Hartmann's Procedure or Primary Anastomosis?

被引:17
|
作者
Kreis, Martin E. [1 ]
Mueller, Mario H. [1 ]
Thasler, Wolfgang H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, DE-81377 Munich, Germany
关键词
Diverticulitis; Emergency surgery; Perforation; Sigmoid colectomy; PERFORATED SIGMOID DIVERTICULITIS;
D O I
10.1159/000335726
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Perforation following acute diverticulitis is a typical scenario during the first attack. Different classification systems exist to classify acute perforated diverticulitis. While the Hinchey classification, which is based on intraoperative findings, is internationally best known, the German Hansen-Stock classification which is based on CT scan is widely accepted within Germany. When surgery is necessary, sigmoid colectomy is the standard of care. An important question is whether patients should receive primary anastomosis or a Hartmann procedure subsequently. A priori there are several arguments for both procedures. Hartmann's operation is extremely safe and, therefore, represents the best option in severely ill patients and/or extensive peritonitis. However, this operation carries a high risk of stoma nonreversal, or, when reversal is attempted, a high risk in terms of morbidity and mortality. In contrast, primary anastomosis with or without loop ileostoma is a slightly more lengthy procedure as normally the splenic flexure needs to be mobilized and construction of the anastomosis may consume more time than the Hartmann operation. The big advantage of primary anastomosis, however, is that there is no need for the potentially risky stoma reversal operation. The most interesting question is when to do the Hartmann operation or primary anastomosis. Several comparative case series were published showing that primary anastomosis is feasible in many patients. However, no randomized trial is available to date. It is of note, that all non-randomized case series are biased, i.e. that patients in better condition received anastomosis and those with severe peritonitis underwent Hartmann's operation. This bias is undoubtedly likely to be present, even if not obvious, in the published papers! Our own data suggest that this decision should not be based on the extent of peritonitis but rather on patient condition and comorbidity. In conclusion, sigmoid colectomy and primary anastomosis is feasible and safe in many patients who need surgery for perforated diverticulitis, particularly when combined with loop ileostomy. Based on our own published analysis, however, we recommend performing Hartmann's operation in severely ill patients who carry substantial comorbidity, while the extent of peritonitis appears not to be of predominant importance. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 85
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic lavage vs. Hartmann's procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon
    N. Regenet
    P. Pessaux
    S. Hennekinne
    E. Lermite
    J. J. Tuech
    O. Brehant
    J. P. Arnaud
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2003, 18 : 503 - 507
  • [42] Emergency Left Colon Resection for Acute Perforation. Primary Anastomosis or Hartmann’s Procedure? A Case-matched Control Study
    Stefan Breitenstein
    Armin Kraus
    Dieter Hahnloser
    Marco Decurtins
    Pierre-Alain Clavien
    Nicolas Demartines
    World Journal of Surgery, 2007, 31 : 2117 - 2124
  • [43] Mortality and Morbidity After Hartmann’s Procedure Versus Primary Anastomosis Without a Diverting Stoma for Colorectal Perforation: A Nationwide Observational Study
    Asuka Tsuchiya
    Hideo Yasunaga
    Yusuke Tsutsumi
    Hiroki Matsui
    Kiyohide Fushimi
    World Journal of Surgery, 2018, 42 : 866 - 875
  • [44] Perforated sigmoid diverticulitis: Hartmann’s procedure or resection with primary anastomosis—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials
    Roberto Cirocchi
    Sorena Afshar
    Fadlo Shaban
    Riccardo Nascimbeni
    Nereo Vettoretto
    Salomone Di Saverio
    Justus Randolph
    Mauro Zago
    Massimo Chiarugi
    Gian Andrea Binda
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2018, 22 : 743 - 753
  • [45] Mortality and Morbidity After Hartmann's Procedure Versus Primary Anastomosis Without a Diverting Stoma for Colorectal Perforation: A Nationwide Observational Study
    Tsuchiya, Asuka
    Yasunaga, Hideo
    Tsutsumi, Yusuke
    Matsui, Hiroki
    Fushimi, Kiyohide
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 42 (03) : 866 - 875
  • [46] Emergency left colon resection for acute perforation. Primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure? A case-matched control study
    Breitenstein, Stefan
    Kraus, Armin
    Hahnloser, Dieter
    Decurtins, Marco
    Clavien, Pierre-Alain
    Demartines, Nicolas
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 31 (11) : 2117 - 2124
  • [47] Comparison of Hartmann's procedure vs. resection with primary anastomosis in perforated sigmoid diverticulitis: a retrospective single-center study
    Pizza, Francesco
    D'Antonio, Dario
    Arcopinto, Michele
    Dell'Isola, Chiara
    Marvaso, Alberto
    EUROPEAN SURGERY-ACTA CHIRURGICA AUSTRIACA, 2020, 52 (04): : 179 - 186
  • [48] Perforated left colonic diverticulitis with purulent or faecal peritonitis: Primary Anastomosis or Hartmann's Procedure? A Prospective Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial
    Oberkofler, C. E.
    Rickenbacher, A.
    Raptis, D. A.
    Lehmann, K.
    Villiger, P.
    Buchli, C.
    Grieder, F.
    Decurtins, M.
    Tempia, A.
    Demartines, N.
    Hahnloser, D.
    Clavien, P. A.
    Breitenstein, S.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2011, 141 : 7S - 7S
  • [49] Primary anastomosis after intraoperative colonic lavage vs. Hartmann's procedure in generalized peritonitis complicating diverticular disease of the colon
    Regenet, N
    Pessaux, P
    Hennekinne, S
    Lermite, E
    Tuech, JJ
    Brehant, O
    Arnaud, JP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2003, 18 (06) : 503 - 507
  • [50] Comparison of Hartmann’s procedure vs. resection with primary anastomosis in perforated sigmoid diverticulitis: a retrospective single-center study
    Francesco Pizza
    Dario D’Antonio
    Michele Arcopinto
    Chiara Dell’Isola
    Alberto Marvaso
    European Surgery, 2020, 52 : 179 - 186