Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair

被引:123
|
作者
Bernhard, VM
Mitchell, RS
Matsumura, JS
Brewster, DC
Decker, M
Lamparello, P
Raithel, D
Collin, J
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[6] NYU, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[7] Klinikum Sud Nurnberg, Nurnberg, Germany
[8] John Radcliffe Hosp, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[9] Guidant Corp, Indianapolis, IN 46244 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mva.2002.123758
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to present the experience with aneurysm rupture after deployment of Guidant/EVT (Guidant) endografts and review previously reported cases with other devices. Methods: Records from Guidant/EVT clinical trials and postmarket approval databases from February 1993 to August 2000 were analyzed to identify patients with rupture and to extract pertinent data. Previously reported cases were obtained with a Medline search. Results: Seven ruptures were found with Guidant/EVT devices. Five of these occurred among the 686 patients in US Food and Drug Administration protocols (group I) who were followed for a mean of 41.8 +/- 21.9 months and limited to the subgroup of 93 first generation tube endografts. Two ruptures occurred in group II (3260 patients after market approval with limited follow-up), specifically in the subgroup of 166 patients who underwent treatment with second generation tube grafts. No ruptures were found in patients with bifurcation or unilateral iliac implants followed for a mean of 37.5 months. All ruptures were caused by distal aortic type I endoleaks on the basis of attachment system fractures (first generation devices only), aortic neck dilatations, persistent primary endoleaks, migration, overlooked imaging abnormalities, refused reintervention, and poor patient selection. The mortality rate was 57% (4/7) overall and was 50% for surgical repair (3/6). A literature search identified 40 additional ruptures related to other devices, for a total of 47. All 44 that were documented with adequate data were caused by endoleaks (26 type I, 2 type II, II type III, and 5 source not reported). Other contributing factors were graft module separation and graft wall deterioration. The overall mortality rate for the combined series was 50%, with an operative mortality rate of 41%. Conclusion: Postendograft AAA rupture is infrequent, although the true incidence rate is unclear because of inadequate follow-up of individual device designs. Tube endografts should be limited to the rare patient with ideal anatomy, no other alternatives, and at high risk for standard open repair. Prevention of aneurysm rupture requires long-term surveillance with attention to subtle imaging abnormalities and the establishment of reliable follow-up protocols for specific devices. The outcome of postendograft aneurysm rupture is similar to that of rupture without prior endograft therapy.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1155 / 1162
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The natural history of type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Boniakowski, Anna E.
    De Martino, Randall R.
    Coleman, Dawn M.
    Eliason, Jonathan L.
    Goodney, Phillip P.
    Rectenwald, John E.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 64 (06) : 1645 - 1651
  • [32] Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in COVID 19 Pandemic
    Lubna Alrowaili
    Alvaro Balcazar
    Owayed Al Shammeri
    Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Journal, 2022, 4 (2) : 94 - 98
  • [33] Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: Endovascular repair is feasible in 40% of patients
    Reichart, M
    Geelkerken, RH
    Huisman, AB
    van Det, RJ
    de Smit, P
    Volker, EP
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 26 (05) : 479 - 486
  • [34] Endovascular aneurysm repair as a mean of treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Manish Mehta
    John Byrne
    John Taggert
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2013, 126 (03) : 558 - 564
  • [35] Endovascular Repair of a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in a Patient With Unfavorable Anatomy
    Bellosta, Raffaello
    Luzzani, Luca
    Carugati, Claudio
    Cossu, Luisa
    Sarcina, Antonio
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 44 (01) : 48 - 49
  • [36] Endovascular ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVRAR): A systematic review
    Harkin, D. W.
    Dillon, M.
    Blair, P. H.
    Ellis, P. K.
    Kee, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 34 (06) : 673 - 681
  • [37] Mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm with selective use of endovascular repair
    Verhoeven, E. L. G.
    Kapma, M. R.
    Bos, W. T. G. J.
    Vourliotakis, G.
    Bracale, U. M.
    Bekkema, F.
    Vahl, A. C.
    Van den Dungen, J. J. A. M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (05): : 587 - 593
  • [38] Endovascular aneurysm repair as a mean of treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Mehta, Manish
    Byrne, John
    Taggert, John
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (03) : 558 - 564
  • [39] Endovascular repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm under local anaesthesia
    Morales, JP
    Irani, FG
    Jones, KG
    Taylor, PR
    Dourado, R
    Sabharwal, T
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 (925): : 62 - 64
  • [40] Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome after Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Gidlund, K. Djavani
    Wanhainen, A.
    Bjorck, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 41 (06) : 742 - 747