SO(2N) and SU(N) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensions

被引:5
|
作者
Bursa, Francis [1 ]
Lau, Richard [2 ]
Teper, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Swansea Univ, Dept Phys, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Oxford, Rudolf Peierls Ctr Theoret Phys, Oxford OX1 3NP, England
来源
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Lattice Gauge Field Theories; 1/N Expansion; STRINGS;
D O I
10.1007/JHEP05(2013)025
中图分类号
O412 [相对论、场论]; O572.2 [粒子物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
We perform an exploratory investigation of how rapidly the physics of SO(2N) gauge theories approaches its N = infinity limit. This question has recently become topical because SO(2N) gauge theories are orbifold equivalent to SIT(N) gauge theories, but do riot have a finite chemical potential sign problem. It is therefore interesting to know how close is the physics of SO(N) to that of SU(3) for the modest values of N where one might be able to perform chemical potential calculations. We consider only the pure gauge theory and, because of the inconvenient location of the lattice strong-to-weak coupling 'bulk' transition in 3+1 dimensions, we largely confine our numerical calculations to 2+1 dimensions in this paper. We provide some analytic estimates of the SO(2N) spectrum in both D = 2 + 1 and D = 3 + 1, and show, numerically, that the D = 2 + 1 SO(6) and SU(4) low-lying spectra do indeed appear to be the same. Our numerical calculations of a number of mass ratios show that the leading O(1/N) correction already dominates for N >= 6, and in some cases down to N = 4, and that, as expected, these ratios become consistent with those of SU(N) as N -> infinity. In particular we see that SO(6) and SU(3) gauge theories are quite similar except for the values of the string tension and coupling, both of which differences can be readily understood.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Thermodynamics of SU(3) gauge theory in 2+1 dimensions
    Bialas, P.
    Daniel, L.
    Morel, A.
    Petersson, B.
    [J]. NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, 2009, 807 (03) : 547 - 565
  • [42] Deconfinement at N >2:: SU(N) Georgi-Glashow model in 2+1 dimensions
    Kogan, II
    Tekin, B
    Kovner, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2001, (05):
  • [43] COMPARING O(N) AND SU(N)XSU(N) SPIN SYSTEMS IN 1+1 DIMENSIONS TO SU(N) GAUGE-THEORIES IN 3+1 DIMENSIONS
    SHIGEMITSU, J
    KOGUT, JB
    SINCLAIR, DK
    [J]. PHYSICS LETTERS B, 1981, 100 (04) : 316 - 320
  • [44] Issues on orientifolds:: on the brane construction of gauge theories with SO(2n) global symmetry
    Hanany, A
    Zaffaroni, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 1999, (07):
  • [45] Closed flux tubes in higher representations and their string description in D=2+1 SU(N) gauge theories
    Andreas Athenodorou
    Michael Teper
    [J]. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2013
  • [46] On the large N limit of SU(N) lattice gauge theories in five dimensions
    Irges, Nikos
    Koutsoumbas, George
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2012, (08):
  • [47] Closed flux tubes in D=2+1 SU(N) gauge theories: dynamics and effective string description
    Athenodorou, Andreas
    Teper, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2016, (10):
  • [48] On the large N limit of SU(N) lattice gauge theories in five dimensions
    Nikos Irges
    George Koutsoumbas
    [J]. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2012
  • [49] Closed flux tubes in higher representations and their string description in D=2+1 SU(N) gauge theories
    Athenodorou, Andreas
    Teper, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS, 2013, (06):
  • [50] An improved RNS-to-binary converter for 7-modulus set {2n–5–1, 2n–3–1, 2n–2+1, 2n–1–1, 2n–1+1, 2n, 2n+1} for n even
    M V N Madhavi Latha
    Rashmi Ramesh Rachh
    P V Ananda Mohan
    [J]. Sādhanā, 2020, 45