Thermally activated laterite soil as an adsorbent for phosphate and fluoride removal from contaminated water

被引:1
|
作者
Dissanayake, N. U. S. [1 ]
Pupulewatte, P. G. H. [1 ]
Jayawardana, D. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sri Jayewardenepura, Dept Forestry & Environm Sci, Fac Sci Appl, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
关键词
Adsorption; Thermal activation; Laterite; Phosphate; Fluoride; Optimum condition; AQUEOUS-SOLUTION; FRESH-WATER; ADSORPTION; EUTROPHICATION; GROUNDWATER; DRINKING; ALUMINUM; ION;
D O I
10.5004/dwt.2022.28798
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The present study examines the efficiency of thermal-activated laterite soil in different grain sizes as an adsorbent for removing phosphate and fluoride ions from contaminated water under laboratory conditions. The fresh laterite was collected from the inner layers of the weathering profile by auger drilling method. Collected soil samples were air-dried to remove the excess moisture content. Air-dried soil was crushed to prepare powdered material (2 and 0.5 mm). Thermally activated soil samples were prepared by heating the laterite at 100 degrees C, 200 degrees C, 300 degrees C, and 400 degrees C for 3 h in a muffle furnace. Adsorption conditions of phosphate and fluoride ions for the soil samples were determined by batch experiments conducted at room temperature and natural pH. Based on the results of studies, 300 degrees C and 400 degrees C (2 and 0.5 mm gran sizes) thermal-activated laterite soil proved to be an effective adsorbent and had higher removal capacities. The phosphate and fluoride removal efficiencies of 300 degrees C activated 0.5 mm laterite soil were 96.46% +/- 0.63% and 99.33% +/- 0.40%, respectively. Phosphate and fluoride removal efficiencies from 300 degrees C activated 2 mm laterite soil were 92.72% +/- 0.60% and 96.80% +/- 0.60%, respectively. In contrast, 20 min for 2 mm grain size and 10 min for 0.5 mm were the optimal contact times for maximum phosphate and fluoride ion removal. Phosphate removal efficiency was 91.93% +/- 0.24% and fluoride removal efficiency was 92.67% +/- 0.24% after 10 min at 300 degrees C, 0.5 mm laterite soil. At 20 min, the phosphate removal efficiency in 2 mm of 300 degrees C soil was 77.88% +/- 1.30%, and the fluoride removal efficiency was 81.60% +/- 0.31%. 0.75 g of laterite soil was identified as the optimum soil dosage for both grain sizes of phosphate and fluoride removal. The removal efficiency of phosphate and fluoride from 0.75 g, 300 degrees C 0.5 mm laterite soil were 90.08% +/- 0.30% and 93.53% +/- 0.30%, respectively. Phosphate and fluoride removal efficiency from 0.75 g, 300 degrees C 2 mm laterite soil were 84.88% +/- 0.10% and 79.33% +/- 0.10%, respectively. The results concluded that the percentage of removal rises with the increase in temperature. In contrast, results revealed that thermal-activated laterite soil has a strong ability to remove phosphate and fluoride from water.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 235
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative evaluation of phosphate abatement using laterite soil and activated carbon
    Sreekumar, U.
    Thalla, A. K.
    Nair, V. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 16 (08) : 4493 - 4502
  • [33] Arsenic removal from contaminated soil using phosphoric acid and phosphate
    Zeng Min
    Liao Bohan
    Lei Ming
    Zhang Yong
    Zeng Qingru
    Ouyang Bin
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2008, 20 (01) : 75 - 79
  • [34] Comparative evaluation of phosphate abatement using laterite soil and activated carbon
    U. Sreekumar
    A. K. Thalla
    V. V. Nair
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 16 : 4493 - 4502
  • [35] Activated carbon from sawdust for naphthalene removal from contaminated water
    Kumar, Amit
    Gupta, Himanshu
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2020, 20
  • [36] Fluoride removal studies from contaminated ground water by using bauxite
    Sujana, M. G.
    Anand, S.
    DESALINATION, 2011, 267 (2-3) : 222 - 227
  • [37] Phosphate modified magnetite@ferrihydrite as an magnetic adsorbent for Cd(II) removal from water, soil, and sediment
    Fu, Haoyang
    He, Hongfei
    Zhu, Runliang
    Ling, Lan
    Zhang, Weixian
    Chen, Qingze
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 764
  • [38] Commercial synthetic hydrotalcite as an adsorbent nanomaterial for removal of bacteria from contaminated water
    Sidarenka, Anastasiya, V
    Leanovich, Sviatlana, I
    Kalamiyets, Emiliya, I
    Vieira, Daniel E. L.
    Cardoso, Joao P., V
    Tedim, Joao
    Salak, Andrei N.
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2023, 28 (03)
  • [39] Mesoporous Iron Adsorbent: A Novel Technique for Arsenic Removal from Contaminated Water
    Majumder, Chanchal
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATERIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (ICMAEE 2014), 2014, 57 : 80 - 83
  • [40] Removal of lead from contaminated water bodies using sea nodule as an adsorbent
    Bhattacharjee, S
    Chakrabarty, S
    Maity, S
    Kar, S
    Thakur, P
    Bhattacharyya, G
    WATER RESEARCH, 2003, 37 (16) : 3954 - 3966