim” Mullin
    Jeremy T. Brawner
    Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2009, 5 : 269 - 278
  • [34] Simulating deployment of genetic gain in a radiata pine breeding program with genomic selection
    McLean, Duncan
    Apiolaza, Luis
    Paget, Mark
    Klapste, Jaroslav
    TREE GENETICS & GENOMES, 2023, 19 (04)
  • [35] Genetic input selection to a neural classifier for defect classification of radiata pine boards
    Estévez, PA
    Perez, CA
    Goles, E
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2003, 53 (7-8) : 87 - 94
  • [36] Genetic variation in seasonal growth patterns in radiata pine in Galicia (northern Spain)
    Codesido, Veronica
    Fernandez-Lopez, Josefa
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 257 (02) : 518 - 526
  • [37] Simulating deployment of genetic gain in a radiata pine breeding program with genomic selection
    Duncan McLean
    Luis Apiolaza
    Mark Paget
    Jaroslav Klápště
    Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2023, 19
  • [38] Current status and future strategies of in vitro culture techniques for genetic improvement of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek)
    Jaiwal, PK
    Gulati, A
    EUPHYTICA, 1995, 86 (03) : 167 - 181
  • [39] Breeding radiata pine for wood stiffness: Review and analysis
    Jayawickrama, Keith J. S.
    2001, Institute Foresters of Australia (64)
  • [40] Stiffness and checking of Eucalyptus nitens sawn boards: genetic variation and potential for genetic improvement
    David Blackburn
    Matthew Hamilton
    Chris Harwood
    Trevor Innes
    Brad Potts
    Dean Williams
    Tree Genetics & Genomes, 2010, 6 : 757 - 765